Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Oslo · Norway

Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter

In research, Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,622 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Arts and Humanities and Political Science and International Relations (Arts and Humanities is 11.7× its share of world research).

iko.no/om-iko/2013/6/facts-on-ikoROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#16,751
of 22,385 · #11,140 all time
Rank in Norway
#95
of 123
Research works
972
▼ 33% vs 2018-21
Citations
1k
1.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.8%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.96×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
20%
world 40%
International
27%
world 18%
Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter

What is Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #5,622 of 9,585 2.1%113 #3495

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter work in?

In 2022-now, 86% of research at Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter is in Social Sciences, 8% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (40%), Arts and Humanities (34%), Psychology (8%). It does 3.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 120 fractional works · 86.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 56 fractional works · 39.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 21 fractional works · 14.7% of its workEducation: 14 fractional works · 10.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 11 fractional works · 8.1% of its workLaw: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workDemography: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 47 fractional works · 33.7% of its workHistory: 13 fractional works · 9.0% of its workReligious studies: 12 fractional works · 8.6% of its workPhilosophy: 10 fractional works · 6.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 3 fractional works · 2.1% of its workArcheology: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMusic: 2 fractional works · 1.4% of its workClassics: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workConservation: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 11 fractional works · 7.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 7 fractional works · 5.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 3 fractional works · 1.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 4 fractional works · 2.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 11 fractional works · 7.8% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workFamily Practice: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Professions: 5 fractional works · 3.6% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 4 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMedical Terminology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 5.0% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArchitecture: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKKirkeligPedagogisk Senter140fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences5%Health Sciences8%Social Sciences86%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences5639.9%
    2. Arts and Humanities4733.7%
    3. Psychology117.9%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting42.7%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance21.5%
    6. Decision Sciences00.2%
    1. Medicine53.7%
    2. Health Professions53.6%
    3. Dentistry00.2%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Environmental Science21.6%
    2. Computer Science21.5%
    3. Engineering21.2%
    4. Materials Science00.2%
    5. Mathematics00.2%
    6. Physics and Astronomy00.1%
    7. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.3%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.3%
    4. Neuroscience00.2%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Arts and Humanities takes 11.7× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Arts and HumanitiesField · 47.2 works12×
  2. Political Science and International RelationsSubfield · 20.6 works9.9×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.19× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.08× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.32× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.37× its world share, 5 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.20× its world share, 5 worksMedicineVeterinary: 1.75× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 11.68× its world share, 47 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.84× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.70× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.60× its world share, 11 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.15× its world share, 56 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 11.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities11.68×47 works
  2. Social Sciences3.15×56 works
  3. Psychology2.60×11 works
  4. Veterinary1.75×0 works
  5. Health Professions1.37×5 works
  6. Business, Management and Accounting0.84×4 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.70×2 works
  8. Dentistry0.49×0 works
  9. Environmental Science0.32×2 works
  10. Immunology and Microbiology0.27×0 works
  11. Decision Sciences0.24×0 works
  12. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.23×0 works
  13. Mathematics0.20×0 works
  14. Medicine0.20×5 works
  15. Computer Science0.19×2 works
  16. Neuroscience0.15×0 works
  17. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.08×0 works
  18. Engineering0.08×2 works
  19. Materials Science0.07×0 works
  20. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.05×0 works
  21. Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
  22. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter?

Ranked on the quality score, Nils Holger Petersen, Sven Rune Havsteen and Nils Holger Petersen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter.

  1. 1 Nils Holger Petersen Norway · #2,121,724 worldwide 358 citations · 555 works
  2. 2 Sven Rune Havsteen Norway · #2,362,879 worldwide 17 citations · 137 works
  3. 3 Nils Holger Petersen Norway · #2,879,247 worldwide 0 citations · 24 works
  4. 4 Brian W. Nail Norway · #3,025,940 worldwide 10 citations · 27 works
  5. 5 Mette Birkedal Bruun Norway · #3,038,046 worldwide 137 citations · 105 works
  6. 6 Barry McGibbon Norway · #3,304,403 worldwide 27 citations · 20 works
  7. 7 Sven Rune Havsteen Norway · #3,364,937 worldwide 0 citations · 26 works
  8. 8 Nils Holger Petersen Norway · #3,512,122 worldwide 0 citations · 142 works
  9. 9 Martin Schwarz Lausten Norway · #3,689,602 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
  10. 10 Miriam Have Watts Norway · #3,707,821 worldwide 0 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter

What are the most cited papers from Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter?

The most cited paper from Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter is "Outcome after knee dislocations: a 2–9 years follow‐up of 85 consecutive patients" (Lars Fredrik Engebretsen, May Arna Risberg, Ben Robertson et al., 2009), with 208 citations. Next come "Rate-Determining Factors in Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions" (129) and "Bacterial vaginosis: a double‐blind randomized trial of the effect of treatment of the sexual partner" (117).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Outcome after knee dislocations: a 2–9 years follow‐up of 85 consecutive patients Lars Fredrik Engebretsen, May Arna Risberg, Ben Robertson et al. · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 15 Jul 2009 208
2 Rate-Determining Factors in Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions Israel Fernández, Gernot Frenking, Einar Uggerud · The Journal of Organic Chemistry 30 Mar 2010 129
3 Bacterial vaginosis: a double‐blind randomized trial of the effect of treatment of the sexual partner Mogens Vejtorp, ANNE CATHRINE BOLLERUP, Lissie Vejtorp et al. · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Sep 1988 117
4 Spectroscopic Identification of a Bidentate Binding Motif in the Anionic Magnesium–CO2 Complex ([ClMgCO2]−) Glenn B. S. Miller, Tim K. Esser, Harald Knorke et al. · Angewandte Chemie International Edition 27 Oct 2014 84
5 The natural factor formulation of the stiffness for the matrix displacement method John Argyris, O.E. Brønlund · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1975 55
All 69 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Religion, Constitutionalism, Human Rights, Secularism, Democracy, Religious Education, Identity and Ethics.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Religion18▲ 27×10 topics
  2. Constitutionalism15▲ 119×3 topics
  3. Globalization12▲ 4.4×20 topics
  4. Human Rights12▲ 8.4×8 topics
  5. Secularism12▲ 81×3 topics
  6. Democracy11▲ 23×3 topics
  7. Religious Education10▲ 46×2 topics
  8. Identity10▲ 10×7 topics
  9. Ethics10▲ 14×13 topics
  10. Education10▲ 4.0×17 topics
  11. Judicial Review9▲ 79×2 topics
  12. Citizenship9▲ 54×2 topics
  13. Diversity9▲ 38×2 topics
  14. ECHR9▲ 190×1 topic
  15. European Legal Systems9▲ 190×1 topic
  16. Cultural9▲ 132×2 topics
  17. Inclusion9▲ 44×2 topics
  18. Reformation9▲ 230×2 topics
  19. Multiculturalism9▲ 34×1 topic
  20. Schools9▲ 483×1 topic
  21. Spirituality8▲ 61×4 topics
  22. Church History8▲ 140×3 topics
  23. Literature8▲ 10×8 topics
  24. International Relations8▲ 23×5 topics
  25. Medieval8▲ 155×2 topics
  26. Social Justice8▲ 9.1×7 topics
  27. Philosophy8▲ 12×9 topics
  28. Theology7▲ 58×5 topics
  29. Archaeology7▲ 41×3 topics
  30. Dementia Care7▲ 419×2 topics
  31. Cultural Exchange7▲ 39×2 topics
  32. Rituals7▲ 61×2 topics
  33. Interactional Expertise7▲ 446×1 topic
  34. Scandinavia7▲ 351×1 topic
  35. Tacit Knowledge7▲ 103×1 topic
  36. Viking Age7▲ 351×1 topic
  37. Social Change7▲ 39×3 topics
  38. African Christianity7▲ 203×2 topics
  39. Legal History5▲ 137×1 topic
  40. Religious Influence5▲ 213×1 topic

Which research topics does Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: European and International Law Studies, Religious Education and Schools, Historical and Archaeological Studies and Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research.

European and International Law Studies: 9 fractional worksReligious Education and Schools: 9 fractional worksHistorical and Archaeolo…7Historical and Archaeological Studies: 7 fractional worksEducation, Healthcare an…7Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research: 7 fractional worksHistorical Legal Studies and Society: 5 fractional worksPentecostalism and Christianity Studies: 4 fractional worksKierkegaardian Philosoph…4Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence: 4 fractional worksReformation and Early Modern Christianity: 4 fractional worksHistorical Influence and Diplomacy: 4 fractional worksMedia, Religion, Digital Communication: 3 fractional works
Political Science and International RelationsEducationHistorySocial Psychology2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 9 works
  2. 2 Religious Education and Schools Education 9 works
  3. 3 Historical and Archaeological Studies History 7 works
  4. 4 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 7 works
  5. 5 Historical Legal Studies and Society Political Science and International Relations 5 works
  6. 6 Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies Religious studies 4 works
  7. 7 Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence Philosophy 4 works
  8. 8 Reformation and Early Modern Christianity History 4 works
  9. 9 Historical Influence and Diplomacy Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  10. 10 Media, Religion, Digital Communication Philosophy 3 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available19.5%not open80.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors27.1%domestic only72.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 33% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00023% in 2024.

still counting0.0050%0.010%Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter0.00029% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%all institutions10.0% in 2023Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter2.5% in 20232020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 7.5% in 2011.

Other research institutions in Oslo

All research institutions in Oslo

Share Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter's ranking

Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter on Science Explorer

A card with Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Kirkelig Pedagogisk Senter. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.