Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Archeology

Archaeological and Geological Studies

Archaeological and Geological Studies is a research topic within Archeology. Science Explorer counts 10k research works in it since 1950. 21.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to the Neolithic and Bronze Age archaeology in the Iberian Peninsula. It includes studies on Neolithic farming, cultural processes, megalithic sites, burial practices, settlement patterns, and technological analysis of artifacts.

  • Neolithic
  • Bronze Age
  • Iberian Peninsula
  • Archaeology
  • Artifacts
  • Cultural Processes
  • Megalithic Sites
  • Prehistoric Communities
  • Ritual Practices
  • Settlement Patterns
Research works
10k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
21.6%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+12%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Archaeological and Geological Studies research?

By volume, Spain and France publish the most (528 and 387 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Spain 528 works
  2. 2 France 387 works
  3. 3 Argentina 143 works
  4. 4 Brazil 70 works
  5. 5 United States 69 works
  6. 6 Portugal 65 works
  7. 7 Mexico 57 works
  8. 8 Peru 44 works
  9. 9 United Kingdom 42 works
  10. 10 Italy 36 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Spain: 36.7%France: 26.9%Argentina: 9.9%Brazil: 4.9%6 others listed: 21.7%37%largest
Spain528 · 36.7%France387 · 26.9%Argentina143 · 9.9%Brazil70 · 4.9%6 others listed312 · 21.7%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Archaeological and Geological Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Ausonius Institut de Recherche sur l'Antiquité et le Moyen age publishes the most Archaeological and Geological Studies research, followed by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Who are the leading researchers in Archaeological and Geological Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Archaeological and Geological Studies include Hai Cheng, R. Lawrence Edwards and Sahra Talamo.

  1. 1 Hai Cheng China 2.9k citations
  2. 2 R. Lawrence Edwards United States 2k citations
  3. 3 Sahra Talamo Germany 1.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Archaeological and Geological Studies research done?

The largest centres of Archaeological and Geological Studies research in 2022–2025 are Madrid (Spain), Pessac (France), Buenos Aires (Argentina) and Paris (France). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Pessac, Metz and Nanterre.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Madrid Spain 130 works
  2. 2 Pessac France 110 works
  3. 3 Buenos Aires Argentina 64 works
  4. 4 Paris France 61 works
  5. 5 Toulouse France 44 works
  6. 6 Barcelona Spain 38 works
  7. 7 Lisbon Portugal 33 works
  8. 8 Granada Spain 33 works
  9. 9 Mexico City Mexico 26 works
  10. 10 Zaragoza Spain 26 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. PessacFR · 110.4 works432×
  2. MetzFR · 22.6 works208×
  3. NanterreFR · 22.2 works46×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Archaeological and Geological Studies than the world average.

See Archaeological and Geological Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Archaeological and Geological Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Lisbon, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 24.49%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Lisbon: 10, 23.4%Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: 11, 24.8%Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: 16, 31.9%Universidad Complutense de Madrid: 33, 25.2%Universidad de Sevilla: 13, 28.2%Universidad Nacional de La Plata: 14, 27.5%Universitat de Barcelona: 19, 22.2%Universidad de Granada: 30, 20.0%University of Alicante: 13, 25.2%Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: 17, 16.5%Universitat Autònoma…Universidad Complute…Universidade de Sant…University of Lisbon
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of LisbonPortugal 69.623.4%10.1×10 +160.5%
2 Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaSpain 67.824.8%23.2×11 +139.8%
3 Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSpain 66.931.9%23.4×16 -26.9%
4 Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain 66.125.2%27.4×33 +14.0%
5 Universidad de SevillaSpain 65.628.2%15.0×13 +54.9%
6 Universidad Nacional de La PlataArgentina 65.527.5%46.6×14 +57.5%
7 Universitat de BarcelonaSpain 65.122.2%21.9×19 +55.9%
8 Universidad de GranadaSpain 61.820.0%35.2×30 +4.2%
9 University of AlicanteSpain 61.425.2%31.8×13 +38.8%
10 Universidad Autónoma de MadridSpain 58.416.5%27.8×17 +61.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Archaeological and Geological Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 12% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Archaeological and Geological Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.