Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Coimbra · Portugal

Take The Wind (Portugal)

Research works
19
▲ 138% vs 2018-21
Citations
291
15.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
43%
world 40%
International
63%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Take The Wind (Portugal) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Take The Wind (Portugal) work in?

In all years, 41% of research at Take The Wind (Portugal) is in Health Sciences, 33% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (35%), Engineering (16%), Arts and Humanities (7%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 8 fractional works · 41.1% of its workMedicine: 7 fractional works · 35.1% of its workSurgery: 2 fractional works · 10.0% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 32.7% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 16.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workFluid Flow and Transfer Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 19.7% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 6.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSensory Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKTake The Wind(Portugal)19fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences33%Health Sciences41%Social Sciences20%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine735.1%
    2. Health Professions16.0%
    1. Engineering316.3%
    2. Materials Science14.6%
    3. Computer Science12.8%
    4. Energy02.7%
    5. Environmental Science02.7%
    6. Chemistry01.8%
    7. Chemical Engineering00.9%
    8. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.9%
    1. Arts and Humanities16.9%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting15.4%
    3. Social Sciences13.9%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance02.7%
    5. Psychology00.9%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology13.3%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.8%
    3. Neuroscience01.0%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Chemical Engineering: 8.41× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringEngineering: 1.37× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.18× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 5.58× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.84× its world share, 2 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.12× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 0.93× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemical Engineering, 8.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Chemical Engineering8.41×0 works
  2. Health Professions5.58×1 works
  3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance4.12×0 works
  4. Medicine1.84×2 works
  5. Engineering1.37×1 works
  6. Environmental Science1.18×0 works
  7. Social Sciences0.93×1 works

What are the most cited papers from Take The Wind (Portugal)?

The most cited paper from Take The Wind (Portugal) is "Biomarkers of folate status in NHANES: a roundtable summary" (Elizabeth Ann D. Yetley et al., 2011), with 136 citations. Next come "Fall Characterictics, Functional Mobility and Bone Mineral Density as Risk Factors of Hip Fracture in the Community-Dwelling Ambulatory Elderly" (113) and "Partner notification by HIV-1 seropositive pregnant women: association with infant feeding decisions" (53).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Biomarkers of folate status in NHANES: a roundtable summary Elizabeth Ann D. Yetley et al. · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Open access 19 May 2011 136
2 Fall Characterictics, Functional Mobility and Bone Mineral Density as Risk Factors of Hip Fracture in the Community-Dwelling Ambulatory Elderly Ta‐Sen Wei, Chengzhang Hu, S. H. Wang · Osteoporosis International Dec 2001 113
3 Partner notification by HIV-1 seropositive pregnant women: association with infant feeding decisions Carey Farquhar, Dorothy Mbori‐Ngacha, Rose Kerubo Bosire et al. · AIDS Open access Apr 2001 53
4 Shared Decision Making and Autonomy Among US Participants with Multiple Sclerosis in the NARCOMS Registry Stacey S. Cofield, Nina Thomas, Tuula M. Tyry et al. · International Journal of MS Care Open access 28 Jun 2017 42
5 EFFECTS OF GREENHOUSE CO2 ENRICHMENT ON THE YIELD AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHYSIOLOGY OF TOMATO PLANTS Peter R. Hicklenton, Peter A. Jolliffe · Canadian Journal of Plant Science Open access Jul 1978 42
All 20 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Take The Wind (Portugal) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Quality and Safety in Healthcare, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Coronary Artery Anomalies and Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications.

  1. 1 Quality and Safety in Healthcare Medical Laboratory Technology 0 works
  2. 2 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  3. 3 Coronary Artery Anomalies Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  4. 4 Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications Surgery 0 works
  5. 5 Military Technology and Strategies Aerospace Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  7. 7 Chronic Disease Management Strategies Epidemiology 0 works
  8. 8 Legal and Regulatory Analysis Transportation 0 works
  9. 9 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 0 works
  10. 10 Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available43.0%not open57.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors63.4%domestic only36.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Take The Wind (Portugal)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 138% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Take The Wind (Portugal) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000036% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Take The Wind (Portugal)0.000031% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Take The Wind (Portugal) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Coimbra

All research institutions in Coimbra

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Take The Wind (Portugal). Posts are plain text and can be reported.