Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies is a research topic within Plant Science. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1950. 30.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the genomics, pathogenicity, and host interactions of plant pathogenic bacteria, particularly in the context of bacterial blight in rice and other crops. It covers topics such as type III secretion systems, effector proteins, resistance genes, and the molecular mechanisms underlying host specificity. The research also delves into the genomics and evolution of specific bacterial pathogens such as Pseudomonas syringae and Ralstonia solanacearum.
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria
- Genomics
- Type III Secretion System
- Bacterial Blight
- Host Specificity
- Effector Proteins
- Rice Resistance Genes
- Phyllosphere Pathogens
- Pseudomonas syringae
- Ralstonia solanacearum
- Research works
- 25k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 7.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 30.7% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +26% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research?
By volume, China and India publish the most (1k and 549 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 1k works
- 2 India 549 works
- 3 United States 492 works
- 4 Brazil 171 works
- 5 South Korea 132 works
- 6 France 125 works
- 7 Japan 112 works
- 8 Italy 88 works
- 9 Spain 86 works
- 10 Türkiye 84 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Guizhou University publishes the most Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research, followed by South China Agricultural University and Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Guizhou UniversityChina 39 works
- 2 South China Agricultural UniversityChina 32 works
- 3 Indian Agricultural Research InstituteIndia 30 works
- 4 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural AffairsChina 28 works
- 5 University of FloridaUnited States 27 works
- 6 Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesChina 26 works
- 7 Institute of Plant ProtectionChina 25 works
- 8 Nanjing Agricultural UniversityChina 24 works
- 9 China Agricultural UniversityChina 21 works
- 10 Huazhong Agricultural UniversityChina 21 works
Who are the leading researchers in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies include David L. Davies, Erko Stackebrandt and Didier Raoult.
- 1 David L. Davies United Kingdom 2.8k citations
- 2 Erko Stackebrandt Germany 2.5k citations
- 3 Didier Raoult France 2k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research done?
The largest centres of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), New Delhi (India), Guangzhou (China) and Guiyang (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Jeonju.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- JeonjuKR · 25.5 works16×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies?
Among universities, judged by research, Guizhou University, Huazhong Agricultural University and Northwest A&F University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guizhou UniversityChina | 83.3 | 56.8% | 17.9× | 39 | +75.1% |
| 2 | Huazhong Agricultural UniversityChina | 71.0 | 55.0% | 14.8× | 21 | +0.1% |
| 3 | Northwest A&F UniversityChina | 69.5 | 52.9% | 11.1× | 18 | +29.2% |
| 4 | Fujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityChina | 69.3 | 41.4% | 20.7× | 20 | +120.3% |
| 5 | South China Agricultural UniversityChina | 66.7 | 34.2% | 22.3× | 32 | +57.6% |
| 6 | Nanjing Agricultural UniversityChina | 65.5 | 43.3% | 14.7× | 24 | +2.9% |
| 7 | China Agricultural UniversityChina | 64.7 | 49.3% | 9.0× | 21 | +1.6% |
| 8 | Southwest UniversityChina | 64.7 | 50.6% | 6.8× | 15 | +159.6% |
| 9 | Sichuan Agricultural UniversityChina | 57.0 | 44.0% | 7.5× | 9 | +300.0% |
| 10 | Tamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityIndia | 52.3 | 17.4% | 21.2× | 20 | +108.6% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 26% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.