Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Cambridge · United States

Charles River Analytics (United States)

In research, Charles River Analytics (United States) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#11,970 of 17,446 worldwide) and Computer Science (#4,754 of 6,336 worldwide), over all time.

cra.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#22,602
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#4,706
of 7,310
Research works
318
▼ 42% vs 2018-21
Citations
3.8k
12.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.7%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.88×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
17%
world 40%
International
10%
world 18%
Charles River Analytics (United States)

What is Charles River Analytics (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #11,970 of 17,446 4.6%213
Computer ScienceField #4,754 of 6,336 3.7%133

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Charles River Analytics (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Charles River Analytics (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 47% of research at Charles River Analytics (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 26% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (26%), Psychology (14%), Engineering (12%).

Physical Sciences: 14 fractional works · 46.5% of its workComputer Science: 8 fractional works · 25.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 5 fractional works · 16.9% of its workSoftware: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 11.6% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workApplied Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAtmospheric Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 25.9% of its workPsychology: 4 fractional works · 14.3% of its workSocial Psychology: 3 fractional works · 9.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 6 fractional works · 20.2% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 10.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 9.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 2 fractional works · 6.0% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKCharles RiverAnalytics (Unite…30fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences47%Health Sciences20%Social Sciences26%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science825.9%
    2. Engineering411.6%
    3. Physics and Astronomy12.7%
    4. Environmental Science12.6%
    5. Mathematics12.2%
    6. Earth and Planetary Sciences01.4%
    1. Psychology414.3%
    2. Social Sciences27.3%
    3. Decision Sciences12.6%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.9%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.7%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.2%
    1. Medicine310.4%
    2. Health Professions39.5%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    1. Neuroscience26.5%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology00.7%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.73× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 4.02× its world share, 2 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 3.33× its world share, 8 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.93× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.77× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.53× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.87× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 1.23× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 3.63× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.54× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.65× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.34× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.67× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.58× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology4.67×4 works
  2. Neuroscience4.02×2 works
  3. Health Professions3.63×3 works
  4. Computer Science3.33×8 works
  5. Decision Sciences2.65×1 works
  6. Mathematics1.87×1 works
  7. Physics and Astronomy1.23×1 works
  8. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.93×0 works
  9. Engineering0.77×4 works
  10. Immunology and Microbiology0.73×0 works
  11. Social Sciences0.58×2 works
  12. Medicine0.54×3 works
  13. Environmental Science0.53×1 works
  14. Nursing0.52×0 works
  15. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.34×0 works
  16. Business, Management and Accounting0.27×0 works
  17. Arts and Humanities0.05×0 works
  18. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Charles River Analytics (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Mark R. Stevens, Aaron T. Winder and Phillip C. Desrochers lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Charles River Analytics (United States).

  1. 1 Mark R. Stevens United States · #933,074 worldwide 5k citations · 188 works
  2. 2 Aaron T. Winder United States · #1,007,896 worldwide 624 citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Phillip C. Desrochers United States · #1,720,583 worldwide 307 citations · 28 works
  4. 4 A. K. Caglayan United States · #2,131,772 worldwide 796 citations · 46 works
  5. 5 W. Scott Neal Reilly United States · #2,433,653 worldwide 822 citations · 20 works
  6. 6 Camille S. Monnier United States · #2,465,071 worldwide 266 citations · 16 works
  7. 7 Spencer K. Lynn United States · #2,506,311 worldwide 868 citations · 38 works
  8. 8 Peter W Weyhrauch United States · #2,612,517 worldwide 508 citations · 23 works
  9. 9 Curt Wu United States · #2,751,159 worldwide 124 citations · 20 works
  10. 10 Subrata Kumar Das United States · #2,775,836 worldwide 2.5k citations · 129 works
All ranked researchers at Charles River Analytics (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Charles River Analytics (United States)?

The most cited paper from Charles River Analytics (United States) is "Fake News Detection on Social Media" (Kai Shu, Amy L. Sliva, Suhang Wang et al., 2017), with 3,290 citations. Next come "Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective" (601) and "Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization" (563).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Fake News Detection on Social Media Kai Shu, Amy L. Sliva, Suhang Wang et al. · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter Sep 2017 3,290
2 Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective Kai Shu, Amy L. Sliva, Suhang Wang et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) PreprintOpen access 7 Aug 2017 601
3 Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization Victor Sanh et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) PreprintOpen access 15 Oct 2021 563
4 A Generalized Extended Kalman Filter Implementation for the Robot Operating System Tom Moore, Daniel W. Stouch · Advances in intelligent systems and computing Book chapter 2 Sep 2015 423
5 An experimental evaluation of software redundancy as a strategy for improving reliability Dave E. Eckhardt, A. K. Caglayan, John C. Knight et al. · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Open access Jul 1991 175
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Charles River Analytics (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Autonomous Vehicles, Trust, Neural Networks, Automation, Driver Distraction and Global Existence.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 17 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 17 words, with their numbers
  1. Machine Learning4▲ 4.3×14 topics
  2. Deep Learning4▲ 3.4×13 topics
  3. Neural Networks2▲ 5.1×6 topics
  4. Autonomous Vehicles2▲ 33×2 topics
  5. Trust2▲ 25×2 topics
  6. Automation2▲ 82×1 topic
  7. Driver Distraction2▲ 145×1 topic
  8. Global Existence1▲ 134×2 topics
  9. Language1▲ 15×2 topics
  10. Cultural Evolution1▲ 72×2 topics
  11. Architecture-Based Approach1▲ 155×1 topic
  12. Clinical Decision Support Systems1▲ 128×1 topic
  13. Electronic Health Records1▲ 32×1 topic
  14. Phylogenetics1▲ 66×1 topic
  15. Security1▲ 4.9×4 topics
  16. Social Learning1▲ 115×1 topic
  17. Software Reliability Modeling1▲ 155×1 topic

Which research topics does Charles River Analytics (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Electronic Health Records Systems and Language and cultural evolution.

Human-Automation Interac…2Human-Automation Interaction and Safety: 2 fractional worksSoftware Reliability and…1Software Reliability and Analysis Research: 1 fractional worksElectronic Health Record…1Electronic Health Records Systems: 1 fractional worksLanguage and cultural ev…1Language and cultural evolution: 1 fractional worksModel Reduction and Neural Networks: 1 fractional worksNavier-Stokes equation solutions: 1 fractional worksStability and Controllab…1Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations: 1 fractional worksTopic Modeling: 1 fractional worksEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces: 1 fractional worksOccupational Health and …1Occupational Health and Safety Research: 1 fractional works
Social PsychologySoftwareHealth Information ManagementCultural Studies6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 2 works
  2. 2 Software Reliability and Analysis Research Software 1 works
  3. 3 Electronic Health Records Systems Health Information Management 1 works
  4. 4 Language and cultural evolution Cultural Studies 1 works
  5. 5 Model Reduction and Neural Networks Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1 works
  6. 6 Navier-Stokes equation solutions Applied Mathematics 1 works
  7. 7 Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
  8. 8 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  9. 9 EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  10. 10 Occupational Health and Safety Research Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available16.8%not open83.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors10.1%domestic only89.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Charles River Analytics (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 42% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Charles River Analytics (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00013% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Charles River Analytics (United States)0.00013% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Charles River Analytics (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Cambridge

All research institutions in Cambridge

Share Charles River Analytics (United States)'s ranking

Charles River Analytics (United States) on Science Explorer

A card with Charles River Analytics (United States)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Charles River Analytics (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.