Education and Work Dynamics
Education and Work Dynamics is a research topic within Demography. Science Explorer counts 31k research works in it since 1951. 1.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the meaning and significance of work in various contexts, including identity, globalization, education, health, and technology. It delves into the impact of work on individuals, societies, and industries, with a focus on motivation, innovation, and the challenges posed by contemporary technological advancements. The cluster also examines the intersection of work with issues such as socioeconomic paradoxes, local responses to epidemiological overlap, and the dual burden of disease.
- Work Meaning
- Significance
- Identity
- Globalization
- Education
- Health
- Ecuador
- Technology
- Motivation
- Innovation
- Research works
- 31k fractional, since 1951
- In the world top 10%
- 438 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 1.4% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -73% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Education and Work Dynamics research?
By volume, Brazil and China publish the most (491 and 275 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Brazil 491 works
- 2 China 275 works
- 3 United States 27 works
- 4 Portugal 26 works
- 5 ?? 16 works
- 6 Mexico 12 works
- 7 Spain 11 works
- 8 Thailand 10 works
- 9 Malaysia 9 works
- 10 Philippines 7 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Education and Work Dynamics research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina publishes the most Education and Work Dynamics research, followed by Universidade Federal de Santa Maria and Taishan University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaBrazil 13 works
- 2 Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrazil 12 works
- 3 Taishan UniversityChina 12 works
- 4 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 11 works
- 5 Universidade Federal FluminenseBrazil 10 works
- 6 Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrazil 10 works
- 7 Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 8 works
- 8 Universidade de BrasíliaBrazil 8 works
- 9 Universidade Federal de PernambucoBrazil 8 works
- 10 Universidade Federal do CearáBrazil 7 works
Who are the leading researchers in Education and Work Dynamics?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Education and Work Dynamics include Jun Zhang and Qiang Zhang.
- 1 Jun Zhang China 2.1k citations
- 2 Qiang Zhang China 1.7k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Education and Work Dynamics research done?
The largest centres of Education and Work Dynamics research in 2022–2025 are São Paulo (Brazil), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Belo Horizonte (Brazil) and Brasília (Brazil).
Largest cities, 2022–2025
- 1 São Paulo Brazil 66 works
- 2 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 31 works
- 3 Belo Horizonte Brazil 19 works
- 4 Brasília Brazil 19 works
- 5 Fortaleza Brazil 18 works
- 6 Beijing China 18 works
- 7 Florianópolis Brazil 17 works
- 8 Jinan China 17 works
- 9 Santa Maria Brazil 15 works
- 10 Curitiba Brazil 14 works
Where is the best place to study Education and Work Dynamics?
Among universities, judged by research, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Universidade Federal da Paraíba and Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaBrazil | 83.6 | 5.3% | 21.9× | 13 | +9.9% |
| 2 | Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrazil | 77.0 | 5.1% | 26.4× | 10 | +137.4% |
| 3 | Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil | 65.2 | 3.3% | 11.8× | 8 | +402.8% |
| 4 | Universidade de BrasíliaBrazil | 59.4 | 4.1% | 15.7× | 8 | +46.2% |
| 5 | Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrazil | 55.5 | 0.0% | 32.5× | 12 | +87.8% |
| 6 | Universidade de São PauloBrazil | 49.6 | 4.7% | 6.6× | 11 | -38.0% |
| 7 | Universidade Federal FluminenseBrazil | 45.4 | 0.0% | 22.4× | 10 | +82.1% |
| 8 | Taishan UniversityChina | 41.5 | 0.0% | 225.6× | 12 | -48.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Education and Work Dynamics research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 73% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.