Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Philosophy and History of Science

Philosophy and History of Science is a research topic within History and Philosophy of Science. Science Explorer counts 31k research works in it since 1950. 31.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the concept of mechanistic explanation in scientific discovery and evolution, encompassing topics such as evolutionary synthesis, causation, genetic information, scientific models, social mechanisms, and the philosophy of science. It delves into the intricacies of biological explanation, genetic code, and developmental biology.

  • Mechanistic Explanation
  • Evolutionary Synthesis
  • Causation
  • Genetic Information
  • Scientific Models
  • Social Mechanisms
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Biological Explanation
  • Genetic Code
  • Developmental Biology
Research works
31k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
9.9k
per year above
Top-10% rate
31.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+2%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Philosophy and History of Science research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (1k and 399 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1k works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 399 works
  3. 3 Germany 289 works
  4. 4 Italy 179 works
  5. 5 France 161 works
  6. 6 Canada 130 works
  7. 7 Brazil 115 works
  8. 8 Spain 112 works
  9. 9 Netherlands 90 works
  10. 10 Australia 84 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 39.1%United Kingdom: 15.6%Germany: 11.3%Italy: 7.0%6 others listed: 27.0%39%largest
United States1,002 · 39.1%United Kingdom399 · 15.6%Germany289 · 11.3%Italy179 · 7.0%6 others listed693 · 27.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Philosophy and History of Science research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Oxford publishes the most Philosophy and History of Science research, followed by University of Vienna and University of Pittsburgh.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 46 works
  2. 2 University of ViennaAustria 29 works
  3. 3 University of PittsburghUnited States 29 works
  4. 4 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 27 works
  5. 5 University of BristolUnited Kingdom 21 works
  6. 6 Aarhus UniversityDenmark 19 works
  7. 7 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 19 works
  8. 8 UCLouvainBelgium 18 works
  9. 9 University of GenevaSwitzerland 18 works
  10. 10 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 18 works

Who are the leading researchers in Philosophy and History of Science?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Philosophy and History of Science include Robert J. Sternberg and Herbert A. Simon.

  1. 1 Robert J. Sternberg United States 4.4k citations
  2. 2 Herbert A. Simon United States 4.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Philosophy and History of Science research done?

The largest centres of Philosophy and History of Science research in 2022–2025 are Paris (France), London (United Kingdom), New York (United States) and Oxford (United Kingdom).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Paris France 78 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 75 works
  3. 3 New York United States 52 works
  4. 4 Oxford United Kingdom 49 works
  5. 5 Vienna Austria 39 works
  6. 6 Pittsburgh United States 35 works
  7. 7 Berlin Germany 32 works
  8. 8 Madrid Spain 32 works
  9. 9 Buenos Aires Argentina 31 works
  10. 10 Munich Germany 31 works
See Philosophy and History of Science on the map

Where is the best place to study Philosophy and History of Science?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Tartu, Stockholm University and University of Vienna score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 40.1%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Tartu: 9, 60.0%Stockholm University: 14, 51.8%University of Vienna: 29, 29.3%University of Oxford: 46, 28.5%University of Pittsburgh: 28, 38.3%University of California, Irvine: 18, 44.6%University of Bristol: 21, 38.3%University of Geneva: 18, 25.0%Aarhus University: 19, 42.2%Princeton University: 16, 43.0%University of TartuStockholm UniversityUniversity of ViennaUniversity of Oxford
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of TartuEstonia 71.060.0%12.9×9 +75.2%
2 Stockholm UniversitySweden 68.451.8%12.1×14 +34.5%
3 University of ViennaAustria 67.829.3%17.1×29 +105.5%
4 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 66.628.5%10.3×46 +7.6%
5 University of PittsburghUnited States 63.338.3%10.8×28 +19.9%
6 University of California, IrvineUnited States 60.544.6%8.8×18 +50.3%
7 University of BristolUnited Kingdom 60.438.3%11.2×21 -8.7%
8 University of GenevaSwitzerland 60.325.0%15.4×18 +95.5%
9 Aarhus UniversityDenmark 58.942.2%7.6×19 +23.1%
10 Princeton UniversityUnited States 58.943.0%10.7×16 -13.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Philosophy and History of Science research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 2% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2021. The fastest-growing topics are Philosophy and History of Science.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.