Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Chandler · United States

Chandler–Gilbert Community College

cgc.eduROR OpenAlex
Research works
96
▲ 16% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.9k
30.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
38%
world 40%
International
15%
world 18%
Chandler–Gilbert Community College

Not ranked overall: Chandler–Gilbert Community College is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Chandler–Gilbert Community College work in?

In 2022-now, 40% of research at Chandler–Gilbert Community College is in Social Sciences, 28% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (26%), Social Sciences (24%), Engineering (11%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 12 fractional works · 40.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 24.0% of its workEducation: 3 fractional works · 9.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 2 fractional works · 6.4% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workManagement Information Systems: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 9 fractional works · 28.3% of its workMedicine: 8 fractional works · 25.9% of its workRehabilitation: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 7 fractional works · 22.9% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 11.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 5.4% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPaleontology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 8.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 4.3% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKChandler–GilbertCommunity College30fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences8%Physical Sciences23%Health Sciences28%Social Sciences40%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 21 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences724.0%
    2. Arts and Humanities26.4%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting14.4%
    4. Psychology14.2%
    5. Decision Sciences01.1%
    6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.3%
    1. Medicine825.9%
    2. Dentistry12.2%
    3. Health Professions00.2%
    1. Engineering311.2%
    2. Computer Science25.4%
    3. Environmental Science12.3%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences01.1%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.9%
    6. Energy00.7%
    7. Mathematics00.6%
    8. Materials Science00.4%
    9. Chemistry00.4%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology14.3%
    2. Neuroscience12.7%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.81× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.69× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.69× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.71× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.80× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.74× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.46× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.47× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 4.56× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.35× its world share, 8 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.24× its world share, 2 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.36× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.12× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.39× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.89× its world share, 7 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 21 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry4.56×1 works
  2. Arts and Humanities2.24×2 works
  3. Social Sciences1.89×7 works
  4. Neuroscience1.69×1 works
  5. Psychology1.39×1 works
  6. Business, Management and Accounting1.36×1 works
  7. Medicine1.35×8 works
  8. Decision Sciences1.12×0 works
  9. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.81×1 works
  10. Energy0.80×0 works
  11. Engineering0.74×3 works
  12. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.71×0 works
  13. Computer Science0.69×2 works
  14. Mathematics0.47×0 works
  15. Environmental Science0.46×1 works
  16. Physics and Astronomy0.41×0 works
  17. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.27×0 works
  18. Chemistry0.24×0 works
  19. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.13×0 works
  20. Materials Science0.11×0 works
  21. Health Professions0.07×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Chandler–Gilbert Community College?

Ranked on the quality score, Bassam Matar and Gerald C. Kukal lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Chandler–Gilbert Community College.

  1. 1 Bassam Matar United States · #3,686,252 worldwide 80 citations · 19 works
  2. 2 Gerald C. Kukal United States · #4,066,660 worldwide 72 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at Chandler–Gilbert Community College

What are the most cited papers from Chandler–Gilbert Community College?

The most cited paper from Chandler–Gilbert Community College is "Severe Periodontitis and Risk for Poor Glycemic Control in Patients with Non‐Insulin‐Dependent Diabetes Mellitus" (George W. Taylor, Brian A. Burt, Mark P. Becker et al., 1996), with 649 citations. Next come "Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Periodontal Disease" (372) and "Pivotal Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Orbital Atherectomy System in Treating De Novo, Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions (ORBIT II)" (333).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Severe Periodontitis and Risk for Poor Glycemic Control in Patients with Non‐Insulin‐Dependent Diabetes Mellitus George W. Taylor, Brian A. Burt, Mark P. Becker et al. · Journal of Periodontology Open access Oct 1996 649
2 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Periodontal Disease Marc Shlossman, William C. Knowler, David J. Pettitt et al. · The Journal of the American Dental Association Oct 1990 372
3 Pivotal Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Orbital Atherectomy System in Treating De Novo, Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions (ORBIT II) Jeffrey W. Chambers et al. · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions Open access May 2014 333
4 Non‐Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Alveolar Bone Loss Progression Over 2 Years George W. Taylor, Brian A. Burt, Mark P. Becker et al. · Journal of Periodontology Open access 1998 315
5 Glycemic Control and Alveolar Bone Loss Progression in Type 2 Diabetes George W. Taylor, Brian A. Burt, Mark P. Becker et al. · Annals of Periodontology Open access Jul 1998 284
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Chandler–Gilbert Community College?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Motor Recovery, Neural Plasticity, Higher Education, Online Learning, Religion, Educational Technology, Inclusive Education and E-Learning.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 18 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 18 words, with their numbers
  1. Motor Recovery2▲ 70×1 topic
  2. Neural Plasticity2▲ 30×1 topic
  3. Educational Technology2▲ 4.4×5 topics
  4. Higher Education2▲ 9.7×3 topics
  5. E-Learning1▲ 4.8×3 topics
  6. Globalization1▲ 2.4×4 topics
  7. Online Learning1▲ 5.8×4 topics
  8. Epidemiology1◆ 1.04×9 topics
  9. Inclusive Education1▲ 11×3 topics
  10. Religion1▲ 8.8×5 topics
  11. Sustainability1▲ 1.70×4 topics
  12. Atlantic History1▲ 215×1 topic
  13. Business Process Management1▲ 156×1 topic
  14. Convention Attendees1▲ 387×1 topic
  15. Student Perceptions1▲ 19×3 topics
  16. Trade Shows1▲ 387×1 topic
  17. Transatlantic Slave Trade1▲ 215×1 topic
  18. Workflow Mining1▲ 156×1 topic

Which research topics does Chandler–Gilbert Community College publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Colonialism, slavery, and trade and Conferences and Exhibitions Management.

Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: 2 fractional worksBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis: 1 fractional worksColonialism, slavery, an…1Colonialism, slavery, and trade: 1 fractional worksConferences and Exhibiti…1Conferences and Exhibitions Management: 1 fractional worksSecond Language Learning and Teaching: 1 fractional worksInnovative Teaching Methods: 1 fractional worksEEG and Brain-Computer I…1EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces: 1 fractional worksE-Learning and COVID-19: 0 fractional worksOnline and Blended Learning: 0 fractional worksGastrointestinal disorders and treatments: 0 fractional works
RehabilitationManagement Information SystemsAnthropologySociology and Political Science4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery Rehabilitation 2 works
  2. 2 Business Process Modeling and Analysis Management Information Systems 1 works
  3. 3 Colonialism, slavery, and trade Anthropology 1 works
  4. 4 Conferences and Exhibitions Management Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Second Language Learning and Teaching Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
  6. 6 Innovative Teaching Methods Education 1 works
  7. 7 EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  8. 8 E-Learning and COVID-19 Education 0 works
  9. 9 Online and Blended Learning Education 0 works
  10. 10 Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available38.4%not open61.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors15.4%domestic only84.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Chandler–Gilbert Community College's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 16% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Chandler–Gilbert Community College as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00011% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Chandler–Gilbert Community College0.00012% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Chandler–Gilbert Community College over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Chandler

All research institutions in Chandler

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Chandler–Gilbert Community College. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.