Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Merrimack · United States

Nanocomp Technologies (United States)

Research works
51
▲ 33% vs 2018-21
Citations
545
10.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.3%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
28%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Nanocomp Technologies (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Nanocomp Technologies (United States) work in?

In all years, 89% of research at Nanocomp Technologies (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 6% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (52%), Materials Science (27%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (4%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 45 fractional works · 89.2% of its workEngineering: 26 fractional works · 52.1% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 15 fractional works · 28.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 6.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 5.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 14 fractional works · 26.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 8 fractional works · 16.3% of its workCeramics and Composites: 2 fractional works · 3.3% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workGeophysics: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 5.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 4.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workStructural Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.8% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKNanocompTechnologies…51fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences89%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences4%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering2652.1%
    2. Materials Science1426.6%
    3. Environmental Science12.2%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences12.0%
    5. Computer Science11.9%
    6. Physics and Astronomy11.8%
    7. Chemistry11.4%
    8. Energy00.6%
    9. Chemical Engineering00.4%
    10. Mathematics00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology24.4%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.0%
    3. Neuroscience00.2%
    1. Business, Management and Accounting11.8%
    2. Psychology01.0%
    3. Social Sciences00.5%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.3%
    5. Decision Sciences00.2%
    1. Medicine11.2%
    2. Dentistry00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.44× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemistry: 1.32× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEarth and Planetary Sciences: 6.70× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 2.09× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 13.09× its world share, 4 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.17× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDecision Sciences: 1.43× its world share, 0 worksDecision Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Materials Science, 13.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Materials Science13.09×4 works
  2. Earth and Planetary Sciences6.70×1 works
  3. Engineering2.09×2 works
  4. Decision Sciences1.43×0 works
  5. Chemistry1.32×0 works
  6. Mathematics1.17×0 works
  7. Energy0.75×0 works
  8. Environmental Science0.56×0 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.44×0 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.39×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Nanocomp Technologies (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Mark W. Schauer lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nanocomp Technologies (United States).

  1. 1 Mark W. Schauer United States · #1,691,234 worldwide 1.2k citations · 50 works
All ranked researchers at Nanocomp Technologies (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Nanocomp Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Nanocomp Technologies (United States) is "Ultra Strong Silicon-Coated Carbon Nanotube Nonwoven Fabric as a Multifunctional Lithium-Ion Battery Anode" (Kara Evanoff, Jim Benson, Mark W. Schauer et al., 2012), with 177 citations. Next come "Intense pulsed light induced platinum–gold alloy formation on carbon nanotubes for non-enzymatic glucose detection" (141) and "Carbon Nanotube–CoF2 Multifunctional Cathode for Lithium Ion Batteries: Effect of Electrolyte on Cycle Stability" (99).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Ultra Strong Silicon-Coated Carbon Nanotube Nonwoven Fabric as a Multifunctional Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Kara Evanoff, Jim Benson, Mark W. Schauer et al. · ACS Nano 17 Oct 2012 177
2 Intense pulsed light induced platinum–gold alloy formation on carbon nanotubes for non-enzymatic glucose detection Jong Eun Ryu, Kyung-Hyun Kim, Hak‐Sung Kim et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics 17 Jul 2010 141
3 Carbon Nanotube–CoF2 Multifunctional Cathode for Lithium Ion Batteries: Effect of Electrolyte on Cycle Stability Xinran Wang, Wentian Gu, Jung Tae Lee et al. · Small Open access 30 Jul 2015 99
4 Coatings and surface modifications imparting antimicrobial activity to orthopedic implants Roli Kargupta, Sangho Bok, Charles M. Darr et al. · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 28 May 2014 83
5 Carbon nanotubes with platinum nano-islands as glucose biofuel cell electrodes Jong Eun Ryu, Hak‐Sung Kim, H. Thomas Hahn et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics 28 Nov 2009 72
All 69 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Nanocomp Technologies (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Biosensors, Graphene, Nanotubes, Nanocomposites, Integrated Circuits, Optical Modulators, Silicon Photonics and Properties.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Biosensors6▲ 19×7 topics
  2. Graphene4▲ 14×9 topics
  3. Nanotubes4▲ 64×4 topics
  4. Nanocomposites4▲ 9.2×8 topics
  5. Integrated Circuits4▲ 30×2 topics
  6. Optical Modulators3▲ 32×1 topic
  7. Properties3▲ 57×2 topics
  8. Silicon Photonics3▲ 43×1 topic
  9. Synthesis3▲ 11×2 topics
  10. Carbon3▲ 80×1 topic
  11. Composites3▲ 82×1 topic
  12. Carbon Nanotubes3▲ 17×5 topics
  13. Optical Interconnects3▲ 75×1 topic
  14. Semiconductor Lasers3▲ 62×1 topic
  15. Graphene Oxide3▲ 56×2 topics
  16. Sintering3▲ 34×2 topics
  17. Spark Plasma Sintering3▲ 46×2 topics
  18. Nanoparticles3▲ 3.8×9 topics
  19. Two-Dimensional Materials3▲ 30×2 topics
  20. Lithium-ion Batteries2▲ 19×3 topics
  21. Chemical Vapor Deposition2▲ 59×1 topic
  22. Energy Storage2▲ 11×4 topics
  23. Mechanical Properties2▲ 4.9×6 topics
  24. Raman Spectroscopy2▲ 19×1 topic
  25. Composite Materials2▲ 20×2 topics
  26. Optical Fiber2▲ 33×2 topics
  27. Cathode Materials2▲ 19×2 topics
  28. Nanostructures2▲ 8.2×8 topics
  29. Ceramic Materials2▲ 33×2 topics
  30. High-Temperature Applications2▲ 54×1 topic
  31. Nanocrystalline Ceramics2▲ 54×1 topic
  32. Battery Materials2▲ 30×1 topic
  33. Nanostructured Anodes2▲ 30×1 topic
  34. Microstructure1▲ 5.6×3 topics
  35. Solar Cells1▲ 8.1×4 topics
  36. Microwave Photonics1▲ 20×1 topic
  37. Nanostructured Materials1▲ 12×2 topics
  38. Photonic Signal Processing1▲ 55×1 topic
  39. Coherent Detection1▲ 35×1 topic
  40. Lab-on-a-Chip1▲ 16×4 topics

Which research topics does Nanocomp Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis, Advanced materials and composites, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques and Material Properties and Applications.

  1. 1 Advanced ceramic materials synthesis Ceramics and Composites 1 works
  2. 2 Advanced materials and composites Mechanical Engineering 1 works
  3. 3 Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques Geophysics 0 works
  4. 4 Material Properties and Applications General Materials Science 0 works
  5. 5 Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques Surfaces, Coatings and Films 0 works
  6. 6 Seismic Waves and Analysis Geophysics 0 works
  7. 7 Synthesis and properties of polymers Polymers and Plastics 0 works
  8. 8 Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research Materials Chemistry 0 works
  10. 10 Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry Materials Chemistry 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available27.8%not open72.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors25.2%domestic only74.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Nanocomp Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 33% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nanocomp Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000046% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Nanocomp Technologies (United States)0.000062% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Nanocomp Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Merrimack

All research institutions in Merrimack

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Nanocomp Technologies (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.