Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies

Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies is a research topic within History and Philosophy of Science. Science Explorer counts 8.6k research works in it since 1950. 8.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to the history of science, including the development of scientific knowledge, the role of medicine in different historical periods, the impact of colonialism on scientific practices, environmental history, philosophy of science, the scientific revolution, the establishment and evolution of museums, and the censorship of scientific ideas. The papers provide insights into how scientific knowledge has been produced, disseminated, and influenced by various social, cultural, and political factors throughout history.

  • History
  • Science
  • Knowledge Production
  • Medicine
  • Colonialism
  • Environmental History
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Revolution
  • Museums
  • Censorship
Research works
8.6k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
693
per year above
Top-10% rate
8.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+72%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research?

By volume, the United States and the United Kingdom publish the most (634 and 245 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 634 works
  2. 2 United Kingdom 245 works
  3. 3 Canada 90 works
  4. 4 Italy 75 works
  5. 5 Germany 68 works
  6. 6 France 58 works
  7. 7 China 38 works
  8. 8 Australia 37 works
  9. 9 Netherlands 36 works
  10. 10 Russia 35 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 48.2%United Kingdom: 18.6%Canada: 6.9%Italy: 5.7%6 others listed: 20.6%48%largest
United States634 · 48.2%United Kingdom245 · 18.6%Canada90 · 6.9%Italy75 · 5.7%6 others listed271 · 20.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Cambridge publishes the most Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research, followed by University of Oxford and Film Independent.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 27 works
  2. 2 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 20 works
  3. 3 Film IndependentUnited States 16 works
  4. 4 Ca' Foscari University of VeniceItaly 16 works
  5. 5 University of ViennaAustria 15 works
  6. 6 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 15 works
  7. 7 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 13 works
  8. 8 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 11 works
  9. 9 University of TorontoCanada 11 works
  10. 10 Yale UniversityUnited States 9 works

Where is Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research done?

The largest centres of Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research in 2022–2025 are London (United Kingdom), Paris (France), Los Angeles (United States) and New York (United States). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cambridge, Oxford and Los Angeles.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 London United Kingdom 46 works
  2. 2 Paris France 32 works
  3. 3 Los Angeles United States 30 works
  4. 4 New York United States 28 works
  5. 5 Cambridge United Kingdom 28 works
  6. 6 Oxford United Kingdom 24 works
  7. 7 Toronto Canada 21 works
  8. 8 Vienna Austria 20 works
  9. 9 Moscow Russia 16 works
  10. 10 Venice Italy 16 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. CambridgeGB · 27.9 works11×
  2. OxfordGB · 24.4 works8.9×
  3. Los AngelesUS · 29.7 works6.6×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies than the world average.

See Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Vienna, University of Cambridge and Ca' Foscari University of Venice score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 7.17778%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Vienna: 15, 20.3%University of Cambridge: 27, 8.3%Ca' Foscari University of Venice: 16, 14.9%University of Oxford: 20, 0.8%University of Edinburgh: 13, 2.6%University of Toronto: 11, 12.5%Durham University: 15, 2.3%University College London: 11, 2.9%Yale University: 8, 0.0%University of ViennaCa' Foscari Universi…University of Cambri…University of Oxford
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of ViennaAustria 78.620.3%20.0×15
2 University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom 67.48.3%16.6×27 +103.3%
3 Ca' Foscari University of VeniceItaly 65.614.9%42.6×16
4 University of OxfordUnited Kingdom 56.50.8%10.2×20 +142.9%
5 University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom 50.52.6%11.4×13 +141.2%
6 University of TorontoCanada 44.912.5%5.0×11 +267.9%
7 Durham UniversityUnited Kingdom 44.82.3%27.1×15 +95.6%
8 University College LondonUnited Kingdom 36.62.9%5.5×11 +300.0%
9 Yale UniversityUnited States 22.40.0%5.7×8 +425.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 72% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2019. The fastest-growing topics are Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.