Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Plano · United States

Research Advocacy Network

Research works
22
▲ 63% vs 2018-21
Citations
418
19.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
17.7%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
39%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Research Advocacy Network is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Research Advocacy Network work in?

In all years, 52% of research at Research Advocacy Network is in Health Sciences, 26% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (46%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (22%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (9%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 11 fractional works · 52.0% of its workMedicine: 10 fractional works · 46.1% of its workOncology: 6 fractional works · 25.8% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workLife Sciences: 6 fractional works · 26.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5 fractional works · 21.6% of its workCancer Research: 3 fractional works · 11.7% of its workGenetics: 2 fractional works · 9.1% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 16.4% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 9.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 9.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workStatistics and Probability: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKResearch AdvocacyNetwork22fractional works, all years
Life Sciences26%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences52%Social Sciences16%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1046.1%
    2. Health Professions15.9%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology521.6%
    2. Neuroscience13.6%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.5%
    4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance29.0%
    2. Social Sciences15.4%
    3. Psychology01.6%
    4. Decision Sciences00.5%
    1. Mathematics13.9%
    2. Computer Science00.8%
    3. Engineering00.5%
    4. Environmental Science00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5.66× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.19× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.05× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Environmental Science: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.83× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.55× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.15× its world share, 3 worksMedicineDecision Sciences: 1.12× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.13× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.95× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology5.66×2 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.13×1 works
  3. Medicine2.15×3 works
  4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.05×0 works
  5. Mathematics1.83×0 works
  6. Neuroscience1.19×0 works
  7. Decision Sciences1.12×0 works
  8. Psychology0.95×0 works
  9. Social Sciences0.59×1 works
  10. Health Professions0.55×0 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.23×0 works
  12. Environmental Science0.15×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Research Advocacy Network?

Ranked on the quality score, Carol White and Elda Railey lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Research Advocacy Network.

  1. 1 Carol White United States · #1,784,569 worldwide 1.2k citations · 69 works
  2. 2 Elda Railey United States · #2,564,709 worldwide 321 citations · 44 works
All ranked researchers at Research Advocacy Network

What are the most cited papers from Research Advocacy Network?

The most cited paper from Research Advocacy Network is "Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology" (William John Gradishar et al., 2020), with 1,628 citations. Next come "Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Survivors of Adult Cancers: ASCO Guideline Update" (1,132) and "Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology" (981).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology William John Gradishar et al. · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Apr 2020 1,628
2 Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Survivors of Adult Cancers: ASCO Guideline Update Charles L. Loprinzi, Christina Lacchetti, Jonathan Scott Bleeker et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology Open access 14 Jul 2020 1,132
3 Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology William John Gradishar et al. · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Jun 2022 981
4 Breast Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology William John Gradishar et al. · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Jul 2024 653
5 NCCN Guidelines Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 1.2017 William John Gradishar et al. · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Open access Apr 2017 545
All 77 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Research Advocacy Network?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Taxanes, Precision Medicine, Molecular Subtypes and BRCA1.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 30 words, with their numbers
  1. Quality of Life4▲ 14×4 topics
  2. Breast Cancer3▲ 57×7 topics
  3. Metastatic Breast Cancer3▲ 226×2 topics
  4. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy2▲ 205×1 topic
  5. Taxanes2▲ 205×1 topic
  6. Precision Medicine2▲ 30×4 topics
  7. Molecular Subtypes2▲ 99×2 topics
  8. BRCA12▲ 322×1 topic
  9. BRCA22▲ 322×1 topic
  10. Gene Expression2▲ 14×2 topics
  11. Neoadjuvant Therapy2▲ 36×2 topics
  12. Radiotherapy2▲ 22×3 topics
  13. Breast Tumours2▲ 163×1 topic
  14. Treatment Response2▲ 163×1 topic
  15. Clinical Trials2▲ 11×5 topics
  16. Health-related Quality of Life1▲ 27×2 topics
  17. Cancer Incidence1▲ 37×2 topics
  18. Cancer Survivorship1▲ 91×2 topics
  19. Cost of Care1▲ 288×1 topic
  20. Depression1▲ 7.2×3 topics
  21. Financial Toxicity1▲ 288×1 topic
  22. Health Disparities1▲ 28×3 topics
  23. Population-Based Study1▲ 88×2 topics
  24. Anxiety1▲ 14×1 topic
  25. Global Surveillance1▲ 128×1 topic
  26. Mortality Rates1▲ 53×1 topic
  27. Patient-Reported Outcomes1▲ 135×1 topic
  28. Evidence-Based Practice1▲ 27×1 topic
  29. Healthcare Professionals1▲ 173×1 topic
  30. Medical Education1▲ 20×2 topics

Which research topics does Research Advocacy Network publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Cancer survivorship and care and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer.

  1. 1 BRCA gene mutations in cancer Genetics 1 works
  2. 2 Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Oncology 1 works
  3. 3 Cancer survivorship and care Oncology 1 works
  4. 4 Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer Economics and Econometrics 1 works
  5. 5 Breast Cancer Treatment Studies Cancer Research 1 works
  6. 6 Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  7. 7 Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Cancer Research 0 works
  8. 8 Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  9. 9 Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology Oncology 0 works
  10. 10 Cancer Risks and Factors Oncology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available38.8%not open61.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.7%domestic only83.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Research Advocacy Network's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 63% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Research Advocacy Network as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000039% in 2024.

still counting0.000020%0.000040%0.000060%Research Advocacy Network0.000016% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Research Advocacy Network over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Plano

All research institutions in Plano

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Research Advocacy Network. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.