Instytut Techniki Budowlanej
In research, Instytut Techniki Budowlanej stands highest in Engineering (#6,165 of 6,636 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#12,269 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Civil and Structural Engineering and Engineering — Civil and Structural Engineering is 26.9× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #26,106 of 28,054 · #30,724 all time
- Rank in Poland
- #284 of 318
- Research works
- 1.2k ▼ 47% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 4.5k 3.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 34% world 28%
What is Instytut Techniki Budowlanej known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EngineeringField | #6,165 of 6,636 | 7.9% | 76 | #8098 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #12,269 of 12,888 | 8.5% | 98 | #16166 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Instytut Techniki Budowlanej sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Instytut Techniki Budowlanej specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Civil and Structural Engineering takes 26.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Civil and Structural EngineeringSubfield · 35.4 works27×
- EngineeringField · 76.0 works4.5×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Engineering, 4.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Engineering 4.5×
- Environmental Science 2.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.9×
- Materials Science 1.0×
- Chemical Engineering 0.9×
- Decision Sciences 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Energy 0.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities 0.2×
- Psychology 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Instytut Techniki Budowlanej?
Ranked on the composite score, L. Runkiewicz, Paweł Sulik and Michał Piasecki lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Instytut Techniki Budowlanej.
- 1 L. Runkiewicz Poland · #402,914 worldwide 14 citations · 23 works
- 2 Paweł Sulik Poland · #499,670 worldwide 19 citations · 21 works
- 3 Michał Piasecki Poland · #520,649 worldwide 22 citations · 18 works
- 4 J. Sieczkowski Poland · #901,762 worldwide 1 citations · 16 works
- 5 Bartłomiej Sędłak Poland · #1,067,456 worldwide 16 citations · 15 works
- 6 Marta Kadela Poland · #1,181,227 worldwide 17 citations · 15 works
- 7 Wojciech Węgrzyński Poland · #1,471,237 worldwide 18 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Instytut Techniki Budowlanej?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mechanical Properties, Ventilation Systems, Environmental Impact, Fire Resistance, Geotechnical Engineering, Energy Efficiency, Material Properties and Structural Health Monitoring.
- Urban Microclimate
- Cementitious Materials
- Air Quality
- High-Temperature
- CFD Simulation
- CO2 Sequestration
- Fiber Reinforcement
- Building Construction
- Concrete
- Sustainable Architecture
- Ultra-High Performance Concrete
- Construction
- Concrete Structures
- Smoke Control
- Acoustic Emission
- Durability Performance
- Structural Health Monitoring
- Geotechnical Engineering
- Energy Efficiency
- Environmental Impact
- Mechanical Properties
- Ventilation Systems
- Fire Resistance
- Material Properties
- Artificial Neural Networks
- Railway Bridges
- Recycled Materials
- Tunnel Fires
- Steel Construction
- Fiber Reinforced Concrete
- Geopolymer
- Thermal Insulation
- Microstructure
- Renovation Management
- Cultural Heritage
- Fly Ash
- Blast Loading
- Steel Structures
- Alkali-Activated Materials
- Pedestrian Wind Comfort
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mechanical Properties14▲ 13×11 topics
- Environmental Impact11▲ 5.8×13 topics
- Ventilation Systems10▲ 314×2 topics
- Energy Efficiency8▲ 7.5×9 topics
- Fire Resistance8▲ 335×2 topics
- Geotechnical Engineering8▲ 102×3 topics
- Material Properties7▲ 66×3 topics
- Structural Health Monitoring7▲ 81×2 topics
- Artificial Neural Networks7▲ 13×2 topics
- Durability Performance6▲ 60×2 topics
- Railway Bridges6▲ 135×2 topics
- Acoustic Emission6▲ 82×2 topics
- Recycled Materials5▲ 43×2 topics
- Smoke Control5▲ 188×1 topic
- Tunnel Fires5▲ 188×1 topic
- Concrete Structures5▲ 1283×1 topic
- Steel Construction5▲ 1283×1 topic
- Construction5▲ 33×3 topics
- Fiber Reinforced Concrete5▲ 57×1 topic
- Ultra-High Performance Concrete5▲ 57×1 topic
- Geopolymer5▲ 32×2 topics
- Sustainable Architecture5▲ 182×2 topics
- Thermal Insulation5▲ 171×2 topics
- Concrete4▲ 125×2 topics
- Microstructure4▲ 7.8×5 topics
- Building Construction4▲ 2008×1 topic
- Renovation Management4▲ 2008×1 topic
- Fiber Reinforcement4▲ 59×2 topics
- Cultural Heritage4▲ 6.4×4 topics
- CO2 Sequestration4▲ 18×2 topics
- Fly Ash4▲ 32×2 topics
- CFD Simulation4▲ 29×3 topics
- Blast Loading4▲ 72×2 topics
- High-Temperature4▲ 51×1 topic
- Steel Structures4▲ 81×1 topic
- Air Quality3▲ 17×2 topics
- Alkali-Activated Materials3▲ 33×1 topic
- Cementitious Materials3▲ 33×1 topic
- Pedestrian Wind Comfort3▲ 61×1 topic
- Urban Microclimate3▲ 61×1 topic
Which research topics does Instytut Techniki Budowlanej publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Fire dynamics and safety research, Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis, Innovative concrete reinforcement materials and Building energy efficiency and sustainability.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Fire dynamics and safety research Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 5 works
- 2 Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis Civil and Structural Engineering 5 works
- 3 Innovative concrete reinforcement materials Civil and Structural Engineering 5 works
- 4 Building energy efficiency and sustainability Building and Construction 4 works
- 5 Fire effects on concrete materials Civil and Structural Engineering 4 works
- 6 Wind and Air Flow Studies Environmental Engineering 3 works
- 7 Concrete and Cement Materials Research Civil and Structural Engineering 3 works
- 8 Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Building and Construction 3 works
- 9 Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance Building and Construction 3 works
- 10 Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics Ocean Engineering 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Instytut Techniki Budowlanej's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 47% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Warsaw
- University of Warsaw
- Polish Academy of Sciences
- Warsaw University of Technology
- Warsaw University of Life Sciences
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Institute of Physics
- Military University of Technology in Warsaw
- Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.