Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca
In research, Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,989 of 10,521 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#7,981 of 12,888 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,300 of 6,365 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Information Systems and Management, Urban Studies and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — Information Systems and Management is 16.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #13,685 of 28,054 · #16,804 all time
- Rank in Brazil
- #225 of 714
- Research works
- 3.1k ▲ 110% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 16k 5.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 67% world 28%
What is Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,989 of 10,521 | 7.9% | 410 | #8127 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #7,981 of 12,888 | 7.2% | 378 | #9543 | |
| Social SciencesField | #4,300 of 6,365 | 7.4% | 245 | #5618 | |
| EngineeringField | #5,116 of 6,636 | 8.0% | 138 | #6513 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,607 of 1,892 | 7.8% | 90 | #1848 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #4,095 of 4,667 | 6.5% | 117 | #5222 | |
| Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield | #2,433 of 2,578 | 5.0% | 63 | #3454 | |
| Environmental ScienceField | #3,489 of 3,551 | 2.9% | 62 | #5686 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#8,127 #5,989
- Physical Sciences#9,543 #7,981
- Social Sciences#5,618 #4,300
- Engineering#6,513 #5,116
- Education#1,848 #1,607
- Computer Science#5,222 #4,095
- Sociology and Political Science#3,454 #2,433
- Environmental Science#5,686 #3,489
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Information Systems and Management takes 16.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Information Systems and ManagementSubfield · 39.8 works16×
- Urban StudiesSubfield · 21.5 works9.0×
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawSubfield · 34.5 works6.8×
- Decision SciencesField · 46.8 works5.6×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 5.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 5.6×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Arts and Humanities 1.9×
- Computer Science 1.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.4×
- Environmental Science 1.4×
- Engineering 1.1×
- Energy 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.8×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.8×
- Materials Science 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.7×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Chemical Engineering 0.5×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca?
Ranked on the composite score, Eduardo Ogasawara, Sílvio de Barros and Álvaro Chrispino lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca.
- 1 Eduardo Ogasawara Brazil · #185,995 worldwide 125 citations · 44 works
- 2 Sílvio de Barros Brazil · #283,748 worldwide 170 citations · 16 works
- 3 Álvaro Chrispino Brazil · #334,038 worldwide 11 citations · 24 works
- 4 Pedro Senna Brazil · #468,598 worldwide 41 citations · 18 works
- 5 Fernando Pessoa Brazil · #520,487 worldwide 5 citations · 41 works
- 6 Pedro Manuel Calas Lopes Pacheco Brazil · #523,047 worldwide 71 citations · 27 works
- 7 Marco Braga Brazil · #586,406 worldwide 21 citations · 25 works
- 8 Marcelo Borges Rocha Brazil · #685,384 worldwide 12 citations · 44 works
- 9 Joel dos Santos Brazil · #775,803 worldwide 10 citations · 18 works
- 10 Andréia Guerra Brazil · #812,769 worldwide 12 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Qualitative Research, Teacher Training, Public Policy, Sustainability, Social Inequality, Innovation Management, Marketing Strategies and Data Analysis.
- Agroecology
- Legislation
- Training
- Eco-friendly Practices
- Critical Pedagogy
- Educational Reform
- Inclusive Education
- Environmental Education
- Identity
- Science Education
- Cultural Identity
- Healthcare
- Sustainable Development
- Organizational Management
- Data Analysis
- Social Inequality
- Online Learning
- Education
- Public Policy
- Qualitative Research
- Sustainability
- Teacher Training
- Globalization
- Educational Technology
- Curriculum Development
- Innovation Management
- Marketing Strategies
- Research Methods
- Renewable Energy
- Innovation
- Waste Management
- Social Impact
- Social Movements
- Distance Learning
- Pedagogical Practices
- Water Resources
- Educational Policies
- Social Participation
- Educational Games
- Active Learning
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability78▲ 3.7×39 topics
- Qualitative Research66▲ 8.8×11 topics
- Teacher Training64▲ 12×10 topics
- Public Policy56▲ 13×10 topics
- Globalization48▲ 2.8×40 topics
- Education45▲ 3.0×39 topics
- Educational Technology43▲ 4.2×18 topics
- Online Learning41▲ 5.7×9 topics
- Curriculum Development40▲ 6.6×5 topics
- Social Inequality38▲ 16×4 topics
- Innovation Management37▲ 26×3 topics
- Data Analysis37▲ 16×4 topics
- Marketing Strategies37▲ 43×2 topics
- Organizational Management37▲ 65×1 topic
- Research Methods37▲ 26×1 topic
- Sustainable Development33▲ 2.4×25 topics
- Renewable Energy33▲ 2.6×26 topics
- Healthcare33▲ 3.3×16 topics
- Innovation30▲ 3.3×27 topics
- Cultural Identity29▲ 6.4×10 topics
- Waste Management27▲ 7.5×8 topics
- Science Education27▲ 49×3 topics
- Social Impact26▲ 7.6×7 topics
- Identity25▲ 4.0×25 topics
- Social Movements24▲ 9.1×10 topics
- Environmental Education23▲ 17×6 topics
- Distance Learning22▲ 7.7×5 topics
- Inclusive Education21▲ 7.0×3 topics
- Pedagogical Practices21▲ 27×2 topics
- Educational Reform21▲ 19×4 topics
- Water Resources21▲ 9.9×3 topics
- Critical Pedagogy21▲ 28×2 topics
- Educational Policies21▲ 21×2 topics
- Eco-friendly Practices20▲ 39×1 topic
- Social Participation20▲ 37×1 topic
- Training19▲ 10×4 topics
- Educational Games19▲ 22×2 topics
- Legislation19▲ 13×3 topics
- Active Learning18▲ 12×2 topics
- Agroecology18▲ 14×3 topics
Which research topics does Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Business and Management Studies, Education Pedagogy and Practices, Environmental Sustainability and Education and Education and Digital Technologies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Business and Management Studies Information Systems and Management 37 works
- 2 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 20 works
- 3 Environmental Sustainability and Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 20 works
- 4 Education and Digital Technologies Sociology and Political Science 18 works
- 5 Science and Education Research Education 18 works
- 6 Academic Research in Diverse Fields Education 16 works
- 7 Urban Development and Societal Issues Urban Studies 11 works
- 8 Science and Science Education Political Science and International Relations 11 works
- 9 Education and Public Policy Political Science and International Relations 11 works
- 10 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 11 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 110% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Rio de Janeiro
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
- Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
- Fundação Getulio Vargas
- Petrobras (Brazil)
- State University of Norte Fluminense
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.