Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research is a research topic within Sociology and Political Science. Science Explorer counts 7.6k research works in it since 1950. 10.2% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related set-theoretic methods in social science research. It emphasizes the exploration of causal complexity, configurational theory, and methodological pluralism, utilizing techniques such as process tracing and case study methods to understand complex causality. The cluster also highlights the integration of multi-method approaches and comparative-historical methodology in social science research.
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis
- Causal Complexity
- Fuzzy-Set Approach
- Configurational Theory
- Process Tracing
- Case Study Methods
- Complex Causality
- Methodological Pluralism
- Multi-Method Research
- Comparative-Historical Methodology
- Research works
- 7.6k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 773 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 10.2% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
- +45% the tick is no change
- Largest producer
China
35% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Which countries lead Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research?
By volume, China and the United States publish the most (586 and 450 works in 2022-now).
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
China 586 works
- 2
United States 450 works
- 3
Germany 202 works
- 4
United Kingdom 129 works
- 5
Spain 61 works
- 6
Italy 60 works
- 7
Netherlands 53 works
- 8
Canada 48 works
- 9
India 46 works
- 10
Australia 42 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research?
By volume in 2022-now, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research, followed by Sapienza University of Rome and University of Oxford.
By volume, 2022-now
- 1
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
United States 14 works
- 2
Sapienza University of Rome
Italy 9 works
- 3
University of Oxford
United Kingdom 9 works
- 4
Universitat de València
Spain 9 works
- 5
Leibniz Association
Germany 9 works
- 6
George Washington University
United States 8 works
- 7
University of California, Berkeley
United States 8 works
- 8
Mitchell Institute
United States 8 works
- 9
University of California, Los Angeles
United States 8 works
- 10
Chinese Academy of Sciences
China 7 works
Who are the leading researchers in Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research include Ronald C. Kessler, Donald B. Rubin and Virginia Braun.
- 1
Ronald C. Kessler
United States 360k citations
- 2
Donald B. Rubin
United States 301k citations
- 3
Virginia Braun
New Zealand 286k citations
- 4
Victoria Clarke
United Kingdom 285k citations
- 5
James Thomas
United Kingdom 242k citations
- 6
Peter M. Bentler
United States 233k citations
- 7
Marko Sarstedt
Germany 221k citations
- 8
Christian M. Ringle
Germany 215k citations
- 9
Anselm L. Strauss
United States 205k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research done?
The largest centres of Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), London (United Kingdom) and Nanjing (China).
Largest cities, 2022-now
- 1
Beijing
China 82 works
- 2
Shanghai
China 35 works
- 3
London
United Kingdom 30 works
- 4
Nanjing
China 29 works
- 5
Wuhan
China 29 works
- 6
Chengdu
China 25 works
- 7
Guangzhou
China 24 works
- 8
Washington D.C.
United States 23 works
- 9
New York
United States 23 works
- 10
Xi'an
China 22 works
Where is the best place to study Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research?
Among universities, judged by research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Universitat de València and University of Oxford score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
65.1 | 0.6% | 3.9× | 14 | +131.0% |
| 2 | Universitat de València |
54.5 | 13.3% | 8.5× | 9 | -22.7% |
| 3 | University of Oxford |
43.2 | 8.2% | 3.3× | 9 | +63.6% |
| 4 | Sapienza University of Rome |
17.3 | 0.0% | 4.0× | 10 | +744.6% |
Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.
Every institution in Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research, country by countryIs Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research research growing?
Output in 2022-2025 was 45% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0081% in 2024.
Fractional works of Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year.
Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research. Posts are plain text and can be reported.