Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Cryptographic Implementations and Security

Cryptographic Implementations and Security is a research topic within Artificial Intelligence. Science Explorer counts 21k research works in it since 1951. 22.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the cryptanalysis of block ciphers and hash functions, including topics such as side-channel attacks, differential cryptanalysis, security analysis of hardware implementations, lightweight ciphers, fault attacks, and authenticated encryption.

  • Cryptanalysis
  • Block Ciphers
  • Hash Functions
  • Side-Channel Attacks
  • Differential Cryptanalysis
  • Security Analysis
  • Hardware Implementations
  • Lightweight Ciphers
  • Fault Attacks
  • Authenticated Encryption
Research works
21k
fractional, since 1951
In the world top 10%
4.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
22.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+19%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Cryptographic Implementations and Security research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (943 and 705 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 943 works
  2. 2 India 705 works
  3. 3 United States 577 works
  4. 4 France 199 works
  5. 5 Japan 189 works
  6. 6 Germany 181 works
  7. 7 South Korea 117 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 95 works
  9. 9 Iraq 73 works
  10. 10 Italy 72 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 29.9%India: 22.4%United States: 18.3%France: 6.3%6 others listed: 23.1%30%largest
China943 · 29.9%India705 · 22.4%United States577 · 18.3%France199 · 6.3%6 others listed728 · 23.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Cryptographic Implementations and Security research?

By volume in 2022–2025, PLA Information Engineering University publishes the most Cryptographic Implementations and Security research, followed by KU Leuven and State Key Laboratory of Cryptology.

Who are the leading researchers in Cryptographic Implementations and Security?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Cryptographic Implementations and Security include Dan Boneh, Ronald L. Rivest and Adi Shamir.

  1. 1 Dan Boneh United States 7.5k citations
  2. 2 Ronald L. Rivest United States 7.3k citations
  3. 3 Adi Shamir Israel 6.3k citations
  4. 4 Kim‐Kwang Raymond Choo United States 3.8k citations
  5. 5 Yang Liu Singapore 3.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Cryptographic Implementations and Security research done?

The largest centres of Cryptographic Implementations and Security research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), Seoul (South Korea) and Chennai (India). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Luxembourg, Bochum and Palaiseau.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 269 works
  2. 2 Tokyo Japan 75 works
  3. 3 Seoul South Korea 66 works
  4. 4 Chennai India 61 works
  5. 5 Paris France 57 works
  6. 6 Shanghai China 57 works
  7. 7 Zhengzhou China 52 works
  8. 8 Leuven Belgium 51 works
  9. 9 Xi'an China 45 works
  10. 10 Nanjing China 44 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. LuxembourgLU · 20.2 works16×
  2. BochumDE · 32.7 works14×
  3. PalaiseauFR · 23.4 works12×
  4. KharagpurIN · 23.9 works11×
  5. LeuvenBE · 51.0 works11×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Cryptographic Implementations and Security than the world average.

See Cryptographic Implementations and Security on the map

Where is the best place to study Cryptographic Implementations and Security?

Among universities, judged by research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nanyang Technological University and Ruhr University Bochum score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 21.54%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Radboud University Nijmegen: 23, 28.3%Nanyang Technological University: 26, 26.5%Ruhr University Bochum: 27, 29.7%KU Leuven: 43, 17.3%Graz University of Technology: 14, 31.9%University of Luxembourg: 20, 17.7%Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham: 27, 7.7%UCLouvain: 12, 24.7%University of Electro-Communications: 20, 16.9%Hengyang Normal University: 12, 14.7%Ruhr University BochumRadboud University N…Nanyang Technologica…KU Leuven
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Radboud University NijmegenNetherlands 69.528.3%12.8×23 +87.3%
2 Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore 64.326.5%7.3×26 +85.2%
3 Ruhr University BochumGermany 64.229.7%15.6×27 +6.0%
4 KU LeuvenBelgium 62.017.3%11.1×43 -43.0%
5 Graz University of TechnologyAustria 57.831.9%16.0×14 -24.9%
6 University of LuxembourgLuxembourg 55.717.7%19.8×20 +1.3%
7 Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamIndia 54.47.7%11.7×27 +116.6%
8 UCLouvainBelgium 53.324.7%11.0×12 -11.7%
9 University of Electro-CommunicationsJapan 52.216.9%38.5×20 +17.9%
10 Hengyang Normal UniversityChina 51.314.7%82.1×12 +150.0%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Cryptographic Implementations and Security research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 19% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Cryptographic Implementations and Security.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.