Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Washington · United States

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

sparcopen.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
19
▼ 80% vs 2018-21
Citations
179
9.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
59%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

Not ranked overall: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition work in?

In all years, 44% of research at Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition is in Physical Sciences, 43% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (44%), Decision Sciences (25%), Arts and Humanities (11%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 44.0% of its workComputer Science: 8 fractional works · 44.0% of its workInformation Systems: 7 fractional works · 36.5% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 43.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 5 fractional works · 25.0% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 3 fractional works · 18.8% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 6.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 10.8% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 2 fractional works · 8.7% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 7.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 10.9% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 7.8% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 5.6% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workALL ITS WORKScholarlyPublishing and…19fractional works, all years
Life Sciences2%Physical Sciences44%Health Sciences11%Social Sciences43%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science844.0%
    1. Decision Sciences525.0%
    2. Arts and Humanities210.8%
    3. Social Sciences17.4%
    1. Medicine17.8%
    2. Health Professions13.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.2%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.6%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition?

Ranked on the quality score, Raym Crow, Alison Buckholtz and Heather Dalterio Joseph lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.

  1. 1 Raym Crow United States · #2,160,533 worldwide 868 citations · 28 works
  2. 2 Alison Buckholtz United States · #4,840,524 worldwide 36 citations · 24 works
  3. 3 Heather Dalterio Joseph United States · #5,186,740 worldwide 389 citations · 71 works
  4. 4 Nicole Starr Allen United States · #5,966,092 worldwide 167 citations · 67 works
All ranked researchers at Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

What are the most cited papers from Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition?

The most cited paper from Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition is "SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition" (written. Alison BUCKHOLTZ, transl. Kazuko TAKAGI, 2002), with 46 citations. Next come "The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution" (42) and "Female Gender and Diabetes Mellitus Increase the Risk of Recurrence after Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair" (30).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 SPARC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition written. Alison BUCKHOLTZ, transl. Kazuko TAKAGI · Journal of Information Processing and Management Open access 2002 46
2 The Open Access Movement Grows Up: Taking Stock of a Revolution Heather Dalterio Joseph · PLoS Biology Open access 22 Oct 2013 42
3 Female Gender and Diabetes Mellitus Increase the Risk of Recurrence after Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair ST Hornby, Frank D. McDermott, Mark Coleman et al. · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England Open access 26 Feb 2015 30
4 Policy and Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery in the Beginning of the 21st Century Vural Özdemir, Charles Vincent Smith, Kathleen D. Bongiovanni et al. · OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology Apr 2011 29
5 Open Access Richard K. Johnson · Journal of Library Administration 5 Apr 2005 27
All 35 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Online Learning and Analytics, E-Learning and Knowledge Management and Open Education and E-Learning.

Blockchain Technology Ap…0Blockchain Technology Applications and Security: 0 fractional worksOnline Learning and Analytics: 0 fractional worksE-Learning and Knowledge Management: 0 fractional worksOpen Education and E-Learning: 0 fractional works
Information SystemsComputer Science Applications

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Blockchain Technology Applications and Security Information Systems 0 works
  2. 2 Online Learning and Analytics Computer Science Applications 0 works
  3. 3 E-Learning and Knowledge Management Computer Science Applications 0 works
  4. 4 Open Education and E-Learning Computer Science Applications 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available59.1%not open40.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors17.2%domestic only82.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 80% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000049% in 2021.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition0.0000085% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Washington

All research institutions in Washington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Posts are plain text and can be reported.