Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques

Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques is a research topic within Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Science Explorer counts 7.6k research works in it since 1950. 16.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the use of electrokinetic techniques for the remediation of contaminated soils, with a particular emphasis on the removal of heavy metals and organic compounds. The papers cover various enhancement techniques, bioremediation applications, electrochemical technologies, and environmental implications such as soil dewatering and the use of geosynthetics.

  • Electrokinetic Remediation
  • Soil Contamination
  • Heavy Metals
  • Organic Compounds
  • Bioremediation
  • Enhancement Techniques
  • Electrochemical Technologies
  • Environmental Applications
  • Soil Dewatering
  • Geosynthetics
Research works
7.6k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
16.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+21%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (595 and 140 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 595 works
  2. 2 India 140 works
  3. 3 United States 77 works
  4. 4 Iran 41 works
  5. 5 Brazil 37 works
  6. 6 Iraq 34 works
  7. 7 Russia 29 works
  8. 8 Nigeria 27 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 27 works
  10. 10 Italy 25 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 57.6%India: 13.5%United States: 7.5%Iran: 3.9%6 others listed: 17.4%58%largest
China595 · 57.6%India140 · 13.5%United States77 · 7.5%Iran41 · 3.9%6 others listed180 · 17.4%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Zhejiang University publishes the most Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research, followed by Chinese Academy of Sciences and Wuhan University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Zhejiang UniversityChina 17 works
  2. 2 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 11 works
  3. 3 Wuhan UniversityChina 11 works
  4. 4 Tianjin UniversityChina 10 works
  5. 5 Central South UniversityChina 10 works
  6. 6 Hohai UniversityChina 10 works
  7. 7 Tongji UniversityChina 8 works
  8. 8 Kunming University of Science and TechnologyChina 7 works
  9. 9 China University of Mining and TechnologyChina 7 works
  10. 10 University of Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 7 works

Who are the leading researchers in Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques include Nanthi Bolan, Davey L. Jones and Mika Sillanpää.

  1. 1 Nanthi Bolan Australia 2.4k citations
  2. 2 Davey L. Jones United Kingdom 2.2k citations
  3. 3 Mika Sillanpää Finland 2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research done?

The largest centres of Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Hangzhou (China) and Shanghai (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Hangzhou and Tianjin.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 96 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 37 works
  3. 3 Hangzhou China 36 works
  4. 4 Shanghai China 35 works
  5. 5 Wuhan China 34 works
  6. 6 Tianjin China 22 works
  7. 7 Guangzhou China 22 works
  8. 8 Changsha China 19 works
  9. 9 Xi'an China 18 works
  10. 10 Baghdad Iraq 18 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. HangzhouCN · 36.1 works3.9×
  2. TianjinCN · 22.0 works3.3×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques than the world average.

See Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques on the map

Where is the best place to study Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques?

Among universities, judged by research, Central South University, Zhejiang University and Wuhan University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%30%mean 18.4667%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Central South University: 10, 23.1%Zhejiang University: 17, 12.9%Wuhan University: 11, 26.6%Tongji University: 8, 26.5%Hohai University: 10, 7.7%Tianjin University: 10, 14.0%Wuhan UniversityTongji UniversityCentral South Univer…Zhejiang University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Central South UniversityChina 50.623.1%4.3×10 +116.5%
2 Zhejiang UniversityChina 49.212.9%6.0×17 -12.2%
3 Wuhan UniversityChina 49.026.6%6.2×11 -39.3%
4 Tongji UniversityChina 45.026.5%4.5×8 +23.7%
5 Hohai UniversityChina 40.47.7%12.9×10 +37.8%
6 Tianjin UniversityChina 31.414.0%6.2×10 -19.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 21% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.