Restraint-Related Deaths
Restraint-Related Deaths is a research topic within Emergency Medicine. Science Explorer counts 17k research works in it since 1950. 8.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the factors and risks associated with restraint-related deaths, focusing on topics such as excited delirium syndrome, use of conducted electrical weapons, asphyxial deaths, pulmonary edema, taser use, hanging injuries, cardiac effects, positional asphyxia, hyoid bone fractures, and the impact of electrical stun devices on physiological responses.
- Excited Delirium Syndrome
- Conducted Electrical Weapons
- Asphyxial Deaths
- Pulmonary Edema
- Taser Use
- Hanging Injuries
- Cardiac Effects
- Positional Asphyxia
- Hyoid Bone Fractures
- Electrical Stun Devices
- Research works
- 17k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.5k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 8.8% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +11% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Restraint-Related Deaths research?
By volume, the United States and India publish the most (535 and 245 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 535 works
- 2 India 245 works
- 3 Türkiye 119 works
- 4 Germany 115 works
- 5 China 105 works
- 6 United Kingdom 98 works
- 7 Japan 98 works
- 8 Italy 86 works
- 9 Australia 65 works
- 10 France 61 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Restraint-Related Deaths research?
By volume in 2022–2025, All India Institute of Medical Sciences publishes the most Restraint-Related Deaths research, followed by Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi and The University of Adelaide.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 15 works
- 2 Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye 12 works
- 3 The University of AdelaideAustralia 9 works
- 4 Sapienza University of RomeItaly 7 works
- 5 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 6 works
- 6 Institute of Medical SciencesIndia 6 works
- 7 Airlangga UniversityIndonesia 5 works
- 8 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchIndia 5 works
- 9 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 5 works
- 10 Adli Tıp KurumuTürkiye 4 works
Where is Restraint-Related Deaths research done?
The largest centres of Restraint-Related Deaths research in 2022–2025 are Istanbul (Türkiye), New Delhi (India), Tokyo (Japan) and London (United Kingdom).
Where is the best place to study Restraint-Related Deaths?
Among universities, judged by research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi and The University of Adelaide score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | All India Institute of Medical SciencesIndia | 61.3 | 2.7% | 11.5× | 15 | +84.1% |
| 2 | Sağlık Bilimleri ÜniversitesiTürkiye | 49.5 | 2.5% | 10.0× | 12 | — |
| 3 | The University of AdelaideAustralia | 40.0 | 7.3% | 9.1× | 9 | -9.7% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Restraint-Related Deaths research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 11% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Restraint-Related Deaths.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.