Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Hospital / health system · Innsbruck · Austria

Gelenkpunkt

Research works
65
▲ 15% vs 2018-21
Citations
845
13.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
25.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
59%
world 40%
International
64%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Gelenkpunkt is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Gelenkpunkt work in?

In 2022-now, 77% of research at Gelenkpunkt is in Health Sciences, 15% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (72%), Engineering (7%), Arts and Humanities (5%). It does 2.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 21 fractional works · 76.7% of its workMedicine: 20 fractional works · 72.0% of its workSurgery: 14 fractional works · 49.0% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 3 fractional works · 10.8% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 4.5% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 15.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 5.2% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 8.2% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 4.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Energy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKGelenkpunkt28fractional works, 2022-now
Physical Sciences8%Health Sciences77%Social Sciences15%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2072.0%
    2. Health Professions14.7%
    1. Arts and Humanities15.2%
    2. Social Sciences14.5%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance12.6%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting01.8%
    5. Psychology01.1%
    1. Engineering26.5%
    2. Environmental Science00.8%
    3. Computer Science00.5%
    4. Energy00.3%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Gelenkpunkt specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Medicine takes 3.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. MedicineField · 20.0 works3.7×
  2. Health SciencesDomain · 21.3 works3.3×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.26× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.44× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.78× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.74× its world share, 20 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 1.80× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.23× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.35× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 3.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Medicine3.74×20 works
  2. Arts and Humanities1.80×1 works
  3. Health Professions1.78×1 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.23×1 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting0.56×0 works
  6. Engineering0.44×2 works
  7. Psychology0.35×0 works
  8. Social Sciences0.35×1 works
  9. Energy0.26×0 works
  10. Environmental Science0.16×0 works
  11. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.09×0 works
  12. Computer Science0.06×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Gelenkpunkt?

Ranked on the quality score, Elisabeth Abermann, Christian Hoser and Mirco Herbort lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Gelenkpunkt.

  1. 1 Elisabeth Abermann Austria · #235,173 worldwide 1.1k citations · 64 works
  2. 2 Christian Hoser Austria · #446,123 worldwide 3.8k citations · 119 works
  3. 3 Mirco Herbort Austria · #608,111 worldwide 594 citations · 39 works
  4. 4 Caroline Hepperger Austria · #644,890 worldwide 1.2k citations · 30 works
  5. 5 Peter Gföller Austria · #1,625,442 worldwide 760 citations · 28 works
All ranked researchers at Gelenkpunkt

What are the most cited papers from Gelenkpunkt?

The most cited paper from Gelenkpunkt is "Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group" (The Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group, Sean J. Meredith, Thomas Rauer et al., 2020), with 128 citations. Next come "Complications and downsides of the robotic total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review" (120) and "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Result in Lower Graft Rupture Rates but Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes as Compared With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Comparison of 875 Patients" (120).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group The Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group, Sean J. Meredith, Thomas Rauer et al. · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy Open access 28 Apr 2020 128
2 Complications and downsides of the robotic total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review Christian Nogalo, Amit Meena, Elisabeth Abermann et al. · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy ReviewOpen access 18 Jun 2022 120
3 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Result in Lower Graft Rupture Rates but Similar Patient-Reported Outcomes as Compared With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Comparison of 875 Patients Armin Runer, Robert Csapo, Caroline Hepperger et al. · The American Journal of Sports Medicine Jul 2020 120
4 The anterolateral ligament of the knee: A dissection study Armin Runer, Stephan Birkmaier, Mathias Pamminger et al. · The Knee 31 Dec 2015 118
5 There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study Armin Runer, Guido Wierer, Elmar Herbst et al. · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 5 May 2017 117
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Gelenkpunkt?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Complications, Revision Surgery, Total Hip Replacement, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Injury Risk, Arthroplasty and Patient Satisfaction.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 32 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 32 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology7▲ 6.2×9 topics
  2. Complications5▲ 37×3 topics
  3. Revision Surgery5▲ 136×2 topics
  4. Total Hip Replacement5▲ 136×2 topics
  5. Anterior Cruciate Ligament5▲ 404×1 topic
  6. Injury Risk5▲ 404×1 topic
  7. Arthroplasty4▲ 152×2 topics
  8. Patient Satisfaction4▲ 46×1 topic
  9. Total Knee Replacement4▲ 210×1 topic
  10. Biomechanics3▲ 34×5 topics
  11. Rehabilitation2▲ 22×3 topics
  12. Shoulder Function2▲ 96×2 topics
  13. Regeneration2▲ 36×3 topics
  14. Rotator Cuff Tears2▲ 114×1 topic
  15. Shoulder Pathology2▲ 114×1 topic
  16. Risk Factors2▲ 5.6×4 topics
  17. Injury Prevention2▲ 43×2 topics
  18. Growth Factors1▲ 40×2 topics
  19. Platelet-Rich Plasma1▲ 74×2 topics
  20. Surgical Management1▲ 12×2 topics
  21. Economic Growth1▲ 5.6×5 topics
  22. Extracellular Matrix1▲ 26×1 topic
  23. Muscle Injuries1▲ 75×1 topic
  24. Sports Injury1▲ 75×1 topic
  25. Stem Cells1▲ 18×2 topics
  26. Tendon1▲ 146×1 topic
  27. Quality of Life1▲ 3.0×5 topics
  28. Social Support1▲ 7.0×4 topics
  29. Acromioclavicular Joint1▲ 153×1 topic
  30. Clavicle Fractures1▲ 153×1 topic
  31. Foot Strike Patterns1▲ 98×1 topic
  32. Running Injuries1▲ 98×1 topic

Which research topics does Gelenkpunkt publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques, Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Shoulder Injury and Treatment and Tendon Structure and Treatment.

  1. 1 Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques Surgery 5 works
  2. 2 Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Surgery 4 works
  3. 3 Shoulder Injury and Treatment Surgery 2 works
  4. 4 Tendon Structure and Treatment Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1 works
  5. 5 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1 works
  6. 6 Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries Epidemiology 1 works
  7. 7 Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies Biomedical Engineering 1 works
  8. 8 Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Surgery 1 works
  9. 9 Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms Rheumatology 1 works
  10. 10 Trauma Management and Diagnosis Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available59.0%not open41.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors64.3%domestic only35.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Gelenkpunkt's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 15% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Gelenkpunkt as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00017% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Gelenkpunkt0.000073% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Gelenkpunkt over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Innsbruck

All research institutions in Innsbruck

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Gelenkpunkt. Posts are plain text and can be reported.