National Parks Board
In research, National Parks Board stands highest in Life Sciences (#3,617 of 6,403 worldwide), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (#2,412 of 3,157 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#8,685 of 10,670 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology (Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics is 50.4× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #15,546 of 22,385 · #18,239 all time
- Rank in Singapore
- #49 of 61
- Research works
- 703 ▲ 18% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 10k 14.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.2% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.90× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 65% world 40%
- International
- 47% world 18%
What is National Parks Board known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life SciencesDomain | #3,617 of 6,403 | 3.6% | 120 | #4547 | |
| Agricultural and Biological SciencesField | #2,412 of 3,157 | 3.9% | 83 | #3300 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,685 of 10,670 | 7.9% | 75 | #10103 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where National Parks Board sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Life Sciences#4,547 #3,617
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences#3,300 #2,412
- Physical Sciences#10,103 #8,685
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does National Parks Board work in?
In 2022-now, 59% of research at National Parks Board is in Life Sciences, 36% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (41%), Environmental Science (27%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (14%). It does 4.1× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
- Life Sciences13058.6%
- Physical Sciences7935.6%
- Environmental Science5926.9%
- Engineering93.9%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences62.9%
- Materials Science21.1%
- Mathematics10.3%
- Computer Science10.3%
- Chemistry00.2%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Health Sciences73.2%
- Medicine52.4%
- Veterinary10.6%
- Health Professions10.3%
- Social Sciences62.6%
- Social Sciences31.5%
- Psychology21.0%
- Arts and Humanities00.0%
What does National Parks Board specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics takes 50.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsSubfield · 52.2 works50×
- EcologySubfield · 27.0 works16×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 18 fields, with their numbers
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences8.55×90 works
- Environmental Science5.41×59 works
- Veterinary4.20×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics3.65×3 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.68×32 works
- Immunology and Microbiology2.40×5 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.84×6 works
- Psychology0.34×2 works
- Materials Science0.32×2 works
- Engineering0.26×9 works
- Mathematics0.22×1 works
- Medicine0.12×5 works
- Social Sciences0.12×3 works
- Health Professions0.11×1 works
- Chemistry0.10×0 works
- Computer Science0.03×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.03×0 works
- Arts and Humanities0.01×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8.6×
- Environmental Science 5.4×
- Veterinary 4.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 3.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology 2.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.8×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Health Professions 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Computer Science 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
- Arts and Humanities 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at National Parks Board?
Ranked on the quality score, Angelia Sia, Daniel C. Thomas and Benjamin P. Y.‐H. Lee lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Parks Board.
- 1
Angelia Sia
Singapore · #444,324 worldwide 4.5k citations · 87 works
- 2
Daniel C. Thomas
Singapore · #1,198,093 worldwide 2.5k citations · 87 works
- 3
Benjamin P. Y.‐H. Lee
Singapore · #1,480,704 worldwide 1.5k citations · 58 works
- 4
Malcolm C. K. Soh
Singapore · #1,609,156 worldwide 937 citations · 41 works
- 5
Gillian Su-Wen Khew
Singapore · #1,757,160 worldwide 549 citations · 33 works
- 6
Yee Wen Low
Singapore · #1,799,009 worldwide 548 citations · 59 works
- 7
P Van Wyk
Singapore · #1,882,766 worldwide 789 citations · 16 works
- 8
Lena Chan
Singapore · #1,919,432 worldwide 693 citations · 19 works
- 9
Le Min Choo
Singapore · #2,034,369 worldwide 178 citations · 51 works
- 10
Karenne Tun
Singapore · #2,055,944 worldwide 1.4k citations · 61 works
Which keywords describe research at National Parks Board?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Biogeography, Taxonomy, Molecular Phylogeny, Phylogeny, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Invasive Species and Diversification.
- Decomposition
- Diptera
- Polyploidy
- Plant-Animal Interactions
- Aquatic Insects
- Land Use
- species diversity
- DNA Barcoding
- Population Dynamics
- Antioxidant
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Habitat Fragmentation
- Ecosystem Services
- Gesneriaceae
- molecular systematics
- Angiosperm Phylogeny
- Diversification
- Biodiversity
- Molecular Phylogeny
- Taxonomy
- Biogeography
- Climate Change
- Phylogeny
- Invasive Species
- Phylogenetics
- Flowering Plants
- Evolution
- phylogenetic reconstruction
- Conservation
- Global Change
- Ecosystem Functioning
- Morphology
- Biomonitoring
- Freshwater Biodiversity
- River Restoration
- Medicinal Plants
- Stream Ecosystems
- Pollinator Decline
- Systematics
- molecular data
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Biogeography61▲ 99×17 topics
- Taxonomy32▲ 101×10 topics
- Climate Change29▲ 4.8×34 topics
- Molecular Phylogeny27▲ 73×10 topics
- Phylogeny26▲ 70×15 topics
- Biodiversity25▲ 15×17 topics
- Invasive Species21▲ 23×17 topics
- Diversification21▲ 212×2 topics
- Phylogenetics21▲ 188×2 topics
- Angiosperm Phylogeny20▲ 328×1 topic
- Flowering Plants20▲ 328×1 topic
- molecular systematics18▲ 348×2 topics
- Evolution17▲ 29×13 topics
- Gesneriaceae17▲ 481×1 topic
- phylogenetic reconstruction17▲ 481×1 topic
- Ecosystem Services15▲ 18×7 topics
- Conservation15▲ 15×16 topics
- Habitat Fragmentation14▲ 29×5 topics
- Global Change12▲ 21×4 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation12▲ 14×12 topics
- Ecosystem Functioning10▲ 22×6 topics
- Antioxidant10▲ 6.4×13 topics
- Morphology9▲ 23×6 topics
- Population Dynamics8▲ 15×10 topics
- Biomonitoring8▲ 47×2 topics
- DNA Barcoding8▲ 22×8 topics
- Freshwater Biodiversity8▲ 56×2 topics
- species diversity7▲ 271×2 topics
- River Restoration7▲ 76×2 topics
- Land Use7▲ 59×2 topics
- Medicinal Plants7▲ 8.4×8 topics
- Aquatic Insects7▲ 207×1 topic
- Stream Ecosystems7▲ 207×1 topic
- Plant-Animal Interactions7▲ 40×1 topic
- Pollinator Decline7▲ 40×1 topic
- Polyploidy7▲ 61×3 topics
- Systematics7▲ 152×2 topics
- Diptera7▲ 566×1 topic
- molecular data7▲ 566×1 topic
- Decomposition6▲ 267×1 topic
Which research topics does National Parks Board publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Plant Diversity and Evolution, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology and Plant and animal studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Plant Diversity and Evolution Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 20 works
- 2 Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions Molecular Biology 17 works
- 3 Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology Ecology 7 works
- 4 Plant and animal studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 7 works
- 5 Diptera species taxonomy and behavior Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 7 works
- 6 Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies Insect Science 6 works
- 7 Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies Plant Science 4 works
- 8 Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 4 works
- 9 Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4 works
- 10 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has National Parks Board's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 18% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Parks Board as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00062% in 2024.
Fractional works of National Parks Board over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 10.0% in 2022.
Other research institutions in Singapore
- National University of Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research
- Singapore General Hospital
- Singapore Management University
- Singapore University of Technology and Design
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital
- National University Health System
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about National Parks Board. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
