- Research works
- 64 ▼ 83% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.4k 22.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.6% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 82% world 40%
- International
- 10% world 18%
Not ranked overall: OpenBiome is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does OpenBiome work in?
In 2022-now, 42% of research at OpenBiome is in Physical Sciences, 32% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (37%), Neuroscience (14%), Decision Sciences (13%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Life Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences1442.0%
- Computer Science1237.0%
- Physics and Astronomy14.1%
- Materials Science00.8%
- Engineering00.1%
- Social Sciences1032.0%
- Decision Sciences413.3%
- Psychology412.3%
- Social Sciences26.4%
- Life Sciences619.6%
- Health Sciences26.4%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 13.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 13 fields, with their numbers
- Decision Sciences13.79×4 works
- Neuroscience8.90×5 works
- Computer Science4.76×12 works
- Psychology4.04×4 works
- Physics and Astronomy1.84×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.81×1 works
- Nursing0.52×0 works
- Social Sciences0.51×2 works
- Medicine0.32×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.31×0 works
- Materials Science0.23×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.11×0 works
- Engineering0.01×0 works
- Decision Sciences 13.8×
- Neuroscience 8.9×
- Computer Science 4.8×
- Psychology 4.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.8×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Social Sciences 0.5×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Engineering 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at OpenBiome?
Ranked on the quality score, Zain Kassam, Majdi Osman and Shrish Budree lead among researchers whose main affiliation is OpenBiome.
- 1
Zain Kassam
United States · #312,129 worldwide 9k citations · 225 works
- 2
Majdi Osman
United States · #550,072 worldwide 36k citations · 77 works
- 3
Shrish Budree
United States · #761,663 worldwide 1.2k citations · 55 works
- 4
Bharat Ramakrishna
United States · #1,141,637 worldwide 418 citations · 18 works
- 5
Ryan J. Elliott
United States · #1,710,947 worldwide 597 citations · 23 works
- 6
Pratik Bhikhubhai Panchal
United States · #1,819,766 worldwide 551 citations · 46 works
- 7
Wing Fei Wong
United States · #1,927,645 worldwide 651 citations · 22 works
- 8
Nancy E. Dubois
United States · #2,267,168 worldwide 630 citations · 31 works
- 9
Gina M. Mendolia
United States · #3,194,497 worldwide 198 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at OpenBiome?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Cognitive Load, Trust, Interpretable Models, Machine Learning Interpretability, Security, Security Policies, Side-Channel Attacks and Automation.
- Performance Prediction
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Artificial Intelligence
- Scientific Workflows
- Predictive Brain Theory
- Extraterrestrial Life
- Astrobiology
- Bioinformatics
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Reputation
- Information Overload
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Automation
- Security Policies
- Machine Learning Interpretability
- Trust
- Cognitive Load
- Interpretable Models
- Security
- Side-Channel Attacks
- Driver Distraction
- Access Control
- Interruptions
- Social Cognition
- Adversarial Examples
- Robustness
- Neural Processing
- Embodied Cognition
- Perceptual Learning
- Reproducibility
- Visual Perception
- Decision Making
- Log Analysis
- Risk Aversion
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 35 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 35 words, with their numbers
- Cognitive Load5▲ 300×2 topics
- Trust5▲ 52×2 topics
- Interpretable Models4▲ 245×1 topic
- Machine Learning Interpretability4▲ 245×1 topic
- Security4▲ 17×2 topics
- Security Policies3▲ 440×1 topic
- Side-Channel Attacks3▲ 181×1 topic
- Automation3▲ 116×1 topic
- Driver Distraction3▲ 207×1 topic
- Multi-Agent Systems3▲ 43×2 topics
- Access Control2▲ 619×1 topic
- Information Overload2▲ 737×1 topic
- Interruptions2▲ 737×1 topic
- Reputation2▲ 198×1 topic
- Social Cognition2▲ 34×2 topics
- Deep Learning2▲ 1.63×2 topics
- Adversarial Examples2▲ 92×1 topic
- Machine Learning2▲ 1.59×3 topics
- Robustness2▲ 92×1 topic
- Bioinformatics1▲ 36×2 topics
- Neural Processing1▲ 70×2 topics
- Astrobiology1▲ 129×1 topic
- Embodied Cognition1▲ 271×1 topic
- Extraterrestrial Life1▲ 188×1 topic
- Perceptual Learning1▲ 82×1 topic
- Predictive Brain Theory1▲ 271×1 topic
- Reproducibility1▲ 104×1 topic
- Scientific Workflows1▲ 104×1 topic
- Visual Perception1▲ 171×1 topic
- Artificial Intelligence1▲ 2.2×2 topics
- Decision Making1▲ 11×1 topic
- Human-Robot Interaction1▲ 26×2 topics
- Log Analysis1▲ 71×1 topic
- Performance Prediction1▲ 44×1 topic
- Risk Aversion1▲ 168×1 topic
Which research topics does OpenBiome publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Security and Verification in Computing, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety and Access Control and Trust.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 4 works
- 2 Security and Verification in Computing Artificial Intelligence 3 works
- 3 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 3 works
- 4 Access Control and Trust Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 5 Personal Information Management and User Behavior Information Systems and Management 2 works
- 6 Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence 2 works
- 7 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
- 8 Embodied and Extended Cognition Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
- 9 Visual perception and processing mechanisms Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
- 10 Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life Astronomy and Astrophysics 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has OpenBiome's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 83% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is OpenBiome as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000020% in 2024.
Fractional works of OpenBiome over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Somerville
- Science Research Laboratory
- Tracer Technologies (United States)
- MagiQ Technologies (United States)
- Political Research Associates
- Whalen Biomedical
- Boston Cancer Policy Institute
- Finch Therapeutics (United States)
- TissueVision (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about OpenBiome. Posts are plain text and can be reported.