Center for Large Landscape Conservation
- Research works
- 22 ▼ 42% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1k 47.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.9% all institutions 10.0%
- Open access
- 78% world 40%
- International
- 26% world 18%
Not ranked overall: Center for Large Landscape Conservation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Which fields of science does Center for Large Landscape Conservation work in?
In all years, 79% of research at Center for Large Landscape Conservation is in Physical Sciences, 13% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (74%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (10%), Computer Science (3%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Physical Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences1779.0%
- Environmental Science1674.4%
- Computer Science12.8%
- Engineering00.8%
- Physics and Astronomy00.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
- Mathematics00.1%
- Life Sciences313.5%
- Social Sciences14.2%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.8%
- Psychology01.5%
- Social Sciences01.0%
- Health Sciences13.3%
- Medicine12.4%
- Health Professions00.8%
- Veterinary00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 15.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 14 fields, with their numbers
- Environmental Science15.12×6 works
- Veterinary3.27×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology2.97×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.05×0 works
- Health Professions0.84×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.67×0 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.57×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.53×0 works
- Mathematics0.32×0 works
- Psychology0.29×0 works
- Computer Science0.21×0 works
- Medicine0.18×0 works
- Engineering0.10×0 works
- Social Sciences0.07×0 works
- Environmental Science 15.1×
- Veterinary 3.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.1×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.3×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Center for Large Landscape Conservation?
Ranked on the quality score, Gary Tabor, Annika T. H. Keeley and Gabriel Oppler lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Center for Large Landscape Conservation.
- 1
Gary Tabor
United States · #204,026 worldwide 6.3k citations · 60 works
- 2
Annika T. H. Keeley
United States · #428,190 worldwide 2.4k citations · 39 works
- 3
Gabriel Oppler
United States · #2,756,410 worldwide 519 citations · 24 works
- 4
Tyler G. Creech
United States · #3,139,363 worldwide 611 citations · 34 works
Which keywords describe research at Center for Large Landscape Conservation?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biodiversity, Biodiversity Conservation, Environmental Impact, Spatial Patterns, Habitat Connectivity, Road Ecology and Conservation Biology.
- Forest Carbon Sequestration
- Climate Change Impacts
- Spatial Dynamics
- Forest Pests
- Environmental Policy
- Global Warming
- Sustainability
- Land Use Change
- Ecological Niche
- Occupancy Rates
- Invasive Species
- Conservation Biology
- Road Ecology
- Environmental Impact
- Biodiversity
- Climate Change
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Habitat Connectivity
- Spatial Patterns
- Population Dynamics
- Animal Movement
- Model Evaluation
- Species Distribution Modeling
- Ecosystem Services
- Biological Invasions
- Economic Impacts
- Bark Beetles
- Global Impact
- Urbanization
- Conservation
- Habitat Fragmentation
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 31 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 31 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change7▲ 12×19 topics
- Biodiversity5▲ 28×9 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation4▲ 65×7 topics
- Environmental Impact4▲ 12×2 topics
- Habitat Connectivity3▲ 1379×1 topic
- Road Ecology3▲ 1379×1 topic
- Spatial Patterns3▲ 221×2 topics
- Conservation Biology3▲ 125×3 topics
- Population Dynamics3▲ 46×5 topics
- Invasive Species3▲ 23×9 topics
- Animal Movement3▲ 211×1 topic
- Occupancy Rates3▲ 211×1 topic
- Model Evaluation3▲ 114×2 topics
- Ecological Niche3▲ 248×1 topic
- Species Distribution Modeling3▲ 248×1 topic
- Land Use Change2▲ 34×3 topics
- Ecosystem Services2▲ 25×4 topics
- Sustainability2▲ 4.6×5 topics
- Biological Invasions2▲ 69×2 topics
- Global Warming2▲ 18×3 topics
- Economic Impacts1▲ 99×2 topics
- Environmental Policy1▲ 40×2 topics
- Bark Beetles1▲ 213×1 topic
- Forest Pests1▲ 213×1 topic
- Global Impact1▲ 48×1 topic
- Spatial Dynamics1▲ 107×1 topic
- Urbanization1▲ 20×2 topics
- Climate Change Impacts1▲ 34×1 topic
- Conservation1▲ 11×6 topics
- Forest Carbon Sequestration1▲ 196×1 topic
- Habitat Fragmentation1▲ 16×3 topics
Which research topics does Center for Large Landscape Conservation publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Species Distribution and Climate Change and Land Use and Ecosystem Services.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation Ecology 2 works
- 2 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 1 works
- 3 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 1 works
- 4 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 0 works
- 5 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 0 works
- 6 Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
- 7 Rabies epidemiology and control Virology 0 works
- 8 Veterinary Practice and Education Studies Speech and Hearing 0 works
- 9 Human-Animal Interaction Studies Genetics 0 works
- 10 Zoonotic diseases and public health Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Center for Large Landscape Conservation's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 42% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Center for Large Landscape Conservation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000035% in 2024.
Fractional works of Center for Large Landscape Conservation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Bozeman
- Montana State University
- Eagle Mount
- BioScience Laboratories (United States)
- Yellowstone Ecological Research Center
- Wild Sheep Foundation
- S2 Corporation (United States)
- Bozeman Health Deaconess Hospital
- Montana Molecular (United States)
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Center for Large Landscape Conservation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.