Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies is a research topic within Transportation. Science Explorer counts 16k research works in it since 1950. 10.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on disaster recovery, urban reconstruction planning, and the impact of natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis on housing, communities, and coastal vegetation. It also explores topics related to community resilience, geological nomenclature, biotechnology education, and STEM research in the context of disaster-affected areas.
- Disaster Recovery
- Urban Reconstruction
- Housing Recovery
- Community Resilience
- Earthquake Impact
- Coastal Vegetation
- Tsunami Evacuation
- Geological Nomenclature
- Biotechnology Education
- STEM Research
- Research works
- 16k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.7k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- -13% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
United States
36% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research?
By volume, the United States and Japan publish the most (592 and 556 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
United States 592 works
- 2
Japan 556 works
- 3
United Kingdom 125 works
- 4
China 68 works
- 5
France 58 works
- 6
Australia 51 works
- 7
India 49 works
- 8
Switzerland 45 works
- 9
Germany 45 works
- 10
Canada 44 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research?
By volume in 2022-now, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (Switzerland) publishes the most Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research, followed by Health & Medical Publishing Group and The University of Tokyo.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (Switzerland)
Switzerland 33 works
- 2
Health & Medical Publishing Group
South Africa 22 works
- 3
The University of Tokyo
Japan 22 works
- 4
Tohoku University
Japan 20 works
- 5
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
France 18 works
- 6
Kyoto University
Japan 14 works
- 7
National Institute of Child Health
Hungary 13 works
- 8
Health Affairs
United States 13 works
- 9
Kyushu University
Japan 12 works
- 10
Chiba University
Japan 12 works
Who are the leading researchers in Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies include George Davey Smith, Richard M. Ryan and Richard A. Gibbs.
- 1
George Davey Smith
United Kingdom 435k citations
- 2
Richard M. Ryan
United States 395k citations
- 3
Richard A. Gibbs
United States 292k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research done?
The largest centres of Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research in 2022-now are Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom), New York (United States) and Kyoto (Japan). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cape Town, Basel and Sendai.
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
Tokyo
Japan 159 works
- 2
London
United Kingdom 44 works
- 3
New York
United States 39 works
- 4
Kyoto
Japan 34 works
- 5
Basel
Switzerland 34 works
- 6
Osaka
Japan 29 works
- 7
Sendai
Japan 29 works
- 8
Tsukuba
Japan 26 works
- 9
Beijing
China 25 works
- 10
Cape Town
South Africa 23 works
Where it is the local speciality
- Cape TownZA · 22.6 works28×
- BaselCH · 33.7 works28×
- SendaiJP · 28.8 works18×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies?
Among universities, judged by research, The University of Tokyo, Tohoku University and Kyoto University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The University of Tokyo |
76.6 | 18.6% | 10.1× | 22 | -11.7% |
| 2 | Tohoku University |
75.0 | 20.6% | 17.7× | 20 | -37.0% |
| 3 | Kyoto University |
61.2 | 23.5% | 10.8× | 14 | -44.0% |
| 4 | Hiroshima University |
57.5 | 31.2% | 14.2× | 9 | +51.5% |
| 5 | Chiba University |
55.5 | 20.3% | 26.4× | 12 | +95.9% |
| 6 | Tokyo Institute of Technology |
40.4 | 12.0% | 16.3× | 10 | +1.3% |
| 7 | Hokkaido University |
35.9 | 13.1% | 14.3× | 11 | +10.3% |
| 8 | Kyushu University |
22.2 | 9.5% | 12.3× | 12 | -46.2% |
| 9 | Nihon University |
13.0 | 6.8% | 33.4× | 11 | -32.1% |
| 10 | Kindai University |
10.8 | 6.9% | 30.5× | 9 | +687.9% |
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies, country by countryIs Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 13% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0069% in 2024.
Fractional works of Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies. Posts are plain text and can be reported.