Atomic Weapons Establishment
In research, Atomic Weapons Establishment stands highest in Physical Sciences (#6,250 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Physics and Astronomy — Physics and Astronomy is 9.0× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #11,588 of 28,054 · #3,573 all time
- Rank in United Kingdom
- #420 of 1,094
- Research works
- 2.4k ▼ 40% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 43k 17.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.2% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
What is Atomic Weapons Establishment known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #6,250 of 12,888 | 8.0% | 131 | #2261 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Atomic Weapons Establishment sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Atomic Weapons Establishment specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Physics and Astronomy takes 9.0× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Physics and AstronomyField · 28.6 works9.0×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 9.0×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Physics and Astronomy 9.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 5.9×
- Materials Science 4.4×
- Chemistry 3.9×
- Chemical Engineering 3.2×
- Engineering 2.0×
- Decision Sciences 1.6×
- Environmental Science 1.2×
- Health Professions 1.0×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Energy 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Neuroscience 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Psychology 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.0×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Atomic Weapons Establishment?
Ranked on the composite score, J. D. Redman, S. Hinds and D. L. Youngs lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Atomic Weapons Establishment.
- 1 J. D. Redman United Kingdom · #173,265 worldwide 158 citations · 22 works
- 2 S. Hinds United Kingdom · #182,458 worldwide 190 citations · 25 works
- 3 D. L. Youngs United Kingdom · #224,471 worldwide 232 citations · 20 works
- 4 M. Sinclair United Kingdom · #242,744 worldwide 122 citations · 19 works
- 5 H. N. V. Temperley United Kingdom · #258,769 worldwide 111 citations · 32 works
- 6 John Morton United Kingdom · #363,161 worldwide 101 citations · 18 works
- 7 John W. Ferguson United Kingdom · #428,519 worldwide 49 citations · 25 works
- 8 R. J. R. Williams United Kingdom · #452,851 worldwide 170 citations · 39 works
- 9 K.J. Thomas United Kingdom · #492,388 worldwide 89 citations · 15 works
- 10 R. E. Winter United Kingdom · #682,878 worldwide 77 citations · 21 works
Which keywords describe research at Atomic Weapons Establishment?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Tomography, Health Effects, Radionuclides, Density Functional Theory, Oxidation Resistance, High Temperature Behavior, Hydrogen Embrittlement and Actinides.
- Microstructural Evolution
- Pulse Detonation Engines
- Radon
- Laser-Plasma Accelerators
- Electron Beams
- Energetic Salts
- Crystal Structure Prediction
- Ionic Liquids
- Scintillation Detectors
- Crystal Growth
- nuclear accident
- Uranium
- Neutron Imaging
- Coordination Chemistry
- Superconductivity
- Fuel Cladding
- Actinides
- High Temperature Behavior
- Density Functional Theory
- Health Effects
- Tomography
- Radionuclides
- Oxidation Resistance
- Hydrogen Embrittlement
- Accident Tolerant Fuels
- Adsorption
- Small-Angle Scattering
- Neutron Activation Analysis
- Lanthanides
- Fukushima Daiichi
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations
- Inorganic Scintillators
- Thermal Decomposition
- Plate Tectonics
- Mantle Dynamics
- ReaxFF
- Ionizing Radiation
- Lung Cancer
- Detonation Propulsion
- X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Tomography14▲ 52×4 topics
- Health Effects10▲ 11×2 topics
- Radionuclides10▲ 175×2 topics
- Density Functional Theory8▲ 53×2 topics
- Oxidation Resistance8▲ 51×3 topics
- High Temperature Behavior8▲ 89×2 topics
- Hydrogen Embrittlement7▲ 61×2 topics
- Actinides7▲ 96×2 topics
- Accident Tolerant Fuels7▲ 136×1 topic
- Fuel Cladding7▲ 136×1 topic
- Adsorption7▲ 22×2 topics
- Superconductivity7▲ 27×4 topics
- Small-Angle Scattering6▲ 84×2 topics
- Coordination Chemistry6▲ 68×2 topics
- Neutron Activation Analysis6▲ 124×1 topic
- Neutron Imaging6▲ 124×1 topic
- Lanthanides6▲ 96×1 topic
- Uranium6▲ 124×1 topic
- Fukushima Daiichi6▲ 271×1 topic
- nuclear accident6▲ 271×1 topic
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations6▲ 94×2 topics
- Crystal Growth5▲ 13×3 topics
- Inorganic Scintillators5▲ 104×1 topic
- Scintillation Detectors5▲ 104×1 topic
- Thermal Decomposition5▲ 74×2 topics
- Ionic Liquids5▲ 11×3 topics
- Plate Tectonics4▲ 20×2 topics
- Crystal Structure Prediction4▲ 63×1 topic
- Mantle Dynamics4▲ 63×1 topic
- Energetic Salts4▲ 112×1 topic
- ReaxFF4▲ 112×1 topic
- Electron Beams4▲ 148×1 topic
- Ionizing Radiation4▲ 37×2 topics
- Laser-Plasma Accelerators4▲ 148×1 topic
- Lung Cancer4▲ 15×1 topic
- Radon4▲ 112×1 topic
- Detonation Propulsion3▲ 82×1 topic
- Pulse Detonation Engines3▲ 82×1 topic
- X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy3▲ 29×2 topics
- Microstructural Evolution3▲ 15×2 topics
Which research topics does Atomic Weapons Establishment publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Nuclear Materials and Properties, Nuclear Physics and Applications, Radioactive element chemistry and processing and Radioactive contamination and transfer.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Nuclear Materials and Properties Materials Chemistry 7 works
- 2 Nuclear Physics and Applications Radiation 6 works
- 3 Radioactive element chemistry and processing Inorganic Chemistry 6 works
- 4 Radioactive contamination and transfer Global and Planetary Change 6 works
- 5 Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies Radiation 5 works
- 6 High-pressure geophysics and materials Geophysics 4 works
- 7 Energetic Materials and Combustion Mechanics of Materials 4 works
- 8 Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4 works
- 9 Radioactivity and Radon Measurements Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 4 works
- 10 Combustion and Detonation Processes Aerospace Engineering 3 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Atomic Weapons Establishment's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 40% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Reading
- University of Reading
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
- Royal Berkshire Hospital
- Intelligent Health (United Kingdom)
- Reading Museum
- Nvidia (United Kingdom)
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
- Orion Corporation (United Kingdom)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.