National Foundation for Cancer Research
In research, National Foundation for Cancer Research stands highest in Medicine (#858 of 17,978 worldwide), Health Sciences (#1,081 of 20,462 worldwide) and Life Sciences (#1,916 of 14,347 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #3,069 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #781 of 8,685
- Research works
- 1.1k ▲ 26% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 92k 86.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 34% world 28%
What is National Foundation for Cancer Research known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedicineField | #858 of 17,978 | 40.4% | 413 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #1,081 of 20,462 | 40.1% | 425 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #1,916 of 14,347 | 43.1% | 515 | |
| Molecular BiologySubfield | #1,055 of 4,961 | 43.1% | 263 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #1,714 of 7,814 | 43.6% | 420 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Foundation for Cancer Research sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Immunology and Microbiology 4.0×
- Medicine 3.2×
- Dentistry 2.5×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.4×
- Physics and Astronomy 2.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Social Sciences 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at National Foundation for Cancer Research?
Ranked on the composite score, Eva Engvall, Magnus Pfahl and Erkki Ruoslahti lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Foundation for Cancer Research.
- 1 Eva Engvall United States · #16,329 worldwide 1.7k citations · 41 works
- 2 Magnus Pfahl United States · #148,344 worldwide 186 citations · 23 works
- 3 Erkki Ruoslahti United States · #173,938 worldwide 408 citations · 18 works
- 4 Edward J. Modest United States · #188,065 worldwide 170 citations · 32 works
- 5 G. E. Foley United States · #193,745 worldwide 152 citations · 21 works
- 6 Takaaki Sato United States · #202,597 worldwide 185 citations · 24 works
- 7 Michael D. Pierschbacher United States · #236,240 worldwide 421 citations · 16 works
- 8 Johannes Meienhofer United States · #357,423 worldwide 143 citations · 36 works
- 9 Bhupinder Singh United States · #516,146 worldwide 72 citations · 33 works
- 10 W. H. Fishman United States · #595,201 worldwide 68 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at National Foundation for Cancer Research?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy, Epidemiology, Human Papillomavirus, Immunotherapy, Prognosis, Prognostic Factors and Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
- Prognostic Factors
- Prognosis
- Human Papillomavirus
- Chemotherapy
- Epidemiology
- Radiotherapy
- Immunotherapy
- Risk Factors
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 9 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 9 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology2▲ 2.7×13 topics
- Chemotherapy2▲ 9.5×8 topics
- Radiotherapy2▲ 17×6 topics
- Human Papillomavirus1▲ 51×2 topics
- Immunotherapy1▲ 8.5×9 topics
- Prognosis1▲ 17×3 topics
- Risk Factors1▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Prognostic Factors1▲ 12×10 topics
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma1▲ 57×2 topics
Which research topics does National Foundation for Cancer Research publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Head and Neck Cancer Studies, Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics and Higher Education and Employability.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Head and Neck Cancer Studies Otorhinolaryngology 1 works
- 2 Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 3 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 1 works
- 4 Higher Education and Employability Education 0 works
- 5 Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Epidemiology 0 works
- 6 Cervical Cancer and HPV Research Epidemiology 0 works
- 7 Epigenetics and DNA Methylation Molecular Biology 0 works
- 8 Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers Oncology 0 works
- 9 Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
- 10 Protein Degradation and Inhibitors Molecular Biology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has National Foundation for Cancer Research's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 26% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Bethesda
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Lockheed Martin (United States)
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.