Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics

Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics is a research topic within Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Science Explorer counts 15k research works in it since 1950. 17.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the phylogeny, evolution, and classification of grasses (Poaceae), with particular emphasis on topics such as apomixis, C4 photosynthesis, reproductive pathways, genetics, and the evolutionary history of bamboos. It explores the genetic control of apomixis, geographical parthenogenesis, polyploidy, and the molecular phylogeny of various grass subfamilies.

  • Phylogeny
  • Grasses
  • Apomixis
  • C4 Photosynthesis
  • Evolution
  • Classification
  • Genetics
  • Reproductive Pathways
  • Bamboos
  • Polyploidy
Research works
15k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
17.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+1%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (300 and 282 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 300 works
  2. 2 India 282 works
  3. 3 United States 179 works
  4. 4 Argentina 125 works
  5. 5 Brazil 112 works
  6. 6 Russia 93 works
  7. 7 Germany 66 works
  8. 8 Mexico 59 works
  9. 9 Spain 53 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 52 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 22.7%India: 21.3%United States: 13.5%Argentina: 9.5%6 others listed: 32.9%23%largest
China300 · 22.7%India282 · 21.3%United States179 · 13.5%Argentina125 · 9.5%6 others listed436 · 32.9%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Botanical Survey of India publishes the most Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research, followed by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Botanical Survey of India India 82 works
  2. 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Argentina 18 works
  3. 3 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew United Kingdom 17 works
  4. 4 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico 13 works
  5. 5 Ilia State University Georgia 13 works
  6. 6 State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe Germany 12 works
  7. 7 Chinese Academy of Sciences China 11 works
  8. 8 Sichuan Agricultural University China 11 works
  9. 9 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China 9 works
  10. 10 Instituto de Botanica Darwinion Argentina 9 works

Who are the leading researchers in Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics include F. Stuart Chapin, B. L. Turner and Rudolf Schmid.

  1. 1 F. Stuart Chapin 2.7k citations
  2. 2 B. L. Turner 2.1k citations
  3. 3 Rudolf Schmid 1.9k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research done?

The largest centres of Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research in 2022–2025 are Kolkata (India), Beijing (China), Buenos Aires (Argentina) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Kolkata.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Kolkata India 87 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 71 works
  3. 3 Buenos Aires Argentina 40 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 23 works
  5. 5 Moscow Russia 23 works
  6. 6 Mexico City Mexico 20 works
  7. 7 Kunming China 18 works
  8. 8 Guangzhou China 16 works
  9. 9 Dehra Dūn India 15 works
  10. 10 Washington D.C. United States 15 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. KolkataIN · 86.6 works23×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics than the world average.

See Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics on the map

Where is the best place to study Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics?

Among universities, judged by research, Nanjing Forestry University, Ilia State University and Sichuan Agricultural University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 16.0333%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Nanjing Forestry University: 8, 36.5%Ilia State University: 12, 4.3%Sichuan Agricultural University: 11, 17.1%University of Chinese Academy of Sciences: 9, 26.7%Instituto de Botanica Darwinion: 9, 6.8%Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 13, 4.8%Nanjing Forestry Uni…University of Chines…Sichuan Agricultural…Ilia State University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Nanjing Forestry University China 55.936.5%9.3×8 -31.4%
2Ilia State University Georgia 45.84.3%84.6×12
3Sichuan Agricultural University China 43.417.1%20.4×11 -35.6%
4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China 36.726.7%2.9×9 +75.1%
5Instituto de Botanica Darwinion Argentina 35.16.8%1308.5×9 -58.1%
6Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico 28.24.8%7.3×13 -28.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 1% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.