Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Hydrology and Drought Analysis is a research topic within Global and Planetary Change. Science Explorer counts 26k research works in it since 1950. 23.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the monitoring, assessment, and impacts of drought at a global scale. It covers various aspects such as the development of drought indices, the influence of global warming and climate change on drought severity and frequency, hydrological implications, remote sensing techniques for drought monitoring, and the use of evapotranspiration data. The research also delves into the challenges and future directions in drought assessment.

  • Drought
  • Monitoring
  • Global Warming
  • Hydrological
  • Indices
  • Remote Sensing
  • Climate Change
  • Evapotranspiration
  • Severity
  • Frequency
Research works
26k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
6.1k
per year above
Top-10% rate
23.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+58%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Hydrology and Drought Analysis research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (1.1k and 913 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 1.1k works
  2. 2 India 913 works
  3. 3 United States 595 works
  4. 4 Iran 269 works
  5. 5 Türkiye 242 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 170 works
  7. 7 Germany 169 works
  8. 8 Brazil 159 works
  9. 9 Italy 140 works
  10. 10 Nigeria 139 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 29.1%India: 23.2%United States: 15.1%Iran: 6.8%6 others listed: 25.8%29%largest
China1,147 · 29.1%India913 · 23.2%United States595 · 15.1%Iran269 · 6.8%6 others listed1,018 · 25.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Hydrology and Drought Analysis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Hydrology and Drought Analysis research, followed by Beijing Normal University and Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology.

Who are the leading researchers in Hydrology and Drought Analysis?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Hydrology and Drought Analysis include Adrian E. Raftery, P. D. Jones and Markus Reichstein.

  1. 1 Adrian E. Raftery United States 5k citations
  2. 2 P. D. Jones United Kingdom 3.4k citations
  3. 3 Markus Reichstein Germany 3.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Hydrology and Drought Analysis research done?

The largest centres of Hydrology and Drought Analysis research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Tehran (Iran) and Wuhan (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Roorkee and Surat.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 346 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 130 works
  3. 3 Tehran Iran 95 works
  4. 4 Wuhan China 81 works
  5. 5 New Delhi India 66 works
  6. 6 Zhengzhou China 50 works
  7. 7 Guangzhou China 48 works
  8. 8 Roorkee India 43 works
  9. 9 Xi'an China 40 works
  10. 10 Dhaka Bangladesh 40 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. RoorkeeIN · 43.1 works14×
  2. SuratIN · 21.1 works11×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Hydrology and Drought Analysis than the world average.

See Hydrology and Drought Analysis on the map

Where is the best place to study Hydrology and Drought Analysis?

Among universities, judged by research, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University and Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 36.53%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology: 39, 42.4%Beijing Normal University: 41, 46.9%Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar: 10, 64.7%Hohai University: 39, 31.8%Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee: 29, 33.2%Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique: 9, 48.2%National Institute of Technology Karnataka: 16, 26.4%Isfahan University of Technology: 15, 17.6%Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat: 19, 12.2%Wuhan University: 32, 41.9%Indian Institute of …Beijing Normal Unive…Nanjing University o…Hohai University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Nanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyChina 78.442.4%15.0×39 +203.2%
2 Beijing Normal UniversityChina 72.046.9%9.1×41 +99.7%
3 Indian Institute of Technology GandhinagarIndia 71.564.7%16.5×10 +164.3%
4 Hohai UniversityChina 66.331.8%10.9×39 +97.4%
5 Indian Institute of Technology RoorkeeIndia 65.333.2%9.9×29 +140.7%
6 Université Mohammed VI PolytechniqueMorocco 60.748.2%15.8×9
7 National Institute of Technology KarnatakaIndia 59.326.4%13.2×16 +633.3%
8 Isfahan University of TechnologyIran 56.817.6%14.2×15 +190.4%
9 Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology SuratIndia 54.112.2%17.7×19 +185.7%
10 Wuhan UniversityChina 52.541.9%4.2×32 +96.8%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Hydrology and Drought Analysis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 58% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Hydrology and Drought Analysis.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.