Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Music

Diverse Musicological Studies

Diverse Musicological Studies is a research topic within Music. Science Explorer counts 22k research works in it since 1950. 13.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the intersection of music, culture, and environmental sustainability, with a focus on ecomusicology, ethnomusicology, and applied ethnomusicology. It delves into topics such as indigenous knowledge, data citation, digital resources, music's role in peacebuilding, and the conservation of cultural heritage. The papers also address issues of social justice and community empowerment through music.

  • Ecomusicology
  • Ethnomusicology
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Cultural Conservation
  • Music and Peacebuilding
  • Indigenous Knowledge
  • Digital Resource
  • Data Citation
  • Applied Ethnomusicology
  • Social Justice
Research works
22k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
13.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+46%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Diverse Musicological Studies research?

By volume, the United States and Türkiye publish the most (824 and 426 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 824 works
  2. 2 Türkiye 426 works
  3. 3 China 404 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 329 works
  5. 5 Russia 261 works
  6. 6 India 177 works
  7. 7 Germany 149 works
  8. 8 Australia 139 works
  9. 9 Canada 136 works
  10. 10 Brazil 126 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 27.7%Türkiye: 14.3%China: 13.6%United Kingdom: 11.1%6 others listed: 33.3%28%largest
United States824 · 27.7%Türkiye426 · 14.3%China404 · 13.6%United Kingdom329 · 11.1%6 others listed989 · 33.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Diverse Musicological Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Medical Library Association publishes the most Diverse Musicological Studies research, followed by Herzen University and Transylvania University of Brașov.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Medical Library AssociationUnited States 67 works
  2. 2 Herzen UniversityRussia 46 works
  3. 3 Transylvania University of BrașovRomania 28 works
  4. 4 University of LjubljanaSlovenia 25 works
  5. 5 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 24 works
  6. 6 Mahasarakham UniversityThailand 24 works
  7. 7 The University of MelbourneAustralia 21 works
  8. 8 Film IndependentUnited States 20 works
  9. 9 Gnessin Russian Academy of MusicRussia 20 works
  10. 10 University of Music and Performing Arts ViennaAustria 19 works

Where is Diverse Musicological Studies research done?

The largest centres of Diverse Musicological Studies research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Moscow (Russia), Chicago (United States) and Istanbul (Türkiye). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Maha Sarakham and Brasov.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 91 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 91 works
  3. 3 Chicago United States 82 works
  4. 4 Istanbul Türkiye 71 works
  5. 5 Ankara Türkiye 69 works
  6. 6 Saint Petersburg Russia 65 works
  7. 7 New York United States 57 works
  8. 8 Beijing China 52 works
  9. 9 Paris France 47 works
  10. 10 Ljubljana Slovenia 40 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Maha SarakhamTH · 23.5 works42×
  2. BrasovRO · 27.5 works42×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Diverse Musicological Studies than the world average.

See Diverse Musicological Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Diverse Musicological Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Mahasarakham University, University of Huddersfield and Anadolu University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%50%100%mean 20.05%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Mahasarakham University: 24, 72.4%University of Huddersfield: 14, 25.5%Anadolu University: 16, 23.5%University of Ljubljana: 25, 16.8%Istanbul Technical University: 16, 4.8%Academy of Music Theatre and Fine Arts: 13, 7.5%Saratov State Conservatory named after L. V. Sobinov: 14, 3.5%University of Maribor: 18, 30.0%Herzen University: 46, 3.2%Inonu University: 10, 13.3%Mahasarakham Univers…University of Hudder…Anadolu UniversityUniversity of Ljublj…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Mahasarakham UniversityThailand 69.472.4%46.5×24 -45.5%
2 University of HuddersfieldUnited Kingdom 63.625.5%26.9×14 +180.3%
3 Anadolu UniversityTürkiye 58.223.5%26.0×16 +254.3%
4 University of LjubljanaSlovenia 56.516.8%12.6×25 +72.6%
5 Istanbul Technical UniversityTürkiye 51.54.8%9.4×16 +255.9%
6 Academy of Music Theatre and Fine ArtsMoldova 51.47.5%587.0×13 +2883.3%
7 Saratov State Conservatory named after L. V. SobinovRussia 50.93.5%644.0×14 +330.0%
8 University of MariborSlovenia 50.730.0%20.5×18 -30.8%
9 Herzen UniversityRussia 50.03.2%112.5×46 —
10 Inonu UniversityTürkiye 49.313.3%10.5×10 +493.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Diverse Musicological Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 46% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Diverse Musicological Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.