- Research works
- 85 ▼ 7% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 384 4.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 62% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, 8.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 8.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7.1×
- Health Professions 4.0×
- Nursing 3.0×
- Social Sciences 2.1×
- Arts and Humanities 1.9×
- Environmental Science 1.1×
- Chemistry 0.9×
- Neuroscience 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
Which keywords describe research at Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainable Development, Social Justice, Public Policy, Community Engagement, Local Development, Territorial Governance, Citizen Participation and Environmental Participation.
- Soil Fertility
- Hydrographic Basins
- Environmental Education
- Chronic Diseases
- Digital Communication
- Didactic Models
- Science Education
- Healthcare Access
- Social Discourse
- Educational Policies
- Biodiversity
- Genetic Diversity
- Human Rights
- Curriculum Development
- Quality of Life
- Sustainability
- Environmental Participation
- Territorial Governance
- Community Engagement
- Social Justice
- Sustainable Development
- Public Policy
- Local Development
- Citizen Participation
- Globalization
- Teacher Training
- Constitutional Law
- Discourse Analysis
- Social Media
- Rhetoric
- Educational Practices
- Cultural Heritage
- Colonialism
- Literacy
- Textual Production
- Teaching Methodologies
- Information Studies
- Environmental Conservation
- Health Policy
- Risk Perception
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Sustainable Development10▲ 10×6 topics
- Social Justice9▲ 21×3 topics
- Public Policy8▲ 23×7 topics
- Community Engagement7▲ 28×4 topics
- Local Development6▲ 54×2 topics
- Territorial Governance6▲ 50×2 topics
- Citizen Participation6▲ 59×1 topic
- Environmental Participation6▲ 74×1 topic
- Globalization5▲ 3.0×13 topics
- Sustainability4▲ 2.6×9 topics
- Teacher Training4▲ 11×4 topics
- Quality of Life3▲ 2.9×6 topics
- Constitutional Law3▲ 27×1 topic
- Curriculum Development3▲ 10×2 topics
- Discourse Analysis3▲ 16×3 topics
- Human Rights3▲ 4.2×1 topic
- Social Media3▲ 4.5×4 topics
- Genetic Diversity3▲ 6.8×7 topics
- Rhetoric3▲ 25×2 topics
- Biodiversity3▲ 4.1×6 topics
- Educational Practices3▲ 43×2 topics
- Educational Policies2▲ 31×3 topics
- Cultural Heritage2▲ 6.4×3 topics
- Social Discourse2▲ 63×2 topics
- Colonialism2▲ 5.1×4 topics
- Healthcare Access2▲ 13×4 topics
- Literacy2▲ 46×1 topic
- Science Education2▲ 53×2 topics
- Textual Production2▲ 72×1 topic
- Didactic Models2▲ 82×1 topic
- Teaching Methodologies2▲ 34×1 topic
- Digital Communication2▲ 32×1 topic
- Information Studies2▲ 101×1 topic
- Chronic Diseases2▲ 7.4×3 topics
- Environmental Conservation2▲ 32×1 topic
- Environmental Education2▲ 21×2 topics
- Health Policy2▲ 14×3 topics
- Hydrographic Basins2▲ 96×1 topic
- Risk Perception2▲ 11×4 topics
- Soil Fertility2▲ 12×3 topics
Which research topics does Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Science and Education Research, Occupational Health and Burnout, Education Pedagogy and Practices and Agricultural and Food Sciences.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Science and Education Research Education 1 works
- 2 Occupational Health and Burnout Occupational Therapy 1 works
- 3 Education Pedagogy and Practices Education 1 works
- 4 Agricultural and Food Sciences Forestry 1 works
- 5 Brazilian Legal Issues Law 1 works
- 6 Growth and nutrition in plants Plant Science 1 works
- 7 Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems Forestry 0 works
- 8 Health, Nursing, Elderly Care General Health Professions 0 works
- 9 Brazilian cultural history and politics Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 10 Hibiscus Plant Research Studies Pharmacology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 7% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Recife
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
- Universidade de Pernambuco
- Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
- Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau
- Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco
- Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.