Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Topic · Archeology

Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies is a research topic within Archeology. Science Explorer counts 18k research works in it since 1950. 10.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores various aspects of ancient magical practices and beliefs, including Gnosticism, Hermeticism, alchemy, astrology, Manichaeism, rituals, divination, cultural transmission, and religious syncretism.

  • Ancient Magic
  • Gnosticism
  • Hermeticism
  • Alchemy
  • Astrology
  • Manichaeism
  • Rituals
  • Divination
  • Cultural Transmission
  • Religious Syncretism
Research works
18k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
10.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
-3%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
United States
26% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Which countries lead Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research?

By volume, the United States and France publish the most (670 and 454 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 United States 670 works
  2. 2 France 454 works
  3. 3 Italy 315 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 304 works
  5. 5 Germany 252 works
  6. 6 Spain 164 works
  7. 7 Russia 122 works
  8. 8 Poland 106 works
  9. 9 Canada 78 works
  10. 10 Israel 70 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 26.4%France: 17.9%Italy: 12.4%United Kingdom: 12.0%6 others listed: 31.3%26%largest
United States670 · 26.4%France454 · 17.9%Italy315 · 12.4%United Kingdom304 · 12.0%6 others listed792 · 31.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research?

By volume in 2022-now, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique publishes the most Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research, followed by University of Oxford and Ca' Foscari University of Venice.

Who are the leading researchers in Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies include George Davey Smith and Michel Foucault.

  1. 1 George Davey Smith United Kingdom 435k citations
  2. 2 Michel Foucault France 208k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies?

The most cited paper in Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies is "Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments" (Kathleen M. Coleman, 1990), with 721 citations. Next come "Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival" (556) and "Tombstones and Roman Family Relations in the Principate: Civilians, Soldiers and Slaves" (484).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments Kathleen M. Coleman · The Journal of Roman Studies Nov 1990 721
2 Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival E. L. Bowie · The Journal of Hellenic Studies Nov 1986 556
3 Tombstones and Roman Family Relations in the Principate: Civilians, Soldiers and Slaves Richard Saller, Brent Donald Shaw · The Journal of Roman Studies Nov 1984 484
4 What Do Objects Want? Chris Gosden · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 30 Aug 2005 431
5 Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine Herbert A. Deane, R. A. Markus · The American Historical Review Oct 1971 397
All 100 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research done?

The largest centres of Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research in 2022-now are Paris (France), Rome (Italy), Moscow (Russia) and Madrid (Spain). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Venice, Nanterre and Lyon.

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 ParisFrance 155 works
  2. 2 RomeItaly 61 works
  3. 3 MoscowRussia 55 works
  4. 4 MadridSpain 55 works
  5. 5 OxfordUnited Kingdom 49 works
  6. 6 LondonUnited Kingdom 46 works
  7. 7 LyonFrance 44 works
  8. 8 VeniceItaly 44 works
  9. 9 New YorkUnited States 37 works
  10. 10 ViennaAustria 36 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. VeniceIT · 44.3 works39×
  2. NanterreFR · 26.4 works26×
  3. LyonFR · 44.4 works14×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies than the world average.

See Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Oxford, University of Cambridge and Ca' Foscari University of Venice score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 12.94%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →University of OxfordUniversity of Edinbu…University of Cambri…Ca' Foscari Universi…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 93.715.5%10.1×45 +17.7%
2University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 79.912.8%8.4×31 -7.7%
3Ca' Foscari University of VeniceItaly 72.89.8%58.6×44 +129.0%
4University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 68.415.5%7.3×20 -5.7%
5University of AmsterdamNetherlands 68.412.8%5.6×10 +38.8%
6University of ViennaAustria 66.711.6%12.8×20 +62.2%
7University of WürzburgGermany 65.417.9%9.8×10 +7.3%
8Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenGermany 64.611.9%6.4×18 +30.9%
9National and Kapodistrian University of AthensGreece 64.612.6%9.4×15 +75.4%
10Sapienza University of RomeItaly 63.79.0%7.4×27 +43.8%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies, country by country

Is Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 3% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2021.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.015% in 2024.

still counting0.020%0.040%Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies0.014% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies9.6% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies. Posts are plain text and can be reported.