Science Explorer Interactive view Map
University · Guangzhou · China

Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts

In research, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts stands highest in Computer Science (#872 of 4,667 worldwide), Social Sciences (#3,077 of 10,521 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#6,024 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design — Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design is 121.3× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#7,576
of 28,054 · #19,553 all time
Rank in China
#1,518
of 3,058
Research works
532
▲ 333% vs 2013–17
Citations
1.2k
2.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
16.4%
record average 16.5%
Open access
41%
world 28%

What is Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Computer ScienceField #872 of 4,667 10.4%89 #2188
Social SciencesDomain #3,077 of 10,521 23.1%116 #7904
Physical SciencesDomain #6,024 of 12,888 10.7%148 #13345

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Computer Science#2,188 #872
  2. Social Sciences#7,904 #3,077
  3. Physical Sciences#13,345 #6,024
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design takes 121.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided DesignSubfield · 29.3 works121×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.17× its world share, 2 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.96× its world share, 9 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 3.90× its world share, 89 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.11× its world share, 5 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.78× its world share, 34 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.03× its world share, 15 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.13× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.46× its world share, 2 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.16× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.59× its world share, 4 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.23× its world share, 13 worksMedicineNursing: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.40× its world share, 20 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.59× its world share, 15 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.42× its world share, 4 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.42× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 3.24× its world share, 29 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.21× its world share, 45 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Computer Science, 3.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, Multimedia Technology, Human-Computer Interaction, Digital Media Technology, Visual Communication Design, Deep Learning and Cultural Heritage.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Artificial Intelligence46▲ 11×23 topics
  2. Virtual Reality44▲ 30×9 topics
  3. Deep Learning34▲ 3.4×40 topics
  4. Multimedia Technology32▲ 165×2 topics
  5. Human-Computer Interaction31▲ 60×4 topics
  6. Digital Media Technology29▲ 239×1 topic
  7. Visual Communication Design29▲ 239×1 topic
  8. Machine Learning18▲ 1.87×30 topics
  9. Education15▲ 2.9×16 topics
  10. Sustainability13▲ 1.80×23 topics
  11. Innovation12▲ 4.0×11 topics
  12. Internet of Things12▲ 4.7×16 topics
  13. Healthcare12▲ 3.5×7 topics
  14. Cultural Heritage11▲ 6.9×14 topics
  15. Remote Sensing10▲ 2.9×11 topics
  16. Urban Development10▲ 9.7×7 topics
  17. Embodiment9▲ 17×3 topics
  18. Data Mining9▲ 4.2×10 topics
  19. Big Data9▲ 3.4×15 topics
  20. Learning Outcomes9▲ 7.3×2 topics
  21. User Satisfaction9▲ 16×2 topics
  22. Emotion9▲ 15×6 topics
  23. Neuroscience9▲ 10×5 topics
  24. Cloud Computing9▲ 11×7 topics
  25. Creativity8▲ 45×2 topics
  26. Product Design8▲ 19×2 topics
  27. Social Interaction8▲ 6.6×5 topics
  28. Color Psychology8▲ 78×1 topic
  29. Consumer Preferences8▲ 34×2 topics
  30. Kansei Engineering8▲ 78×1 topic
  31. User Experience8▲ 31×3 topics
  32. Emotional Responses7▲ 21×3 topics
  33. Cancer Treatment7▲ 9.9×2 topics
  34. Herbal Medicine7▲ 8.1×2 topics
  35. Immersion7▲ 34×1 topic
  36. Integrative Medicine7▲ 39×1 topic
  37. Presence7▲ 34×1 topic
  38. Traditional Chinese Medicine7▲ 19×1 topic
  39. Psychology6▲ 16×3 topics
  40. Participatory Design6▲ 40×2 topics

Which research topics does Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Digital Media and Visual Art, Color perception and design, Medical Research and Treatments and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts.

  1. 1 Digital Media and Visual Art Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 29 works
  2. 2 Color perception and design Social Psychology 8 works
  3. 3 Medical Research and Treatments Complementary and alternative medicine 7 works
  4. 4 Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts Human-Computer Interaction 7 works
  5. 5 Aesthetic Perception and Analysis Cognitive Neuroscience 6 works
  6. 6 Creativity in Education and Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5 works
  7. 7 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 4 works
  8. 8 Cultural Industries and Urban Development Urban Studies 4 works
  9. 9 Digital Marketing and Social Media Sociology and Political Science 4 works
  10. 10 Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation Archeology 4 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available40.9%not open59.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors12.2%domestic only87.8%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 333% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Guangzhou

All research institutions in Guangzhou

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.