Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · San Mateo · United States

Doximity (United States)

Research works
16
▲ 143% vs 2018-21
Citations
219
13.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
82%
world 40%
International
5%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Doximity (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Doximity (United States) work in?

In all years, 45% of research at Doximity (United States) is in Social Sciences, 38% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (31%), Social Sciences (22%), Business, Management and Accounting (12%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 7 fractional works · 44.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 21.8% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 11.6% of its workManagement Information Systems: 2 fractional works · 11.6% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.3% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.3% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 37.5% of its workComputer Science: 5 fractional works · 30.6% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 11.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 5.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 6.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 16.5% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 9.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 6.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKDoximity (UnitedStates)16fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences38%Health Sciences16%Social Sciences45%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 11 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences321.8%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting211.6%
    3. Psychology16.0%
    4. Decision Sciences14.3%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.2%
    1. Computer Science530.6%
    2. Engineering16.9%
    1. Medicine29.7%
    2. Health Professions16.8%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 4.04× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.60× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 2.48× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 5.11× its world share, 2 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 6.20× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.78× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences6.20×1 works
  2. Business, Management and Accounting5.11×2 works
  3. Computer Science4.04×4 works
  4. Health Professions2.48×1 works
  5. Social Sciences1.78×2 works
  6. Engineering0.60×1 works
  7. Medicine0.32×1 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.21×0 works
  9. Psychology0.14×0 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Doximity (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Nate Gross and Bushra Anjum lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Doximity (United States).

  1. 1 Nate Gross United States · #1,903,637 worldwide 408 citations · 21 works
  2. 2 Bushra Anjum United States · #6,322,889 worldwide 194 citations · 62 works
All ranked researchers at Doximity (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Doximity (United States)?

The most cited paper from Doximity (United States) is "Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1" (Marcio G. von Muhlen, Lucila Ohno‐Machado, 2012), with 323 citations. Next come "Female Physicians Earn An Estimated $2 Million Less Than Male Physicians Over A Simulated 40-Year Career" (113) and "Gender Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Emergency Physicians in the United States" (69).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1 Marcio G. von Muhlen, Lucila Ohno‐Machado · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Open access 4 Jul 2012 323
2 Female Physicians Earn An Estimated $2 Million Less Than Male Physicians Over A Simulated 40-Year Career Christopher Whaley, Tina Koo, Vineet M. Arora et al. · Health Affairs Open access Dec 2021 113
3 Gender Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Emergency Physicians in the United States Christopher Bennett, Ali S. Raja, Neena Kapoor et al. · Academic Emergency Medicine 13 Jan 2019 69
4 Practice composition and sex differences in physician income: observational study Christopher Whaley, Daniel R. Arnold, Nate Gross et al. · BMJ Open access 30 Jul 2020 44
5 The Association Between Physician Gender and Career Advancement Among Academic Rheumatologists in the United States April M Jorge, Marcy B. Bolster, Xiaoqing Fu et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatology Open access 16 Aug 2020 29
All 31 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Doximity (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: ICT in Developing Communities, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance and Information Systems Theories and Implementation.

  1. 1 ICT in Developing Communities Information Systems 2 works
  2. 2 Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Safety Research 1 works
  3. 3 FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance Management Information Systems 1 works
  4. 4 Information Systems Theories and Implementation Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Green IT and Sustainability Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1 works
  6. 6 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
  7. 7 Teaching and Learning Programming Computer Science Applications 0 works
  8. 8 Persona Design and Applications Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
  9. 9 IoT and Edge/Fog Computing Computer Networks and Communications 0 works
  10. 10 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available82.4%not open17.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors4.8%domestic only95.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Doximity (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 143% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in San Mateo

All research institutions in San Mateo

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Doximity (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.