Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Public-Private Partnership Projects

Public-Private Partnership Projects is a research topic within Strategy and Management. Science Explorer counts 11k research works in it since 1955. 23.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the evaluation, risk assessment, critical success factors, and governance of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) and Private Finance Initiative (PFI) projects in infrastructure development. It covers topics such as risk allocation, financial viability, stakeholder management, and renegotiation of contracts.

  • Public-Private Partnerships
  • Risk Allocation
  • Infrastructure Projects
  • Critical Success Factors
  • PPP/PFI Projects
  • Government Ownership
  • Contractual Governance
  • Financial Viability
  • Renegotiation
  • Stakeholder Management
Research works
11k
fractional, since 1955
In the world top 10%
2.6k
per year above
Top-10% rate
23.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+42%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Public-Private Partnership Projects research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (274 and 261 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 274 works
  2. 2 United States 261 works
  3. 3 Kenya 156 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 146 works
  5. 5 Nigeria 130 works
  6. 6 India 127 works
  7. 7 South Africa 116 works
  8. 8 Indonesia 115 works
  9. 9 Australia 80 works
  10. 10 Brazil 67 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 18.6%United States: 17.7%Kenya: 10.6%United Kingdom: 9.9%6 others listed: 43.1%19%largest
China274 · 18.6%United States261 · 17.7%Kenya156 · 10.6%United Kingdom146 · 9.9%6 others listed634 · 43.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Public-Private Partnership Projects research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology publishes the most Public-Private Partnership Projects research, followed by Kenyatta University and University of Johannesburg.

Who are the leading researchers in Public-Private Partnership Projects?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Public-Private Partnership Projects include Peter Nijkamp, Peter E.D. Love and David A. Hensher.

  1. 1 Peter Nijkamp Netherlands 2k citations
  2. 2 Peter E.D. Love Australia 1.6k citations
  3. 3 David A. Hensher Australia 1.5k citations
  4. 4 Albert P.C. Chan Hong Kong 1.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Public-Private Partnership Projects research done?

The largest centres of Public-Private Partnership Projects research in 2022–2025 are Nairobi (Kenya), Beijing (China), London (United Kingdom) and Johannesburg (South Africa). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Nairobi and Kampala.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Nairobi Kenya 112 works
  2. 2 Beijing China 43 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 42 works
  4. 4 Johannesburg South Africa 31 works
  5. 5 Shanghai China 28 works
  6. 6 Moscow Russia 26 works
  7. 7 Kampala Uganda 24 works
  8. 8 Pretoria South Africa 24 works
  9. 9 Bandung Indonesia 23 works
  10. 10 Washington D.C. United States 22 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. NairobiKE · 111.8 works51×
  2. KampalaUG · 24.5 works22×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Public-Private Partnership Projects than the world average.

See Public-Private Partnership Projects on the map

Where is the best place to study Public-Private Partnership Projects?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Johannesburg, Western Sydney University and Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 17.76%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Johannesburg: 25, 27.7%Western Sydney University: 12, 39.4%Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology: 10, 39.3%Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology: 38, 0.9%University of Nairobi: 23, 2.0%University of South Africa: 10, 37.0%Makerere University: 9, 8.0%University of Zambia: 11, 9.0%Kenyatta University: 34, 1.0%University of KwaZulu-Natal: 9, 13.3%Western Sydney Unive…Kwame Nkrumah Univer…University of Johann…Jomo Kenyatta Univer…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of JohannesburgSouth Africa 78.527.7%15.6×25 +288.6%
2 Western Sydney UniversityAustralia 77.239.4%18.8×12 +266.4%
3 Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and TechnologyGhana 75.939.3%20.0×10 +208.3%
4 Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and TechnologyKenya 62.40.9%126.0×38 +719.4%
5 University of NairobiKenya 57.92.0%58.0×23 +196.0%
6 University of South AfricaSouth Africa 55.637.0%8.6×10 +70.2%
7 Makerere UniversityUganda 54.28.0%20.3×9 +206.3%
8 University of ZambiaZambia 51.09.0%30.5×11
9 Kenyatta UniversityKenya 50.91.0%94.7×34
10 University of KwaZulu-NatalSouth Africa 49.513.3%9.7×9 +144.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Public-Private Partnership Projects research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 42% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Public-Private Partnership Projects.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.