Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik
In research, Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik stands highest in Health Sciences (#9,151 of 20,462 worldwide), Life Sciences (#6,949 of 14,347 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#10,428 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,529 of 28,054 · #15,532 all time
- Rank in Germany
- #980 of 1,178
- Research works
- 2.1k ◆ 2% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 16k 7.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 5.6% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 22% world 28%
What is Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #9,151 of 20,462 | 4.3% | 691 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #6,949 of 14,347 | 7.1% | 933 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #10,428 of 16,945 | 13.1% | 332 | |
| Social SciencesField | #6,981 of 10,206 | 14.2% | 132 | |
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #4,401 of 6,031 | 7.4% | 531 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #5,786 of 7,814 | 6.9% | 304 | |
| VeterinaryField | #188 of 242 | 4.0% | 144 | |
| MedicineField | #14,763 of 17,978 | 4.1% | 486 | |
| Animal Science and ZoologySubfield | #415 of 456 | 5.1% | 179 | |
| GeneticsSubfield | #1,544 of 1,665 | 7.7% | 133 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 27.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 27.4×
- Arts and Humanities 6.4×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Psychology 2.3×
- Environmental Science 0.9×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Health Professions 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
- Chemistry 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik?
Ranked on the composite score, Frank T. Magiera, F. Ellendorff and Nahid Parvizi lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik.
- 1 Frank T. Magiera Germany · #38,007 worldwide 529 citations · 88 works
- 2 F. Ellendorff Germany · #273,275 worldwide 86 citations · 54 works
- 3 Nahid Parvizi Germany · #436,186 worldwide 44 citations · 29 works
- 4 F. Elsaesser Germany · #677,239 worldwide 51 citations · 36 works
- 5 Emil Abderhalden Germany · #707,480 worldwide 302 citations · 244 works
- 6 Otto Regenbogen Germany · #958,024 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
- 7 Diedrich Smidt Germany · #964,885 worldwide 65 citations · 81 works
- 8 Franc Klobasa Germany · #1,196,424 worldwide 7 citations · 18 works
- 9 Erhard Kallweit Germany · #1,256,946 worldwide 24 citations · 46 works
- 10 Michael Clemens Schlichting Germany · #1,299,901 worldwide 1 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Identity, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, Governance, History, Gender, Learning and Teaching.
- Bioethics
- Medical Ethics
- End-of-Life Care
- Bildungsungleichheit
- Participation
- Global Capitalism
- Digitalization
- Critique
- Environmental Sustainability
- Competence
- Nationalism
- Leadership
- Neoliberalism
- Narrative
- Memory
- Human Rights
- Innovation
- Globalization
- Governance
- Identity
- Education
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
- History
- Gender
- Learning
- Teaching
- Cultural Studies
- Literature
- Ethnography
- Curriculum
- Trauma
- Didactics
- Crisis Management
- Social Inequality
- Holocaust
- Imperialism
- Policy Change
- Cultural Memory
- Ethnografisches Schreiben
- Sociolinguistics
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education9▲ 5.2×16 topics
- Identity6▲ 9.3×8 topics
- Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse5▲ 132×2 topics
- Governance5▲ 16×4 topics
- History5▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Globalization5▲ 2.5×14 topics
- Gender4▲ 8.7×5 topics
- Innovation4▲ 4.0×9 topics
- Learning4▲ 14×3 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 3.8×10 topics
- Teaching4▲ 31×3 topics
- Memory4▲ 15×4 topics
- Cultural Studies3▲ 9.5×7 topics
- Narrative3▲ 22×3 topics
- Literature3▲ 6.5×6 topics
- Neoliberalism3▲ 9.4×4 topics
- Ethnography3▲ 19×5 topics
- Leadership3▲ 6.8×4 topics
- Curriculum3▲ 33×2 topics
- Nationalism3▲ 6.8×3 topics
- Trauma3▲ 16×4 topics
- Competence3▲ 258×1 topic
- Didactics3▲ 31×2 topics
- Environmental Sustainability3▲ 18×2 topics
- Crisis Management3▲ 64×2 topics
- Critique3▲ 123×2 topics
- Social Inequality3▲ 10×2 topics
- Digitalization2▲ 13×2 topics
- Holocaust2▲ 84×3 topics
- Global Capitalism2▲ 44×1 topic
- Imperialism2▲ 32×1 topic
- Participation2▲ 26×1 topic
- Policy Change2▲ 186×1 topic
- Bildungsungleichheit2▲ 82×1 topic
- Cultural Memory2▲ 49×3 topics
- End-of-Life Care2▲ 20×3 topics
- Ethnografisches Schreiben2▲ 82×1 topic
- Medical Ethics2▲ 18×3 topics
- Sociolinguistics2▲ 13×5 topics
- Bioethics2▲ 63×2 topics
Which research topics does Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education Methods and Technologies, Public Administration and Political Analysis, Economic and Social Issues and Sociology and Education Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education Methods and Technologies Education 3 works
- 2 Public Administration and Political Analysis Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 3 Economic and Social Issues Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 4 Sociology and Education Studies Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 5 Libraries and Information Services Museology 2 works
- 6 German Literature and Culture Studies Literature and Literary Theory 2 works
- 7 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 8 Sports Science and Education History and Philosophy of Science 2 works
- 9 Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 2 works
- 10 Religion, Theology, and Education Religious studies 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 2% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Berlin
- Freie Universität Berlin
- Technische Universität Berlin
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
- Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society
- Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing
- Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute
- Robert Koch Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.