National Park Service
In research, National Park Service stands highest in Environmental Science (#1,115 of 3,334 worldwide), Physical Sciences (#5,558 of 10,670 worldwide) and Ecology (#340 of 600 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atmospheric Science (Ecology is 28.3× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #7,113 of 22,385 · #3,336 all time
- Rank in United States
- #948 of 3,332
- Research works
- 3.1k ▼ 17% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 70k 22.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.89× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 36% world 40%
- International
- 11% world 18%
What is National Park Service known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental ScienceField | #1,115 of 3,334 | 6.7% | 183 | #849 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,558 of 10,670 | 6.4% | 254 | #3239 | |
| EcologySubfield | #340 of 600 | 7.1% | 84 | #395 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Park Service sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Environmental Science#849 #1,115
- Physical Sciences#3,239 #5,558
- Ecology#395 #340
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does National Park Service work in?
In 2022-now, 66% of research at National Park Service is in Physical Sciences, 16% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (48%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (13%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (8%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Physical Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences28765.6%
- Environmental Science20847.6%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences5813.3%
- Engineering102.2%
- Computer Science81.8%
- Mathematics10.3%
- Chemistry10.2%
- Energy00.1%
- Materials Science00.1%
- Physics and Astronomy00.0%
- Chemical Engineering00.0%
- Social Sciences6815.6%
- Social Sciences347.7%
- Arts and Humanities163.6%
- Psychology122.6%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance51.1%
- Business, Management and Accounting20.4%
- Decision Sciences10.2%
- Life Sciences6114.0%
- Health Sciences214.8%
- Medicine112.5%
- Health Professions71.5%
- Veterinary30.7%
- Dentistry00.0%
- Nursing00.0%
What does National Park Service specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Ecology takes 28.3× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- EcologySubfield · 97.5 works28×
- Nature and Landscape ConservationSubfield · 24.1 works23×
- Atmospheric ScienceSubfield · 27.0 works14×
- Global and Planetary ChangeSubfield · 32.2 works9.7×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 9.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Environmental Science9.58×208 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences8.50×58 works
- Veterinary5.32×3 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.76×36 works
- Arts and Humanities1.26×16 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.93×4 works
- Psychology0.86×12 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.83×19 works
- Social Sciences0.61×34 works
- Health Professions0.58×7 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.50×5 works
- Computer Science0.23×8 works
- Mathematics0.23×1 works
- Decision Sciences0.17×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.16×0 works
- Neuroscience0.15×1 works
- Engineering0.15×10 works
- Medicine0.13×11 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.13×2 works
- Chemistry0.10×1 works
- Dentistry0.10×0 works
- Chemical Engineering0.07×0 works
- Energy0.07×0 works
- Nursing0.04×0 works
- Materials Science0.02×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.02×0 works
- Environmental Science 9.6×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 8.5×
- Veterinary 5.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.8×
- Arts and Humanities 1.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.9×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.6×
- Health Professions 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.2×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Energy 0.1×
- Nursing 0.0×
- Materials Science 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at National Park Service?
Ranked on the quality score, James A. Comiskey, Abraham J. Miller‐Rushing and Jonathan A. O’Donnell lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Park Service.
- 1
James A. Comiskey
United States · #34,904 worldwide 9.1k citations · 123 works
- 2
Abraham J. Miller‐Rushing
United States · #69,829 worldwide 11k citations · 110 works
- 3
Jonathan A. O’Donnell
United States · #98,641 worldwide 8.1k citations · 163 works
- 4
Kurt M. Fristrup
United States · #113,463 worldwide 7.2k citations · 139 works
- 5
Megan F. McKenna
United States · #142,324 worldwide 4.8k citations · 94 works
- 6
Seth P. D. Riley
United States · #212,310 worldwide 4.7k citations · 79 works
- 7
Patrick J. C. White
United States · #252,231 worldwide 5.8k citations · 200 works
- 8
Daniel J. Mennitt
United States · #291,622 worldwide 1.9k citations · 29 works
- 9
BRIAN R. MITCHELL
United States · #307,474 worldwide 9.9k citations · 165 works
- 10
Raymond M. Sauvajot
United States · #332,433 worldwide 4.3k citations · 28 works
Which keywords describe research at National Park Service?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biodiversity, Conservation, Invasive Species, Population Dynamics, Remote Sensing, Habitat Selection and Trophic Cascades.
- Functional Diversity
- Community Ecology
- Acoustic Communication
- Arctic
- Freshwater Biodiversity
- Predator-Prey Interactions
- Forest Fires
- Soil Properties
- Sagebrush
- Species Richness
- Resilience
- Species Distribution Modeling
- Citizen Science
- Ecosystem Resilience
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Animal Movement
- Trophic Cascades
- Remote Sensing
- Invasive Species
- Biodiversity
- Climate Change
- Conservation
- Population Dynamics
- Habitat Selection
- Conservation Biology
- Occupancy Rates
- Ecosystem
- Model Evaluation
- Ecological Niche
- Ecosystem Services
- Global Change
- Hydrology
- Wildlife Habitat
- Biogeography
- Wildfire Activity
- Cultural Heritage
- Fisheries Sustainability
- Sea-Level Rise
- Biological Invasions
- Sediment Transport
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change137▲ 11×65 topics
- Biodiversity60▲ 18×26 topics
- Conservation52▲ 27×22 topics
- Invasive Species51▲ 28×20 topics
- Population Dynamics47▲ 41×11 topics
- Remote Sensing38▲ 7.1×22 topics
- Habitat Selection29▲ 92×2 topics
- Trophic Cascades28▲ 70×2 topics
- Conservation Biology25▲ 53×4 topics
- Animal Movement25▲ 112×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates25▲ 112×1 topic
- Habitat Fragmentation24▲ 26×5 topics
- Ecosystem24▲ 51×4 topics
- Ecosystem Resilience20▲ 30×5 topics
- Model Evaluation20▲ 36×2 topics
- Citizen Science20▲ 45×3 topics
- Ecological Niche18▲ 69×1 topic
- Species Distribution Modeling18▲ 69×1 topic
- Ecosystem Services18▲ 11×10 topics
- Resilience14▲ 6.7×4 topics
- Global Change14▲ 12×6 topics
- Species Richness14▲ 50×2 topics
- Hydrology14▲ 24×3 topics
- Sagebrush14▲ 219×1 topic
- Wildlife Habitat14▲ 219×1 topic
- Soil Properties13▲ 18×5 topics
- Biogeography13▲ 10×18 topics
- Forest Fires12▲ 64×1 topic
- Wildfire Activity12▲ 64×1 topic
- Predator-Prey Interactions12▲ 35×3 topics
- Cultural Heritage12▲ 5.2×13 topics
- Freshwater Biodiversity12▲ 45×2 topics
- Fisheries Sustainability12▲ 31×2 topics
- Arctic12▲ 24×4 topics
- Sea-Level Rise11▲ 21×5 topics
- Acoustic Communication11▲ 47×3 topics
- Biological Invasions10▲ 26×3 topics
- Community Ecology10▲ 27×2 topics
- Sediment Transport10▲ 14×6 topics
- Functional Diversity9▲ 38×1 topic
Which research topics does National Park Service publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Rangeland and Wildlife Management and Fire effects on ecosystems.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 25 works
- 2 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 18 works
- 3 Rangeland and Wildlife Management Ecology 14 works
- 4 Fire effects on ecosystems Global and Planetary Change 12 works
- 5 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 9 works
- 6 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 9 works
- 7 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 8 works
- 8 Climate change and permafrost Atmospheric Science 7 works
- 9 Cryospheric studies and observations Atmospheric Science 6 works
- 10 American Environmental and Regional History Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 6 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has National Park Service's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 17% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Park Service as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0016% in 2024.
Fractional works of National Park Service over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 17.0% in 2003.
Other research institutions in Washington
- United States Department of Defense
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- United States Department of Agriculture
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- United States Department of Health and Human Services
- Georgetown University
- George Washington University
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about National Park Service. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
