Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Utrecht · Netherlands

Wikimedia Nederland

In research, Wikimedia Nederland stands highest in Health Sciences (#6,268 of 11,982 worldwide), Health Professions (#1,113 of 1,928 worldwide) and Medicine (#9,704 of 10,443 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Medical Terminology, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology — Medical Terminology is 1730.6× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#19,117
of 28,054 · #27,954 all time
Rank in Netherlands
#178
of 237
Research works
1.2k
▼ 45% vs 2013–17
Citations
600
0.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
3%
world 28%

What is Wikimedia Nederland known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Health SciencesDomain #6,268 of 11,982 0.3%184 #11156
Health ProfessionsField #1,113 of 1,928 0.1%60 #2369
MedicineField #9,704 of 10,443 0.4%123 #16255
Social SciencesDomain #10,226 of 10,521 1.1%192 #12865
Social SciencesField #6,347 of 6,365 0.4%102 #10083
EducationSubfield #1,891 of 1,892 0.1%67 #3032

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Wikimedia Nederland sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Which of those standings moved

The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.

  1. Health Sciences#11,156 #6,268
  2. Health Professions#2,369 #1,113
  3. Medicine#16,255 #9,704
  4. Social Sciences#12,865 #10,226
  5. Social Sciences#10,083 #6,347
  6. Education#3,032 #1,891
all time2022–2025, better2022–2025, worse

A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.

What does Wikimedia Nederland specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Medical Terminology takes 1730.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Medical TerminologySubfield · 21.9 works1731×
  2. PhilosophySubfield · 22.1 works12×
  3. Clinical PsychologySubfield · 26.9 works6.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.06× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.24× its world share, 5 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.68× its world share, 5 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.16× its world share, 5 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 3.23× its world share, 12 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.15× its world share, 10 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.22× its world share, 5 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 5.43× its world share, 60 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.52× its world share, 123 worksMedicineNursing: 0.48× its world share, 1 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.40× its world share, 29 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.50× its world share, 7 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.33× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.79× its world share, 16 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.82× its world share, 36 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.92× its world share, 102 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Wikimedia Nederland?

Ranked on the composite score, Nico Kaptein, Chandra Ghosh Ippen and Ingrid Janssen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Wikimedia Nederland.

  1. 1 Nico Kaptein · #1,128,545 worldwide 34 citations · 20 works
  2. 2 Chandra Ghosh Ippen · #1,287,399 worldwide 23 citations · 15 works
  3. 3 Ingrid Janssen · #1,344,502 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
  4. 4 Patricia Van Horn · #1,379,883 worldwide 8 citations · 15 works
  5. 5 Margreet van Putten · #1,484,193 worldwide 0 citations · 30 works
  6. 6 Marissa Scherptong-Engbers · #1,609,006 worldwide 1 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Wikimedia Nederland

Which keywords describe research at Wikimedia Nederland?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Health Promotion, Professionalism, Cultural Diversity, Empowerment, Social Work, Research Methods and Teacher Development.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Education67▲ 9.2×15 topics
  2. Health Promotion64▲ 48×4 topics
  3. Professionalism62▲ 86×3 topics
  4. Cultural Diversity61▲ 64×4 topics
  5. Empowerment60▲ 151×2 topics
  6. Social Work60▲ 202×2 topics
  7. Research Methods60▲ 86×1 topic
  8. Teacher Development60▲ 228×1 topic
  9. Mental Health32▲ 5.2×13 topics
  10. Healthcare28▲ 5.8×10 topics
  11. Epidemiology28▲ 1.65×32 topics
  12. Psychiatric Disorders24▲ 44×3 topics
  13. Neuroscience22▲ 18×4 topics
  14. Ethical Implications22▲ 113×3 topics
  15. Client22▲ 1726×1 topic
  16. Health Information Management22▲ 469×2 topics
  17. Patient22▲ 1726×1 topic
  18. Phenomenology21▲ 48×2 topics
  19. DSM20▲ 205×1 topic
  20. Self-Experience20▲ 205×1 topic
  21. Public Health18▲ 3.0×14 topics
  22. Globalization18▲ 2.1×9 topics
  23. Chronic Disease Prevention15▲ 238×2 topics
  24. Health Checks14▲ 259×1 topic
  25. Preventive Services14▲ 58×1 topic
  26. Risk Factors14▲ 3.0×12 topics
  27. Agricultural Practices12▲ 75×1 topic
  28. Energy Consumption12▲ 13×1 topic
  29. Primary Care11▲ 6.8×8 topics
  30. Clinical Guidelines10▲ 8.5×4 topics
  31. Prevention9▲ 5.1×5 topics
  32. Quality Assessment8▲ 11×2 topics
  33. Rehabilitation8▲ 5.1×7 topics
  34. Cultural Analysis8▲ 40×2 topics
  35. COVID-19 Impact8▲ 12×2 topics
  36. Digital Technology8▲ 19×1 topic
  37. Economic Policy8▲ 38×1 topic
  38. Guideline Development8▲ 94×1 topic
  39. Practice Recommendations8▲ 94×1 topic
  40. Injury Prevention8▲ 16×4 topics

Which research topics does Wikimedia Nederland publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Medical Research and Practices, Mental Health and Psychiatry and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention.

  1. 1 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 60 works
  2. 2 Medical Research and Practices Medical Terminology 22 works
  3. 3 Mental Health and Psychiatry Philosophy 20 works
  4. 4 Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 14 works
  5. 5 Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 12 works
  6. 6 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8 works
  7. 7 Economic Analysis and Policy Economics and Econometrics 8 works
  8. 8 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 7 works
  9. 9 Human auditory perception and evaluation Aerospace Engineering 7 works
  10. 10 Comparative and International Law Studies Law 6 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available3.2%not open96.8%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors2.0%domestic only98.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Wikimedia Nederland's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 45% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Utrecht

All research institutions in Utrecht

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.