World Wide Web Consortium
In research, World Wide Web Consortium stands highest in Information Systems (#2,378 of 2,566 worldwide), Medicine (#13,770 of 14,558 worldwide) and Computer Science (#6,072 of 6,336 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #17,972 of 22,385 · #30,468 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,638 of 3,332
- Research works
- 6.5k ▲ 21% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 23k 3.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.3% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.16× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 3% world 40%
- International
- 4% world 18%
What is World Wide Web Consortium known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information SystemsSubfield | #2,378 of 2,566 | 9.3% | 401 | |
| MedicineField | #13,770 of 14,558 | 9.2% | 790 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #6,072 of 6,336 | 9.5% | 827 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #16,026 of 16,688 | 9.4% | 884 | |
| Molecular BiologySubfield | #3,600 of 3,729 | 10.3% | 211 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #5,609 of 5,801 | 9.8% | 350 | |
| Artificial IntelligenceSubfield | #2,720 of 2,786 | 10.6% | 214 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #10,772 of 11,023 | 9.0% | 849 | |
| EngineeringField | #9,355 of 9,532 | 8.0% | 1,421 | |
| ChemistryField | #2,849 of 2,902 | 8.2% | 199 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where World Wide Web Consortium sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does World Wide Web Consortium work in?
In 2022-now, 51% of research at World Wide Web Consortium is in Health Sciences, 19% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (48%), Social Sciences (9%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (9%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Health Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences3950.6%
- Medicine3748.0%
- Health Professions22.1%
- Nursing00.6%
- Physical Sciences1518.8%
- Computer Science67.4%
- Engineering56.8%
- Environmental Science11.8%
- Materials Science11.5%
- Chemistry00.6%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
- Mathematics00.2%
- Physics and Astronomy00.1%
- Social Sciences1316.5%
- Life Sciences1114.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 2.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 22 fields, with their numbers
- Medicine2.49×37 works
- Neuroscience1.72×2 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.67×7 works
- Arts and Humanities1.60×4 works
- Immunology and Microbiology1.50×1 works
- Nursing1.16×0 works
- Computer Science0.95×6 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.81×0 works
- Health Professions0.80×2 works
- Social Sciences0.71×7 works
- Psychology0.49×1 works
- Engineering0.46×5 works
- Materials Science0.42×1 works
- Chemistry0.38×0 works
- Environmental Science0.36×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.33×1 works
- Mathematics0.21×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.20×0 works
- Decision Sciences0.15×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.13×0 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.08×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.05×0 works
- Medicine 2.5×
- Neuroscience 1.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.7×
- Arts and Humanities 1.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.5×
- Nursing 1.2×
- Computer Science 0.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.8×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Social Sciences 0.7×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Chemistry 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Decision Sciences 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at World Wide Web Consortium?
Ranked on the quality score, Eric Prud’hommeaux, Shadi Abou-Zahra and Judy Brewer lead among researchers whose main affiliation is World Wide Web Consortium.
- 1
Eric Prud’hommeaux
United States · #3,012,874 worldwide 4.4k citations · 80 works
- 2
Shadi Abou-Zahra
United States · #5,282,397 worldwide 448 citations · 25 works
- 3
Judy Brewer
United States · #5,389,445 worldwide 382 citations · 18 works
- 4
Shawn Lawton Henry
United States · #6,032,906 worldwide 525 citations · 20 works
- 5
Ralph R. Swick
United States · #6,118,262 worldwide 600 citations · 19 works
- 6
Dave Raggett
United States · #6,446,022 worldwide 447 citations · 48 works
- 7
Liam R. E. Quin
United States · #6,631,765 worldwide 51 citations · 26 works
- 8
Simone Onofri
United States · #6,838,965 worldwide 6 citations · 15 works
- 9
Max Froumentin
United States · #6,885,324 worldwide 61 citations · 20 works
- 10
家谟 傅
United States · #6,922,392 worldwide 12 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at World Wide Web Consortium?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Inflammation, Cancer, Oxidative Stress, Heart Failure, Echocardiography, Obesity, Epidemiology and Myocardial Infarction.
- Ontology
- Inflammatory Response
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Transparency
- Radiomics
- Low-Literacy Users
- Fibrosis
- User-Generated Content
- Semantic Web
- Quantitative Analysis
- Feminism
- Rural Communities
- Cytokines
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Data Integration
- Cardiovascular Risk
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure
- Cancer
- Epidemiology
- Inflammation
- Oxidative Stress
- Obesity
- Risk Factors
- Myocardial Infarction
- Extracellular Matrix
- Macrophages
- Trust
- Neuroprotection
- Community Health Workers
- Neuroimaging
- Radiosurgery
- Texture Analysis
- E-Government
- Ischemic Stroke
- Mobile Technology
- Revascularization
- Tumor Heterogeneity
- Cardiac Remodeling
- Linked Data
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Inflammation5▲ 3.1×38 topics
- Epidemiology4▲ 1.44×30 topics
- Oxidative Stress4▲ 2.9×21 topics
- Cancer4▲ 3.5×21 topics
- Obesity2▲ 4.1×10 topics
- Heart Failure2▲ 6.9×7 topics
- Risk Factors2▲ 2.4×11 topics
- Echocardiography2▲ 8.8×5 topics
- Myocardial Infarction2▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Cardiovascular Risk2▲ 6.3×4 topics
- Extracellular Matrix2▲ 11×4 topics
- Data Integration2▲ 12×4 topics
- Macrophages2▲ 11×5 topics
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging2▲ 7.8×5 topics
- Trust2▲ 7.1×4 topics
- Cytokines1▲ 6.1×4 topics
- Neuroprotection1▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Rural Communities1▲ 32×2 topics
- Community Health Workers1▲ 18×2 topics
- Feminism1▲ 5.8×3 topics
- Neuroimaging1▲ 6.1×6 topics
- Quantitative Analysis1▲ 7.8×3 topics
- Radiosurgery1▲ 18×3 topics
- Semantic Web1▲ 18×3 topics
- Texture Analysis1▲ 7.8×2 topics
- User-Generated Content1▲ 13×2 topics
- E-Government1▲ 19×1 topic
- Fibrosis1▲ 7.8×3 topics
- Ischemic Stroke1▲ 10×2 topics
- Low-Literacy Users1▲ 93×1 topic
- Mobile Technology1▲ 93×1 topic
- Radiomics1▲ 13×1 topic
- Revascularization1▲ 9.7×2 topics
- Transparency1▲ 11×1 topic
- Tumor Heterogeneity1▲ 13×1 topic
- Type 2 Diabetes1▲ 6.7×5 topics
- Cardiac Remodeling1▲ 30×2 topics
- Inflammatory Response1▲ 20×2 topics
- Linked Data1▲ 37×1 topic
- Ontology1▲ 19×1 topic
Which research topics does World Wide Web Consortium publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: E-Government and Public Services, ICT in Developing Communities, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging and Semantic Web and Ontologies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 E-Government and Public Services Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 2 ICT in Developing Communities Information Systems 1 works
- 3 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 4 Semantic Web and Ontologies Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 5 Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Epidemiology 1 works
- 6 Educational Tools and Methods Safety Research 1 works
- 7 Open Source Software Innovations Computer Science Applications 1 works
- 8 Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 9 Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 10 Meningioma and schwannoma management Epidemiology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has World Wide Web Consortium's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 21% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is World Wide Web Consortium as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00024% in 2024.
Fractional works of World Wide Web Consortium over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 13.0% in 2014.
Other research institutions in Cambridge
- Harvard University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Biogen (United States)
- Draper Laboratory
- Cambridge Health Alliance
- Harvard Global Health Institute
- Digital Science (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about World Wide Web Consortium. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
