Bioethics International
In research, Bioethics International stands highest in Health Sciences (#12,008 of 16,688 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#12,080 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #19,053 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #3,956 of 7,310
- Research works
- 385 ▼ 18% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 3.8k 10.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 6.6% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.84× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 42% world 40%
- International
- 13% world 18%
What is Bioethics International known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health SciencesDomain | #12,008 of 16,688 | 9.4% | 174 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #12,080 of 14,833 | 7.4% | 131 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Bioethics International sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Bioethics International work in?
In 2022-now, 53% of research at Bioethics International is in Health Sciences, 34% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (37%), Health Professions (16%), Social Sciences (15%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences3152.8%
- Medicine2236.8%
- Health Professions915.6%
- Dentistry00.3%
- Nursing00.2%
- Social Sciences2033.6%
- Life Sciences58.7%
- Physical Sciences34.8%
- Computer Science23.0%
- Environmental Science00.6%
- Physics and Astronomy00.6%
- Chemistry00.4%
- Engineering00.1%
- Mathematics00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 5.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 20 fields, with their numbers
- Health Professions5.93×9 works
- Arts and Humanities2.50×4 works
- Psychology1.93×4 works
- Medicine1.91×22 works
- Social Sciences1.21×9 works
- Neuroscience1.17×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.11×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.97×3 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.87×2 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.64×0 works
- Dentistry0.58×0 works
- Computer Science0.38×2 works
- Nursing0.38×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.30×1 works
- Chemistry0.27×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.26×0 works
- Environmental Science0.13×0 works
- Decision Sciences0.10×0 works
- Mathematics0.08×0 works
- Engineering0.01×0 works
- Health Professions 5.9×
- Arts and Humanities 2.5×
- Psychology 1.9×
- Medicine 1.9×
- Social Sciences 1.2×
- Neuroscience 1.2×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.6×
- Dentistry 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.4×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Chemistry 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Decision Sciences 0.1×
- Mathematics 0.1×
- Engineering 0.0×
Which keywords describe research at Bioethics International?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Clinical Trials, Human Rights, Healthcare, Informed Consent, Ethical Guidelines, Psychological Impact, Gender Differences and Minority Recruitment.
- Stem Cell Regulation
- Psychiatry
- Regulatory Challenges
- Conflict Management
- Patient Safety
- Empathy
- Stress
- Assisted Reproductive Technology
- Ethical Climate
- Primary Care
- Infertility
- Palliative Care
- Ethical Issues
- Health Equity
- Artificial Intelligence
- Minority Recruitment
- Gender Differences
- Ethical Guidelines
- Quality of Life
- Healthcare
- Clinical Trials
- Human Rights
- Informed Consent
- Public Health
- Psychological Impact
- Research Participation
- Global Governance
- End-of-Life
- Medical Ethics
- Ethical Considerations
- Patient Satisfaction
- Social Inequality
- Moral Distress
- Global Trends
- Access to Care
- Medical Education
- Reproductive Technologies
- Healthcare Access
- Direct-to-Consumer Marketing
- Social Determinants
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Clinical Trials5▲ 12×6 topics
- Healthcare4▲ 6.2×8 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 7.0×12 topics
- Quality of Life4▲ 4.2×9 topics
- Informed Consent3▲ 74×3 topics
- Ethical Guidelines3▲ 91×2 topics
- Public Health3▲ 3.4×13 topics
- Gender Differences3▲ 13×2 topics
- Psychological Impact3▲ 15×4 topics
- Minority Recruitment3▲ 179×1 topic
- Research Participation3▲ 179×1 topic
- Artificial Intelligence2▲ 3.0×7 topics
- Global Governance2▲ 16×2 topics
- Health Equity2▲ 12×3 topics
- End-of-Life2▲ 37×3 topics
- Ethical Issues2▲ 30×3 topics
- Medical Ethics2▲ 25×5 topics
- Palliative Care2▲ 21×3 topics
- Ethical Considerations2▲ 8.8×5 topics
- Infertility2▲ 21×2 topics
- Patient Satisfaction2▲ 10×2 topics
- Primary Care2▲ 8.2×6 topics
- Social Inequality2▲ 11×2 topics
- Ethical Climate2▲ 103×1 topic
- Moral Distress2▲ 103×1 topic
- Assisted Reproductive Technology2▲ 44×2 topics
- Global Trends2▲ 34×2 topics
- Stress2▲ 7.6×3 topics
- Access to Care2▲ 66×1 topic
- Empathy2▲ 22×3 topics
- Medical Education2▲ 9.7×4 topics
- Patient Safety2▲ 17×4 topics
- Reproductive Technologies2▲ 66×1 topic
- Conflict Management1▲ 88×2 topics
- Healthcare Access1▲ 8.4×4 topics
- Regulatory Challenges1▲ 26×2 topics
- Direct-to-Consumer Marketing1▲ 99×1 topic
- Psychiatry1▲ 93×2 topics
- Social Determinants1▲ 11×3 topics
- Stem Cell Regulation1▲ 99×1 topic
Which research topics does Bioethics International publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Ethics in Clinical Research, Ethics in medical practice, Reproductive Health and Technologies and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ethics in Clinical Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3 works
- 2 Ethics in medical practice General Health Professions 2 works
- 3 Reproductive Health and Technologies Reproductive Medicine 2 works
- 4 Biomedical Ethics and Regulation Physiology 1 works
- 5 Empathy and Medical Education Psychiatry and Mental health 1 works
- 6 Legal Systems and Judicial Processes Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 7 Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1 works
- 8 Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1 works
- 9 Evolution and Science Education History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
- 10 Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Bioethics International's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 18% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Bioethics International as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00023% in 2024.
Fractional works of Bioethics International over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Cambridge
- Harvard University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- World Wide Web Consortium
- Biogen (United States)
- Draper Laboratory
- Cambridge Health Alliance
- Harvard Global Health Institute
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Bioethics International. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
