Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Archeology

Archaeological and Historical Studies

Archaeological and Historical Studies is a research topic within Archeology. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1950. 12.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to the archaeology of the Iberian Peninsula, including the Iron Age, Romanization, Celtic culture, Phoenician influence, numismatics, religious practices, settlement patterns, and cultural exchange. The papers explore the ancient history and material culture of the region, shedding light on its diverse and complex past.

  • Iberian Peninsula
  • archaeology
  • Iron Age
  • Romanization
  • Celtic culture
  • Phoenician influence
  • numismatics
  • religious practices
  • settlement patterns
  • cultural exchange
Research works
17k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+10%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Archaeological and Historical Studies research?

By volume, Spain and France publish the most (1.3k and 239 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Spain 1.3k works
  2. 2 France 239 works
  3. 3 Italy 124 works
  4. 4 Mexico 117 works
  5. 5 Argentina 109 works
  6. 6 Brazil 107 works
  7. 7 United States 107 works
  8. 8 Portugal 96 works
  9. 9 Chile 52 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 43 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Spain: 57.0%France: 10.3%Italy: 5.4%Mexico: 5.1%6 others listed: 22.2%57%largest
Spain1,318 · 57.0%France239 · 10.3%Italy124 · 5.4%Mexico117 · 5.1%6 others listed514 · 22.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Archaeological and Historical Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad Complutense de Madrid publishes the most Archaeological and Historical Studies research, followed by Universidad de Granada and Universitat de Barcelona.

Who are the leading researchers in Archaeological and Historical Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Archaeological and Historical Studies include Rafael Lozano and Hai Cheng.

  1. 1 Rafael Lozano United States 5.5k citations
  2. 2 Hai Cheng China 2.9k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Archaeological and Historical Studies research done?

The largest centres of Archaeological and Historical Studies research in 2022–2025 are Madrid (Spain), Barcelona (Spain), Granada (Spain) and Seville (Spain). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Pessac, Tarragona and Cadiz.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Madrid Spain 326 works
  2. 2 Barcelona Spain 93 works
  3. 3 Granada Spain 90 works
  4. 4 Seville Spain 83 works
  5. 5 Valencia Spain 64 works
  6. 6 Zaragoza Spain 57 works
  7. 7 Buenos Aires Argentina 54 works
  8. 8 Lisbon Portugal 51 works
  9. 9 Pessac France 45 works
  10. 10 Mexico City Mexico 43 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PessacFR · 44.8 works109×
  2. TarragonaES · 27.9 works55×
  3. CadizES · 27.2 works51×
  4. GranadaES · 90.1 works48×
  5. Santiago de CompostelaES · 40.3 works39×
  6. ZaragozaES · 56.8 works39×
  7. AlicanteES · 31.2 works39×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Archaeological and Historical Studies than the world average.

See Archaeological and Historical Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Archaeological and Historical Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Institut Català d'Arqueologia Clàssica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela and Universidad de Granada score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 18.17%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Institut Català d'Arqueologia Clàssica: 17, 41.6%Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: 30, 19.4%Universidad de Granada: 82, 10.6%University of Lisbon: 14, 16.7%Real Academia Española: 9, 25.3%Universitat de Barcelona: 59, 11.1%Universidad de Cádiz: 27, 19.2%University of the Basque Country: 41, 9.4%University of Alicante: 30, 19.1%Universidad Complutense de Madrid: 94, 9.3%Institut Català d'Ar…Universidade de Sant…University of LisbonUniversidad de Granada
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Institut Català d'Arqueologia ClàssicaSpain 70.941.6%1614.9×17 +51.1%
2 Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaSpain 65.319.4%40.7×30 +153.0%
3 Universidad de GranadaSpain 59.410.6%59.9×82 +23.7%
4 University of LisbonPortugal 59.416.7%9.0×14 +206.1%
5 Real Academia EspañolaSpain 59.425.3%108.0×9 +315.3%
6 Universitat de BarcelonaSpain 58.811.1%41.8×59 +34.6%
7 Universidad de CádizSpain 58.819.2%61.7×27 +75.8%
8 University of the Basque CountrySpain 57.89.4%36.4×41 +122.5%
9 University of AlicanteSpain 57.619.1%44.0×30 +54.1%
10 Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain 56.99.3%48.8×94 +14.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Archaeological and Historical Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 10% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Archaeological and Historical Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.