Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Government institution · Canberra · Australia

National Blood Authority

Research works
12
fractional, all time
Citations
49
4.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
30%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: National Blood Authority is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does National Blood Authority work in?

In all years, 51% of research at National Blood Authority is in Health Sciences, 27% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (46%), Computer Science (12%), Business, Management and Accounting (11%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 6 fractional works · 51.4% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 45.6% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 12.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 8.0% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 6.1% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 26.8% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 11.3% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 11.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 3.8% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 13.4% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 11.5% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 8.7% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workALL ITS WORKNational BloodAuthority12fractional works, all years
Life Sciences8%Physical Sciences13%Health Sciences51%Social Sciences27%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine545.6%
    2. Health Professions15.8%
    1. Business, Management and Accounting111.3%
    2. Arts and Humanities15.8%
    3. Social Sciences15.8%
    4. Decision Sciences03.8%
    1. Computer Science111.5%
    2. Engineering01.9%
    1. Immunology and Microbiology14.6%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.4%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.7%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from National Blood Authority?

The most cited paper from National Blood Authority is "Iron-deficiency anaemia in premenopausal women" (DJ Unsworth, FJ Lock, R.F. Harvey, 1999), with 33 citations. Next come "Incidence of seroconversion to positivity for hepatitis C antibody in repeat blood donors in England, 1993-5" (29) and "Assessment of outcomes" (24).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Iron-deficiency anaemia in premenopausal women DJ Unsworth, FJ Lock, R.F. Harvey · The Lancet Mar 1999 33
2 Incidence of seroconversion to positivity for hepatitis C antibody in repeat blood donors in England, 1993-5 Kate Soldan, Jeffrey A.J. Barbara, J Heptonstall · BMJ Open access 9 May 1998 29
3 Assessment of outcomes Victor S. Blanchette, Brian O’Mahony, L. McJames et al. · Haemophilia Open access 25 Apr 2014 24
4 The Dublin Consensus Statement on vital issues relating to the collection of blood and plasma and the manufacture of plasma products B. O. Mahony, A. Turner · Vox Sanguinis 11 Feb 2010 23
5 The Dublin Consensus Statement 2011 on vital issues relating to the collection and provision of blood components and plasma‐derived medicinal products Brian O’Mahony, A. Turner · Vox Sanguinis Aug 2011 18
All 18 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does National Blood Authority publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders, Blood donation and transfusion practices and Blood groups and transfusion.

  1. 1 Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders Genetics 0 works
  2. 2 Blood donation and transfusion practices Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
  3. 3 Blood groups and transfusion Hematology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available23.9%not open76.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors29.7%domestic only70.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has National Blood Authority's research output changed?

199520002005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Blood Authority as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000025% in 2017.

0.00020%0.00040%National Blood Authority0.0000061% in 202319801990200020102020

Fractional works of National Blood Authority over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Canberra

All research institutions in Canberra

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about National Blood Authority. Posts are plain text and can be reported.