Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Hospital / health system · Zwolle · Netherlands

Innofeet

Research works
70
▲ 3% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.5k
35.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
43%
world 40%
International
22%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Innofeet is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Innofeet work in?

In all years, 52% of research at Innofeet is in Health Sciences, 29% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (43%), Psychology (19%), Neuroscience (12%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 37 fractional works · 52.2% of its workMedicine: 30 fractional works · 43.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 6 fractional works · 8.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 6 fractional works · 8.3% of its workEpidemiology: 4 fractional works · 6.2% of its workPhysiology: 4 fractional works · 5.1% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workRehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDermatology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth Professions: 6 fractional works · 8.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 5.4% of its workPharmacy: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 20 fractional works · 29.0% of its workPsychology: 13 fractional works · 19.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 7 fractional works · 10.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 3 fractional works · 4.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 7.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workClassics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 12 fractional works · 17.3% of its workNeuroscience: 8 fractional works · 11.9% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 6 fractional works · 8.3% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBehavioral Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 5.3% of its workGenetics: 3 fractional works · 4.1% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKInnofeet70fractional works, all years
Life Sciences17%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences52%Social Sciences29%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine3043.2%
    2. Health Professions68.5%
    3. Dentistry00.2%
    4. Nursing00.1%
    5. Veterinary00.1%
    1. Psychology1319.0%
    2. Social Sciences57.6%
    3. Arts and Humanities22.3%
    4. Decision Sciences00.1%
    1. Neuroscience811.9%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology45.3%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.2%
    1. Engineering10.8%
    2. Computer Science00.2%
    3. Chemistry00.2%
    4. Energy00.1%
    5. Environmental Science00.1%
    6. Mathematics00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.63× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.57× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.43× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 1.90× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.99× its world share, 6 worksMedicineNursing: 1.04× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 3.74× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.05× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 9.98× its world share, 5 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.05× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 10.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology9.98×5 works
  2. Veterinary3.74×0 works
  3. Medicine1.99×6 works
  4. Health Professions1.90×1 works
  5. Neuroscience1.57×0 works
  6. Arts and Humanities1.05×0 works
  7. Social Sciences1.05×2 works
  8. Nursing1.04×0 works
  9. Immunology and Microbiology0.67×0 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.63×1 works
  11. Chemistry0.43×0 works
  12. Decision Sciences0.35×0 works
  13. Engineering0.07×0 works
  14. Computer Science0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Innofeet?

Ranked on the quality score, Al W. de Weerd and Wytske A. Hofstra lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Innofeet.

  1. 1 Al W. de Weerd Netherlands · #1,617,851 worldwide 1.9k citations · 36 works
  2. 2 Wytske A. Hofstra Netherlands · #2,469,935 worldwide 885 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Innofeet

What are the most cited papers from Innofeet?

The most cited paper from Innofeet is "A meta-analytic study on the effectiveness of comprehensive ABA-based early intervention programs for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders" (Nienke C. Peters-Scheffer, Robert Didden, Hubert P. L. M. Korzilius et al., 2010), with 421 citations. Next come "How to assess circadian rhythm in humans: A review of literature" (241) and "Pediatric restless legs syndrome diagnostic criteria: an update by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group" (231).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A meta-analytic study on the effectiveness of comprehensive ABA-based early intervention programs for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Nienke C. Peters-Scheffer, Robert Didden, Hubert P. L. M. Korzilius et al. · Research in Autism Open access 26 Apr 2010 421
2 How to assess circadian rhythm in humans: A review of literature Wytske A. Hofstra, Al W. de Weerd · Epilepsy & Behavior 16 Jul 2008 241
3 Pediatric restless legs syndrome diagnostic criteria: an update by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Daniel L. Picchietti, Oliviero Bruni, Al de Weerd et al. · Sleep Medicine Open access 4 Sep 2013 231
4 Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): Electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG) Jean‐Michel Guérit, A. Amantini, Piero Amodio et al. · Neurophysiologie Clinique Apr 2009 148
5 Sleep disturbances in people with epilepsy; prevalence, impact and treatment Esther G.A. van Golde, Therese Gutter, Al W. de Weerd · Sleep Medicine Reviews 14 Apr 2011 147
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Innofeet?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Epidemiology, Mental Health, Prevalence, Circadian Rhythms, Health Disparities, Genetics and Neurological Disorders.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology11▲ 4.0×28 topics
  2. Quality of Life10▲ 11×18 topics
  3. Mental Health8▲ 9.8×15 topics
  4. Prevalence7▲ 25×6 topics
  5. Circadian Rhythms7▲ 112×2 topics
  6. Health Disparities5▲ 37×3 topics
  7. Inflammation5▲ 3.1×10 topics
  8. Genetics5▲ 9.5×7 topics
  9. Neurological Disorders5▲ 10×7 topics
  10. Down Syndrome5▲ 749×1 topic
  11. Intellectual Disability5▲ 354×1 topic
  12. Meta-Analysis5▲ 12×5 topics
  13. Memory4▲ 22×1 topic
  14. Sleep4▲ 142×1 topic
  15. Alzheimer's Disease4▲ 20×3 topics
  16. Neurobiology4▲ 17×5 topics
  17. Metabolic Syndrome4▲ 6.2×5 topics
  18. Psychometric Evaluation3▲ 61×2 topics
  19. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy3▲ 48×2 topics
  20. Emotion Recognition2▲ 27×2 topics
  21. Insomnia2▲ 75×1 topic
  22. Sleep Duration2▲ 82×1 topic
  23. Ketogenic Diet2▲ 32×1 topic
  24. Low-Carbohydrate Diet2▲ 37×1 topic
  25. Antiepileptic Drugs2▲ 32×2 topics
  26. Social Support2▲ 7.2×5 topics
  27. Epilepsy2▲ 25×3 topics
  28. Resilience2▲ 8.2×5 topics
  29. Surgery2▲ 9.6×2 topics
  30. Neurodevelopmental Disorders2▲ 20×5 topics
  31. Brain Development2▲ 14×2 topics
  32. Classification2▲ 8.1×1 topic
  33. Dendritic Spines2▲ 18×2 topics
  34. Seizures2▲ 39×1 topic
  35. Diagnostic Criteria2▲ 13×2 topics
  36. Pregnancy2▲ 12×2 topics
  37. Self-Efficacy2▲ 14×3 topics
  38. Neuroimaging2▲ 9.0×4 topics
  39. Iron Metabolism2▲ 42×1 topic
  40. Restless Legs Syndrome2▲ 292×1 topic

Which research topics does Innofeet publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Down syndrome and intellectual disability research, Family and Disability Support Research, Disability Education and Employment and Behavioral and Psychological Studies.

  1. 1 Down syndrome and intellectual disability research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
  2. 2 Family and Disability Support Research Clinical Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Disability Education and Employment Safety Research 1 works
  4. 4 Behavioral and Psychological Studies Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
  5. 5 Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending Clinical Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  7. 7 Child Abuse and Trauma Clinical Psychology 0 works
  8. 8 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  9. 9 Traumatic Brain Injury Research Epidemiology 0 works
  10. 10 Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available42.8%not open57.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors21.5%domestic only78.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Innofeet's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 3% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Innofeet as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000060% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Innofeet0.000041% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Innofeet over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Zwolle

All research institutions in Zwolle

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Innofeet. Posts are plain text and can be reported.