Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research is a research topic within Dermatology. Science Explorer counts 20k research works in it since 1950. 10.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the classification, staging, treatment, and prognosis of cutaneous lymphomas, with a specific emphasis on mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. It includes discussions on the WHO-EORTC classification, survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and various treatment options such as bexarotene and denileukin diftitox. The cluster also addresses the incidence patterns, genomic landscape, and molecular profiling of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas.
- Cutaneous Lymphomas
- Mycosis Fungoides
- Sézary Syndrome
- EORTC Classification
- T-Cell Lymphoma
- CD30+ Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas
- Bexarotene Treatment
- Prognostic Factors
- Clinical End Points
- Research works
- 20k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 2.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.3% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +11% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
United States
40% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.3k and 482 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
United States 1.3k works
- 2
China 482 works
- 3
India 262 works
- 4
Italy 205 works
- 5
Germany 205 works
- 6
France 197 works
- 7
Japan 186 works
- 8
Spain 166 works
- 9
Brazil 161 works
- 10
United Kingdom 132 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research?
By volume in 2022-now, Harvard University publishes the most Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research, followed by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and Mayo Clinic.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Harvard University
United States 53 works
- 2
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
United States 50 works
- 3
Mayo Clinic
United States 42 works
- 4
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
India 32 works
- 5
University of Pennsylvania
United States 29 works
- 6
Peking University
China 28 works
- 7
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
United States 27 works
- 8
Inserm
France 26 works
- 9
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
China 26 works
- 10
Cornell University
United States 26 works
Who are the leading researchers in Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research include Gad A. Getz, Matthew M. Meyerson and Hagop M. Kantarjian.
- 1
Gad A. Getz
United States 364k citations
- 2
Matthew M. Meyerson
United States 280k citations
- 3
Hagop M. Kantarjian
United States 273k citations
- 4
Jean‐Louis Vincent
Belgium 262k citations
- 5
Carlo La Vecchia
Italy 258k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research done?
The largest centres of Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research in 2022-now are New York (United States), Beijing (China), Houston (United States) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Houston.
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
New York
United States 98 works
- 2
Beijing
China 96 works
- 3
Houston
United States 69 works
- 4
Paris
France 69 works
- 5
Philadelphia
United States 60 works
- 6
Boston
United States 49 works
- 7
Shanghai
China 45 works
- 8
London
United Kingdom 44 works
- 9
Tokyo
Japan 41 works
- 10
São Paulo
Brazil 41 works
Where it is the local speciality
- HoustonUS · 69.4 works6.5×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research?
Among universities, judged by research, Harvard University, Leiden University and Stanford University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research, country by countryIs Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 11% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.016% in 2024.
Fractional works of Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research. Posts are plain text and can be reported.