Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Institution · Cambridge · United States

World Wide Web Consortium

In research, World Wide Web Consortium stands highest in Engineering (#3,406 of 11,412 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,238 of 16,945 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#7,088 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, 2022–2025
#14,662
of 28,054 · #8,043 all time
Rank in United States
#2,063
of 4,192
Research works
6.5k
▼ 68% vs 2013–17
Citations
23k
3.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
37.1%
record average 16.5%
Open access
3%
world 28%

What is World Wide Web Consortium known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
EngineeringField #3,406 of 11,412 0.7%1,421
Social SciencesDomain #5,238 of 16,945 1.8%1,411
Physical SciencesDomain #7,088 of 21,541 1.2%3,373
Social SciencesField #3,703 of 10,206 2.0%669
Computer ScienceField #3,524 of 7,020 3.1%827
Health SciencesDomain #10,289 of 20,462 3.7%884
MedicineField #10,638 of 17,978 4.0%790
Life SciencesDomain #8,877 of 14,347 2.1%849
Information SystemsSubfield #1,791 of 2,575 2.6%401
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyField #6,832 of 7,814 3.7%350

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where World Wide Web Consortium sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.98× its world share, 6 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.77× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.79× its world share, 2 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1.03× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.48× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.69× its world share, 3 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.47× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 1.02× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.82× its world share, 33 worksMedicineNursing: 1.47× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.43× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.62× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 2.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at World Wide Web Consortium?

Ranked on the composite score, Guo Jian, Zhang Shi and Huang Xiao lead among researchers whose main affiliation is World Wide Web Consortium.

  1. 1 Guo Jian United States · #310,737 worldwide 0 citations · 33 works
  2. 2 Zhang Shi United States · #901,737 worldwide 7 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Huang Xiao United States · #1,091,645 worldwide 8 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Wang Xiao United States · #1,269,015 worldwide 1 citations · 55 works
  5. 5 Liu Sy United States · #1,312,434 worldwide 5 citations · 30 works
  6. 6 Wu Yu United States · #1,409,286 worldwide 1 citations · 26 works
  7. 7 Huang Jia United States · #1,417,346 worldwide 1 citations · 27 works
  8. 8 Zeng Xiao United States · #1,466,359 worldwide 3 citations · 18 works
  9. 9 Rosen United States · #1,608,987 worldwide 4 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at World Wide Web Consortium

Which keywords describe research at World Wide Web Consortium?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Inflammation, Cancer, Heart Failure, Obesity, Epidemiology, Oxidative Stress, Myocardial Infarction and Echocardiography.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Inflammation4▲ 3.5×37 topics
  2. Epidemiology4▲ 1.71×30 topics
  3. Cancer3▲ 4.2×21 topics
  4. Oxidative Stress3▲ 2.9×20 topics
  5. Heart Failure2▲ 9.0×7 topics
  6. Obesity2▲ 5.2×9 topics
  7. Risk Factors2▲ 2.8×10 topics
  8. Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 2.6×16 topics
  9. Cardiovascular Risk2▲ 8.2×4 topics
  10. Echocardiography2▲ 9.5×5 topics
  11. Myocardial Infarction2▲ 11×4 topics
  12. Extracellular Matrix2▲ 14×4 topics
  13. Magnetic Resonance Imaging2▲ 9.4×5 topics
  14. Aging1▲ 4.2×7 topics
  15. Macrophages1▲ 13×5 topics
  16. Medical Imaging1▲ 4.4×2 topics
  17. Precision Medicine1▲ 4.8×4 topics
  18. Surgical Management1▲ 5.4×6 topics
  19. Cytokines1▲ 7.8×4 topics
  20. Neuroimaging1▲ 7.8×6 topics
  21. Neuroprotection1▲ 6.2×4 topics
  22. Prognostic Factors1▲ 5.0×4 topics
  23. Radiotherapy1▲ 5.5×3 topics
  24. Texture Analysis1▲ 9.5×2 topics
  25. User-Generated Content1▲ 16×2 topics
  26. Fibrosis1▲ 10×3 topics
  27. Ischemic Stroke1▲ 13×2 topics
  28. Quantitative Analysis1▲ 9.7×2 topics
  29. Radiomics1▲ 16×1 topic
  30. Radiosurgery1▲ 21×3 topics
  31. Type 2 Diabetes1▲ 8.8×5 topics
  32. Clinical Outcomes1▲ 8.2×2 topics
  33. DNA Methylation1▲ 15×2 topics
  34. Trust1▲ 6.7×3 topics
  35. Cardiac Remodeling1▲ 38×2 topics
  36. Chamber Quantification1▲ 21×1 topic
  37. Diastolic Function1▲ 21×1 topic
  38. E-Government1▲ 20×1 topic
  39. Endovascular Therapy1▲ 25×1 topic
  40. Thrombolysis1▲ 25×1 topic

Which research topics does World Wide Web Consortium publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling, E-Government and Public Services and Open Source Software Innovations.

  1. 1 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
  2. 2 Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  3. 3 E-Government and Public Services Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  4. 4 Open Source Software Innovations Computer Science Applications 1 works
  5. 5 Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Epidemiology 1 works
  6. 6 Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1 works
  7. 7 Meningioma and schwannoma management Epidemiology 1 works
  8. 8 Law, AI, and Intellectual Property Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  9. 9 Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging Biomedical Engineering 1 works
  10. 10 Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available2.7%not open97.3%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors3.6%domestic only96.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has World Wide Web Consortium's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 68% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Cambridge

All research institutions in Cambridge

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.