Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Omaha · United States

Omaha Community Foundation

omahafoundation.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
5
fractional, all time
Citations
137
26.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.4%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
53%
world 40%
International
14%
world 18%
Omaha Community Foundation

Not ranked overall: Omaha Community Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Omaha Community Foundation work in?

In all years, 42% of research at Omaha Community Foundation is in Health Sciences, 35% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (40%), Engineering (23%), Arts and Humanities (10%).

Health Sciences: 2 fractional works · 41.5% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 40.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 23.2% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 4.2% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 35.2% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 22.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 8.4% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 16.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 9.5% of its workMusic: 0 fractional works · 4.8% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 4.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.4% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 7.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 6.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workALL ITS WORKOmaha CommunityFoundation5fractional works, all years
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences35%Health Sciences42%Social Sciences16%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine240.2%
    2. Health Professions01.3%
    1. Engineering122.7%
    2. Environmental Science06.3%
    3. Materials Science06.3%
    1. Arts and Humanities09.5%
    2. Social Sciences03.4%
    3. Psychology01.7%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.8%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.8%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology06.3%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Immunology and Microbiology: 7.83× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Engineering: 1.05× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 5.31× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.47× its world share, 0 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.44× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 3.27× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Immunology and Microbiology, 7.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Immunology and Microbiology7.83×0 works
  2. Health Professions5.31×0 works
  3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.27×0 works
  4. Medicine2.47×0 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting2.44×0 works
  6. Engineering1.05×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Omaha Community Foundation?

The most cited paper from Omaha Community Foundation is "Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis" (James N. Weinstein, Jon D. Lurie, Tor Devin Tosteson et al., 2007), with 948 citations. Next come "Spirituality, Religiosity, and Health: a Comparison of Physicians’ Attitudes in Brazil, India, and Indonesia" (73) and "Religious/Spiritual Characteristics of Indian and Indonesian Physicians and Their Acceptance of Spirituality in Health care: A Cross-Cultural Comparison" (35).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis James N. Weinstein, Jon D. Lurie, Tor Devin Tosteson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine Open access 30 May 2007 948
2 Spirituality, Religiosity, and Health: a Comparison of Physicians’ Attitudes in Brazil, India, and Indonesia Giancarlo Lucchetti et al. · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 29 May 2015 73
3 Religious/Spiritual Characteristics of Indian and Indonesian Physicians and Their Acceptance of Spirituality in Health care: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan, Azimatul Karimah, Kuntaman Kuntaman et al. · Journal of Religion and Health 19 Jun 2014 35
4 Perspectives of Indian Traditional and Allopathic Professionals on Religion/Spirituality and its Role in Medicine: Basis for Developing an Integrative Medicine Program Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan, Amit Dias, Anil Rane et al. · Journal of Religion and Health 27 Apr 2013 28
5 Indian Health Care Professionals’ Attitude Towards Spiritual Healing and Its Role in Alleviating Stigma of Psychiatric Services Parameshwaran Ramakrishnan, Anil Rane, Amit Dias et al. · Journal of Religion and Health 15 Jan 2014 23
All 10 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Omaha Community Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: CAR-T cell therapy research, Healthcare Policy and Management, Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

  1. 1 CAR-T cell therapy research Oncology 0 works
  2. 2 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  3. 3 Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment Infectious Diseases 0 works
  4. 4 Primary Care and Health Outcomes General Health Professions 0 works
  5. 5 Complement system in diseases Immunology 0 works
  6. 6 Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Hemophilia Treatment and Research Hematology 0 works
  8. 8 Quality and Supply Management Management Information Systems 0 works
  9. 9 Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
  10. 10 Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research Dermatology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available53.4%not open46.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors14.5%domestic only85.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Omaha Community Foundation's research output changed?

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Omaha Community Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000024% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%Omaha Community Foundation0.0000032% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Omaha Community Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Omaha

All research institutions in Omaha

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Omaha Community Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.