Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Charleroi · Belgium

DNAVision (Belgium)

Research works
6
▲ 2200% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.2k
346.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
19.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
69%
world 40%
International
50%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: DNAVision (Belgium) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does DNAVision (Belgium) work in?

In all years, 48% of research at DNAVision (Belgium) is in Health Sciences, 45% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (44%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (27%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (12%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Health Sciences: 3 fractional works · 47.7% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 43.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 11.4% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 7.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 6.7% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 3.3% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 45.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 26.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 17.6% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 11.6% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 9.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHorticulture: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiological Psychiatry: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 7.0% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 7.0% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKDNAVision(Belgium)6fractional works, all years
Life Sciences45%Physical Sciences7%Health Sciences48%Social Sciences0%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine343.7%
    2. Health Professions02.2%
    3. Veterinary01.7%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology226.6%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences111.6%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology04.0%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics02.1%
    5. Neuroscience00.8%
    1. Environmental Science07.0%
    1. Arts and Humanities00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 11.38× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5.07× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Environmental Science: 1.95× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.50× its world share, 0 worksArts and Humanities1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 11.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.38×1 works
  2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology5.07×0 works
  3. Environmental Science1.95×0 works
  4. Health Professions1.10×0 works
  5. Arts and Humanities0.50×0 works
  6. Medicine0.25×0 works

What are the most cited papers from DNAVision (Belgium)?

The most cited paper from DNAVision (Belgium) is "Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa" (Carlotta De Filippo, Duccio Cavalieri, Monica Di Paola et al., 2010), with 5,726 citations. Next come "The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models" (922) and "High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals alterations of intestinal microbiota in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients" (224).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa Carlotta De Filippo, Duccio Cavalieri, Monica Di Paola et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access 2 Aug 2010 5,726
2 The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models Leming M. Shi et al. · Nature Biotechnology Open access201 authors 30 Jul 2010 922
3 High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals alterations of intestinal microbiota in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients Marc Frémont, Danny H. Coomans, Sébastien Massart et al. · Anaerobe Open access 19 Jun 2013 224
4 Ecotoxicology inside the gut: impact of heavy metals on the mouse microbiome Jérôme Breton, Sébastien Massart, Peter A. R. Vandamme et al. · BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology Open access Dec 2013 221
5 16S rRNA Gene Pyrosequencing Reveals Shift in Patient Faecal Microbiota During High-Dose Chemotherapy as Conditioning Regimen for Bone Marrow Transplantation Emmanuel Montassier, Éric Batard, Sébastien Massart et al. · Microbial Ecology 8 Jan 2014 158
All 27 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does DNAVision (Belgium) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Plant Virus Research Studies, Plant and Fungal Interactions Research, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions.

  1. 1 Plant Virus Research Studies Plant Science 0 works
  2. 2 Plant and Fungal Interactions Research Endocrinology 0 works
  3. 3 CRISPR and Genetic Engineering Molecular Biology 0 works
  4. 4 Bacteriophages and microbial interactions Ecology 0 works
  5. 5 Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies Plant Science 0 works
  6. 6 Mosquito-borne diseases and control Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  7. 7 Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy Horticulture 0 works
  8. 8 Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity Plant Science 0 works
  9. 9 Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases Cell Biology 0 works
  10. 10 Plant Pathogens and Resistance Plant Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available68.7%not open31.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors50.5%domestic only49.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has DNAVision (Belgium)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 2200% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is DNAVision (Belgium) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000014% in 2023.

still counting0.000020%0.000040%0.000060%DNAVision (Belgium)0.0000012% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of DNAVision (Belgium) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Charleroi

All research institutions in Charleroi

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about DNAVision (Belgium). Posts are plain text and can be reported.