Deakin University vs Kaiser Permanente
On research quality in 2022-now, Kaiser Permanente ranks #426 in the world and Deakin University #428, of 22,385 institutions. Deakin University stands higher in 10 of the 14 fields both publish in, Kaiser Permanente in 4.
Compare other institutions
Deakin University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #428
- #567 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 10k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 17.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 60%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Research and Theory, Applied Psychology, Public Administration.
Kaiser Permanente
- World rank, 2022-now
- #426
- #302 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 4.5k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.6%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 34%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Family Practice, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Internal Medicine.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Deakin University leads on 5 of 8 measures: citation excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate, open access and international co-authorship. Kaiser Permanente leads on 3 of 8 measures: research quality, citations per work and growth.
- #428Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#426
- 1.43×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.04×
- 10kOutputfractional works, 2022-now4.5k
- 17.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited11.6%
- 25.1Citations per workall time, per fractional work34.3
- 60%Open accessof its works free to read, all time34%
- 25%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time8%
- +2%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+5%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Deakin University stands higher in 10 of 14 fields, Kaiser Permanente in 4. Deakin University leads most in Engineering (#426 against #1,928); Kaiser Permanente leads most in Economics, Econometrics and Finance (#451 against #606). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #557Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
- #567Arts and Humanities-
- #871Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#739
- #427Business, Management and Accounting-
- #319Computer Science-
- #203Decision Sciences-
- #606Economics, Econometrics and Finance#451
- #426Engineering#1,928
- #359Environmental Science-
- #200Health Professions#157
- #617Materials Science-
- #605Medicine#93
- #211Psychology#482
- #204Social Sciences#926
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Deakin University rank | Kaiser Permanente rank | Deakin University top 10% | Kaiser Permanente top 10% | Deakin University works | Kaiser Permanente works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #557 | - | 20.3% | - | 222 | - |
| Arts and Humanities | #567 | - | 16.1% | - | 297 | - |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #871 | #739 | 14.7% | 9.7% | 220 | 193 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #427 | - | 20.2% | - | 285 | - |
| Computer Science | #319 | - | 19.3% | - | 934 | - |
| Decision Sciences | #203 | - | 20.6% | - | 142 | - |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #606 | #451 | 14.4% | 11.0% | 184 | 74 |
| Engineering | #426 | #1,928 | 16.9% | 3.6% | 1.2k | 74 |
| Environmental Science | #359 | - | 17.1% | - | 527 | - |
| Health Professions | #200 | #157 | 19.9% | 13.4% | 486 | 238 |
| Materials Science | #617 | - | 15.5% | - | 254 | - |
| Medicine | #605 | #93 | 16.6% | 12.1% | 1.3k | 2.7k |
| Psychology | #211 | #482 | 19.8% | 10.3% | 688 | 159 |
| Social Sciences | #204 | #926 | 17.1% | 13.9% | 2k | 130 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.4× 0.0×
- Energy0.8× 0.0×
- Materials Science0.8× 0.1×
- Computer Science1.3× 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering0.8× 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.9× 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities1.1× 0.1×
- Engineering0.8× 0.1×
- Social Sciences1.7× 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.5× 0.1×
- Decision Sciences1.5× 0.3×
- Environmental Science1.1× 0.2×
- Chemistry0.4× 0.1×
- Psychology2.5× 1.3×
- Physics and Astronomy0.2× 0.1×
- Nursing1.4× 1.0×
- Neuroscience1.0× 0.8×
- Veterinary0.7× 0.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.9× 0.8×
- Mathematics0.3× 0.3×
- Health Professions2.0× 2.3×
- Dentistry0.3× 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.5× 0.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.3× 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.3× 1.5×
- Medicine0.7× 3.6×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Deakin University leans further are at the top, Kaiser Permanente's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Deakin University
- National Identity
- Overweight
- Childhood
- Chronic Diseases
- Well-being
- Gender
- Nationalism
- Identity
- Risk Factors
- Security
- Mechanical Properties
- Healthcare
- Depression
- Physical Activity
- Environmental Impact
- Prevalence
- Sustainability
- Public Health
- Mental Health
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Globalization
- Epidemiology
- Climate Change
- Social Media
- Obesity
- Neural Networks
- Adolescents
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Human Rights
- Neoliberalism
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Health Effects
- Social Justice
- Resilience
- Child Development
- Feminism
- IoT Security
- Dietary Risks
- Reflective Practice
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning520▲ 1.45×81 topics
- Machine Learning420▲ 1.22×91 topics
- Globalization401▲ 1.97×118 topics
- Mental Health370▲ 2.5×42 topics
- Epidemiology370◆ 0.90×123 topics
- Public Health355▲ 2.4×61 topics
- Climate Change345▲ 1.22×99 topics
- Sustainability318▲ 1.26×90 topics
- Social Media230▲ 1.61×35 topics
- Prevalence224▲ 5.3×14 topics
- Obesity218▲ 2.7×22 topics
- Environmental Impact216▲ 1.22×57 topics
- Neural Networks211▲ 1.32×38 topics
- Physical Activity207▲ 4.1×12 topics
- Adolescents189▲ 5.0×10 topics
- Depression189▲ 2.1×25 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease178▲ 1.51×37 topics
- Healthcare167▲ 1.41×28 topics
- Human Rights167▲ 1.57×61 topics
- Mechanical Properties163▲ 1.60×33 topics
- Neoliberalism161▲ 4.3×25 topics
- Security158▲ 2.3×27 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome157▲ 1.88×23 topics
- Risk Factors157▲ 1.38×36 topics
- Health Effects152▲ 2.4×23 topics
- Identity135▲ 1.80×46 topics
- Social Justice131▲ 2.1×38 topics
- Nationalism130▲ 2.8×25 topics
- Resilience124▲ 2.4×15 topics
- Gender120▲ 2.2×38 topics
- Child Development115▲ 2.7×9 topics
- Well-being112▲ 2.8×14 topics
- Feminism106▲ 3.5×21 topics
- Chronic Diseases101▲ 3.9×10 topics
- IoT Security100▲ 3.2×3 topics
- Childhood92▲ 13×2 topics
- Dietary Risks91▲ 14×1 topic
- Overweight91▲ 14×1 topic
- Reflective Practice84▲ 4.3×7 topics
- National Identity73▲ 6.1×7 topics
Kaiser Permanente
- Clinical Outcomes
- Mortality Risk
- Breast Cancer
- SARS-CoV-2
- Clinical Guidelines
- Radiotherapy
- Patient Satisfaction
- Anxiety
- Immunotherapy
- Complications
- Primary Care
- Clinical Trials
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Mental Health
- Depression
- Mortality
- Diagnosis
- Public Health
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Risk Factors
- Epidemiology
- Quality of Life
- Inflammation
- Treatment
- Chemotherapy
- Guidelines
- Metabolic Syndrome
- COVID-19
- Global Burden
- Management
- Obesity
- Heart Failure
- Health Disparities
- Chronic Disease Management
- Prevention
- Health-related Quality of Life
- Cancer Incidence
- Global Burden of Disease
- Cardiovascular Health
- Quality Improvement
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology625▲ 3.5×130 topics
- Risk Factors280▲ 5.7×35 topics
- Quality of Life196▲ 3.0×52 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease196▲ 3.8×36 topics
- Inflammation192▲ 2.0×80 topics
- Public Health179▲ 2.7×56 topics
- Treatment175▲ 3.2×49 topics
- Diagnosis157▲ 3.7×40 topics
- Chemotherapy147▲ 4.6×25 topics
- Mortality144▲ 5.6×13 topics
- Guidelines142▲ 6.7×13 topics
- Depression135▲ 3.4×20 topics
- Metabolic Syndrome130▲ 3.6×22 topics
- Mental Health123▲ 1.91×34 topics
- COVID-19119▲ 2.0×24 topics
- Clinical Practice Guidelines116▲ 4.7×14 topics
- Global Burden112▲ 4.6×12 topics
- Clinical Trials112▲ 3.7×19 topics
- Management110▲ 3.1×33 topics
- Primary Care104▲ 6.2×15 topics
- Obesity102▲ 3.0×23 topics
- Complications102▲ 4.6×17 topics
- Heart Failure95▲ 4.7×13 topics
- Immunotherapy94▲ 2.9×19 topics
- Health Disparities84▲ 7.2×8 topics
- Anxiety84▲ 3.9×12 topics
- Chronic Disease Management83▲ 9.4×5 topics
- Patient Satisfaction79▲ 5.6×10 topics
- Prevention78▲ 4.1×15 topics
- Radiotherapy77▲ 4.3×13 topics
- Health-related Quality of Life74▲ 6.9×5 topics
- Clinical Guidelines70▲ 5.3×9 topics
- Cancer Incidence70▲ 11×4 topics
- SARS-CoV-269▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Global Burden of Disease67▲ 6.0×4 topics
- Breast Cancer66▲ 5.8×11 topics
- Cardiovascular Health62▲ 7.1×7 topics
- Mortality Risk61▲ 5.7×6 topics
- Quality Improvement60▲ 6.9×8 topics
- Clinical Outcomes60▲ 6.2×6 topics
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Deakin University has out-published Kaiser Permanente every year since 2000, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Deakin University or Kaiser Permanente?
Deakin University publishes 2.3× as much research as Kaiser Permanente in 2022-now (10k against 4.5k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Deakin University or Kaiser Permanente?
17.2% of Deakin University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 11.6% for Kaiser Permanente.
Is Deakin University or Kaiser Permanente growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +5% against 2018-21 for Kaiser Permanente, and +2% for Deakin University.
Which has more open access research, Deakin University or Kaiser Permanente?
60% of Deakin University's research is free to read, against 34% of Kaiser Permanente's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Deakin University
- 1 Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam #4,546 worldwide 195k citations · 569 works
- 2 Andre Ferrer Carvalho #5,304 worldwide 35k citations · 318 works
- 3 Phillip Dawson #8,905 worldwide 9.1k citations · 164 works
- 4 Jake Linardon #9,105 worldwide 12k citations · 191 works
- 5 Peter Ian Macreadie #9,767 worldwide 19k citations · 336 works
Kaiser Permanente
- 1 Louis Fehrenbacher #3,426 worldwide 59k citations · 217 works
- 2 Russell E. Glasgow #7,631 worldwide 76k citations · 686 works
- 3 Alan S. Go #8,278 worldwide 178k citations · 928 works
- 4 Ousseny Zerbo #15,416 worldwide 9.4k citations · 176 works
- 5 Eric Jorgenson #16,753 worldwide 23k citations · 266 works