Wikimedia Nederland
In research, Wikimedia Nederland stands highest in Health Sciences (#6,268 of 11,982 worldwide), Health Professions (#1,113 of 1,928 worldwide) and Medicine (#9,704 of 10,443 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Medical Terminology, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology — Medical Terminology is 1730.6× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #19,117 of 28,054 · #27,954 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #178 of 237
- Research works
- 1.2k ▼ 45% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 600 0.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 3% world 28%
What is Wikimedia Nederland known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #6,268 of 11,982 | 0.3% | 184 | #11156 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #1,113 of 1,928 | 0.1% | 60 | #2369 | |
| MedicineField | #9,704 of 10,443 | 0.4% | 123 | #16255 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #10,226 of 10,521 | 1.1% | 192 | #12865 | |
| Social SciencesField | #6,347 of 6,365 | 0.4% | 102 | #10083 | |
| EducationSubfield | #1,891 of 1,892 | 0.1% | 67 | #3032 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Wikimedia Nederland sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Health Sciences#11,156 #6,268
- Health Professions#2,369 #1,113
- Medicine#16,255 #9,704
- Social Sciences#12,865 #10,226
- Social Sciences#10,083 #6,347
- Education#3,032 #1,891
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Wikimedia Nederland specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Medical Terminology takes 1730.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Medical TerminologySubfield · 21.9 works1731×
- PhilosophySubfield · 22.1 works12×
- Clinical PsychologySubfield · 26.9 works6.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 5.4×
- Energy 3.2×
- Psychology 2.8×
- Arts and Humanities 2.4×
- Social Sciences 1.9×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.8×
- Medicine 1.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.9×
- Neuroscience 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.5×
- Nursing 0.5×
- Decision Sciences 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Wikimedia Nederland?
Ranked on the composite score, Nico Kaptein, Chandra Ghosh Ippen and Ingrid Janssen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Wikimedia Nederland.
- 1 Nico Kaptein · #1,128,545 worldwide 34 citations · 20 works
- 2 Chandra Ghosh Ippen · #1,287,399 worldwide 23 citations · 15 works
- 3 Ingrid Janssen · #1,344,502 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
- 4 Patricia Van Horn · #1,379,883 worldwide 8 citations · 15 works
- 5 Margreet van Putten · #1,484,193 worldwide 0 citations · 30 works
- 6 Marissa Scherptong-Engbers · #1,609,006 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Wikimedia Nederland?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Health Promotion, Professionalism, Cultural Diversity, Empowerment, Social Work, Research Methods and Teacher Development.
- Injury Prevention
- Guideline Development
- Digital Technology
- Cultural Analysis
- Quality Assessment
- Clinical Guidelines
- Energy Consumption
- Risk Factors
- Health Checks
- Globalization
- Self-Experience
- Phenomenology
- Health Information Management
- Ethical Implications
- Psychiatric Disorders
- Healthcare
- Teacher Development
- Social Work
- Cultural Diversity
- Health Promotion
- Education
- Professionalism
- Empowerment
- Research Methods
- Mental Health
- Epidemiology
- Neuroscience
- Client
- Patient
- DSM
- Public Health
- Chronic Disease Prevention
- Preventive Services
- Agricultural Practices
- Primary Care
- Prevention
- Rehabilitation
- COVID-19 Impact
- Economic Policy
- Practice Recommendations
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education67▲ 9.2×15 topics
- Health Promotion64▲ 48×4 topics
- Professionalism62▲ 86×3 topics
- Cultural Diversity61▲ 64×4 topics
- Empowerment60▲ 151×2 topics
- Social Work60▲ 202×2 topics
- Research Methods60▲ 86×1 topic
- Teacher Development60▲ 228×1 topic
- Mental Health32▲ 5.2×13 topics
- Healthcare28▲ 5.8×10 topics
- Epidemiology28▲ 1.65×32 topics
- Psychiatric Disorders24▲ 44×3 topics
- Neuroscience22▲ 18×4 topics
- Ethical Implications22▲ 113×3 topics
- Client22▲ 1726×1 topic
- Health Information Management22▲ 469×2 topics
- Patient22▲ 1726×1 topic
- Phenomenology21▲ 48×2 topics
- DSM20▲ 205×1 topic
- Self-Experience20▲ 205×1 topic
- Public Health18▲ 3.0×14 topics
- Globalization18▲ 2.1×9 topics
- Chronic Disease Prevention15▲ 238×2 topics
- Health Checks14▲ 259×1 topic
- Preventive Services14▲ 58×1 topic
- Risk Factors14▲ 3.0×12 topics
- Agricultural Practices12▲ 75×1 topic
- Energy Consumption12▲ 13×1 topic
- Primary Care11▲ 6.8×8 topics
- Clinical Guidelines10▲ 8.5×4 topics
- Prevention9▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Quality Assessment8▲ 11×2 topics
- Rehabilitation8▲ 5.1×7 topics
- Cultural Analysis8▲ 40×2 topics
- COVID-19 Impact8▲ 12×2 topics
- Digital Technology8▲ 19×1 topic
- Economic Policy8▲ 38×1 topic
- Guideline Development8▲ 94×1 topic
- Practice Recommendations8▲ 94×1 topic
- Injury Prevention8▲ 16×4 topics
Which research topics does Wikimedia Nederland publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Medical Research and Practices, Mental Health and Psychiatry and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 60 works
- 2 Medical Research and Practices Medical Terminology 22 works
- 3 Mental Health and Psychiatry Philosophy 20 works
- 4 Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 14 works
- 5 Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 12 works
- 6 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8 works
- 7 Economic Analysis and Policy Economics and Econometrics 8 works
- 8 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 7 works
- 9 Human auditory perception and evaluation Aerospace Engineering 7 works
- 10 Comparative and International Law Studies Law 6 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Wikimedia Nederland's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 45% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Utrecht
- Utrecht University
- University Medical Center Utrecht
- Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
- Huisarts en Wetenschap
- Wilhelmina Children's Hospital
- University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
- Geneeskundige en Gezondheidsdienst
- Oncode Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.