Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Digital Platforms and Economics

Digital Platforms and Economics is a research topic within Strategy and Management. Science Explorer counts 28k research works in it since 1950. 27.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the competition and dynamics within two-sided markets, with a particular emphasis on platform competition, network effects, ecosystem innovation, technology standards, and price discrimination. The research explores the impact of network externalities and digital business models on market strategies and innovation.

  • Two-Sided Markets
  • Platform Competition
  • Network Effects
  • Ecosystem Innovation
  • Market Dynamics
  • Technology Standards
  • Price Discrimination
  • Network Externalities
  • Digital Business Models
  • Innovation Strategies
Research works
28k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
27.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+29%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Digital Platforms and Economics research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (989 and 885 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 989 works
  2. 2 United States 885 works
  3. 3 Germany 478 works
  4. 4 India 363 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 265 works
  6. 6 Italy 178 works
  7. 7 France 175 works
  8. 8 Russia 151 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 139 works
  10. 10 Brazil 129 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 26.4%United States: 23.6%Germany: 12.7%India: 9.7%6 others listed: 27.6%26%largest
China989 · 26.4%United States885 · 23.6%Germany478 · 12.7%India363 · 9.7%6 others listed1,037 · 27.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Digital Platforms and Economics research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Science and Technology of China publishes the most Digital Platforms and Economics research, followed by Indian Institute of Management Bangalore and University of Toronto.

Who are the leading researchers in Digital Platforms and Economics?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Digital Platforms and Economics include Jean Tirole and Fei–Yue Wang.

  1. 1 Jean Tirole France 4.4k citations
  2. 2 Fei–Yue Wang China 4.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Digital Platforms and Economics research done?

The largest centres of Digital Platforms and Economics research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Moscow (Russia) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Essen.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 164 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 96 works
  3. 3 Moscow Russia 84 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 80 works
  5. 5 Nanjing China 74 works
  6. 6 Guangzhou China 55 works
  7. 7 New York United States 52 works
  8. 8 Hong Kong China 51 works
  9. 9 Bengaluru India 49 works
  10. 10 Wuhan China 49 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. EssenDE · 22.1 works7.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Digital Platforms and Economics than the world average.

See Digital Platforms and Economics on the map

Where is the best place to study Digital Platforms and Economics?

Among universities, judged by research, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Central University of Finance and Economics and Copenhagen Business School score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 33.69%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Zhongnan University of Economics and Law: 12, 40.6%Central University of Finance and Economics: 13, 34.6%Copenhagen Business School: 16, 29.9%University of St.Gallen: 15, 27.5%The University of Texas at Dallas: 11, 35.1%University of Science and Technology of China: 27, 34.7%Tilburg University: 14, 23.9%Toulouse School of Economics: 10, 26.4%South China University of Technology: 14, 39.3%Hong Kong Polytechnic University: 13, 44.9%Zhongnan University …Central University o…Copenhagen Business …University of St.Gal…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Zhongnan University of Economics and LawChina 68.140.6%21.7×12 +75.3%
2 Central University of Finance and EconomicsChina 64.934.6%20.1×13 +86.5%
3 Copenhagen Business SchoolDenmark 63.429.9%17.8×16 +26.9%
4 University of St.GallenSwitzerland 61.527.5%26.5×15 +13.8%
5 The University of Texas at DallasUnited States 58.935.1%10.1×11 +3.0%
6 University of Science and Technology of ChinaChina 58.534.7%4.1×27 +41.9%
7 Tilburg UniversityNetherlands 56.523.9%15.5×14 +6.4%
8 Toulouse School of EconomicsFrance 56.426.4%108.2×10 +26.2%
9 South China University of TechnologyChina 56.039.3%2.4×14 +183.6%
10 Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong 55.744.9%2.8×13 +5.5%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Digital Platforms and Economics research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 29% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Digital Platforms and Economics.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.