World Wide Web Consortium
In research, World Wide Web Consortium stands highest in Engineering (#3,406 of 11,412 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,238 of 16,945 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#7,088 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,662 of 28,054 · #8,043 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,063 of 4,192
- Research works
- 6.5k ▼ 68% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 23k 3.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 37.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 3% world 28%
What is World Wide Web Consortium known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EngineeringField | #3,406 of 11,412 | 0.7% | 1,421 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #5,238 of 16,945 | 1.8% | 1,411 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #7,088 of 21,541 | 1.2% | 3,373 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,703 of 10,206 | 2.0% | 669 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #3,524 of 7,020 | 3.1% | 827 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #10,289 of 20,462 | 3.7% | 884 | |
| MedicineField | #10,638 of 17,978 | 4.0% | 790 | |
| Life SciencesDomain | #8,877 of 14,347 | 2.1% | 849 | |
| Information SystemsSubfield | #1,791 of 2,575 | 2.6% | 401 | |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField | #6,832 of 7,814 | 3.7% | 350 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where World Wide Web Consortium sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 2.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Medicine 2.8×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2.0×
- Neuroscience 1.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 1.8×
- Nursing 1.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.0×
- Health Professions 1.0×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Social Sciences 0.6×
- Chemistry 0.5×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.4×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Decision Sciences 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at World Wide Web Consortium?
Ranked on the composite score, Guo Jian, Zhang Shi and Huang Xiao lead among researchers whose main affiliation is World Wide Web Consortium.
- 1 Guo Jian United States · #310,737 worldwide 0 citations · 33 works
- 2 Zhang Shi United States · #901,737 worldwide 7 citations · 19 works
- 3 Huang Xiao United States · #1,091,645 worldwide 8 citations · 16 works
- 4 Wang Xiao United States · #1,269,015 worldwide 1 citations · 55 works
- 5 Liu Sy United States · #1,312,434 worldwide 5 citations · 30 works
- 6 Wu Yu United States · #1,409,286 worldwide 1 citations · 26 works
- 7 Huang Jia United States · #1,417,346 worldwide 1 citations · 27 works
- 8 Zeng Xiao United States · #1,466,359 worldwide 3 citations · 18 works
- 9 Rosen United States · #1,608,987 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
Which keywords describe research at World Wide Web Consortium?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Inflammation, Cancer, Heart Failure, Obesity, Epidemiology, Oxidative Stress, Myocardial Infarction and Echocardiography.
- Thrombolysis
- E-Government
- Chamber Quantification
- Trust
- Clinical Outcomes
- Radiosurgery
- Quantitative Analysis
- Fibrosis
- Texture Analysis
- Prognostic Factors
- Neuroimaging
- Surgical Management
- Medical Imaging
- Aging
- Extracellular Matrix
- Echocardiography
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Obesity
- Oxidative Stress
- Epidemiology
- Inflammation
- Cancer
- Heart Failure
- Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Risk
- Myocardial Infarction
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Macrophages
- Precision Medicine
- Cytokines
- Neuroprotection
- Radiotherapy
- User-Generated Content
- Ischemic Stroke
- Radiomics
- Type 2 Diabetes
- DNA Methylation
- Cardiac Remodeling
- Diastolic Function
- Endovascular Therapy
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Inflammation4▲ 3.5×37 topics
- Epidemiology4▲ 1.71×30 topics
- Cancer3▲ 4.2×21 topics
- Oxidative Stress3▲ 2.9×20 topics
- Heart Failure2▲ 9.0×7 topics
- Obesity2▲ 5.2×9 topics
- Risk Factors2▲ 2.8×10 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 2.6×16 topics
- Cardiovascular Risk2▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Echocardiography2▲ 9.5×5 topics
- Myocardial Infarction2▲ 11×4 topics
- Extracellular Matrix2▲ 14×4 topics
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging2▲ 9.4×5 topics
- Aging1▲ 4.2×7 topics
- Macrophages1▲ 13×5 topics
- Medical Imaging1▲ 4.4×2 topics
- Precision Medicine1▲ 4.8×4 topics
- Surgical Management1▲ 5.4×6 topics
- Cytokines1▲ 7.8×4 topics
- Neuroimaging1▲ 7.8×6 topics
- Neuroprotection1▲ 6.2×4 topics
- Prognostic Factors1▲ 5.0×4 topics
- Radiotherapy1▲ 5.5×3 topics
- Texture Analysis1▲ 9.5×2 topics
- User-Generated Content1▲ 16×2 topics
- Fibrosis1▲ 10×3 topics
- Ischemic Stroke1▲ 13×2 topics
- Quantitative Analysis1▲ 9.7×2 topics
- Radiomics1▲ 16×1 topic
- Radiosurgery1▲ 21×3 topics
- Type 2 Diabetes1▲ 8.8×5 topics
- Clinical Outcomes1▲ 8.2×2 topics
- DNA Methylation1▲ 15×2 topics
- Trust1▲ 6.7×3 topics
- Cardiac Remodeling1▲ 38×2 topics
- Chamber Quantification1▲ 21×1 topic
- Diastolic Function1▲ 21×1 topic
- E-Government1▲ 20×1 topic
- Endovascular Therapy1▲ 25×1 topic
- Thrombolysis1▲ 25×1 topic
Which research topics does World Wide Web Consortium publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling, E-Government and Public Services and Open Source Software Innovations.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
- 2 Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 3 E-Government and Public Services Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 4 Open Source Software Innovations Computer Science Applications 1 works
- 5 Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Epidemiology 1 works
- 6 Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
- 7 Meningioma and schwannoma management Epidemiology 1 works
- 8 Law, AI, and Intellectual Property Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 9 Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging Biomedical Engineering 1 works
- 10 Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has World Wide Web Consortium's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 68% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Cambridge
- Harvard University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- IIT@MIT
- Broad Institute
- Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
- Draper Laboratory
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.