Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Edgewater · United States

Chesapeake Research Consortium

Research works
61
▲ 183% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.2k
35.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
13.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
10%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Chesapeake Research Consortium is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Chesapeake Research Consortium work in?

In all years, 50% of research at Chesapeake Research Consortium is in Physical Sciences, 23% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (27%), Medicine (14%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (11%).

Physical Sciences: 31 fractional works · 50.0% of its workEnvironmental Science: 16 fractional works · 26.7% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 3 fractional works · 5.1% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 3 fractional works · 4.9% of its workWater Science and Technology: 3 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEcology: 3 fractional works · 4.5% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 7 fractional works · 11.3% of its workOceanography: 5 fractional works · 7.7% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 6.0% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHardware and Architecture: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDiscrete Mathematics and Combinatorics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 14 fractional works · 22.7% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 14.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Professions: 4 fractional works · 6.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 4.7% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNursing: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 15.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLife Sciences: 7 fractional works · 12.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 4 fractional works · 5.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 3 fractional works · 4.5% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKChesapeakeResearch…61fractional works, all years
Life Sciences12%Physical Sciences50%Health Sciences23%Social Sciences15%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science1626.7%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences711.3%
    3. Engineering46.0%
    4. Computer Science23.9%
    5. Mathematics00.8%
    6. Physics and Astronomy00.5%
    7. Materials Science00.4%
    8. Energy00.4%
    1. Medicine914.2%
    2. Health Professions46.7%
    3. Nursing11.5%
    4. Dentistry00.1%
    5. Veterinary00.1%
    1. Social Sciences23.7%
    2. Decision Sciences22.7%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.6%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting22.6%
    5. Psychology12.1%
    6. Arts and Humanities11.4%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences45.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology23.7%
    3. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics12.0%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.43× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.51× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Earth and Planetary Sciences: 11.06× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 1.41× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 7.31× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceDentistry: 2.11× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.39× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.44× its world share, 1 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 11.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 11 fields, with their numbers
  1. Earth and Planetary Sciences11.06×1 works
  2. Environmental Science7.31×3 works
  3. Dentistry2.11×0 works
  4. Engineering1.41×2 works
  5. Health Professions1.39×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.51×0 works
  7. Psychology0.45×0 works
  8. Medicine0.44×1 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.43×0 works
  10. Social Sciences0.41×0 works
  11. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.37×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Chesapeake Research Consortium?

Ranked on the quality score, Kevin G. Sellner, Lewis Eugene Cronin and Felix A. Khin-Maung-Gyi lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Chesapeake Research Consortium.

  1. 1 Kevin G. Sellner United States · #619,060 worldwide 6.3k citations · 68 works
  2. 2 Lewis Eugene Cronin United States · #1,234,545 worldwide 1.7k citations · 28 works
  3. 3 Felix A. Khin-Maung-Gyi United States · #2,955,321 worldwide 93 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Robert C. Jones United States · #3,612,649 worldwide 6 citations · 17 works
  5. 5 Robert J. Wood United States · #6,502,676 worldwide 0 citations · 157 works
All ranked researchers at Chesapeake Research Consortium

What are the most cited papers from Chesapeake Research Consortium?

The most cited paper from Chesapeake Research Consortium is "Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus" (J. Heisler, Patricia M. Glibert, JoAnn M. Burkholder et al., 2008), with 2,099 citations. Next come "Harmful algal blooms: causes, impacts and detection" (664) and "Chesapeake Bay Anoxia: Origin, Development, and Significance" (652).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus J. Heisler, Patricia M. Glibert, JoAnn M. Burkholder et al. · Harmful Algae Open access 30 Aug 2008 2,099
2 Harmful algal blooms: causes, impacts and detection Kevin G. Sellner, Gregory J. Doucette, Gary J. Kirkpatrick · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology Open access Jul 2003 664
3 Chesapeake Bay Anoxia: Origin, Development, and Significance Charles B. Officer, Robert B. Biggs, Jay L. Taft et al. · Science 6 Jan 1984 652
4 Development of Visual Preference for Natural Environments John D. Balling, John H. Falk · Environment and Behavior 1982 550
5 Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay Raymond G. Najjar, Christopher R. Pyke, Mary Beth Adams et al. · Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 15 Oct 2009 535
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Chesapeake Research Consortium?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Eutrophication, Sediment Transport, Harmful Algal Blooms, Global Warming, Water Quality, Land Use Change and Hydrological Modeling.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change10▲ 6.5×22 topics
  2. Eutrophication4▲ 48×3 topics
  3. Sediment Transport4▲ 37×3 topics
  4. Global Warming4▲ 16×7 topics
  5. Harmful Algal Blooms4▲ 57×3 topics
  6. Public Health3▲ 3.6×9 topics
  7. Water Quality3▲ 11×7 topics
  8. Remote Sensing3▲ 4.0×7 topics
  9. Land Use Change2▲ 14×3 topics
  10. Hydrological Modeling2▲ 20×3 topics
  11. Model Evaluation2▲ 34×2 topics
  12. Dissolved Organic Matter2▲ 64×1 topic
  13. Ecosystem Services2▲ 10×5 topics
  14. Oceanic Carbon Cycle2▲ 64×1 topic
  15. Water Resources2▲ 16×2 topics
  16. Biogeography2▲ 9.9×3 topics
  17. Sea-Level Rise2▲ 32×2 topics
  18. Global Hydrology2▲ 53×1 topic
  19. Invasive Species2▲ 5.5×7 topics
  20. Nutrient Cycling2▲ 40×2 topics
  21. Uncertainty Assessment2▲ 53×1 topic
  22. Climate Change Impacts2▲ 21×2 topics
  23. DNA Barcoding2▲ 19×4 topics
  24. Fisheries Sustainability2▲ 23×2 topics
  25. Wave Modeling2▲ 44×2 topics
  26. Ecosystem Functioning2▲ 12×4 topics
  27. Hyporheic Zone2▲ 84×1 topic
  28. Phosphorus Management2▲ 84×1 topic
  29. Stakeholder Engagement2▲ 37×2 topics
  30. Coastal Dynamics2▲ 73×1 topic
  31. Shoreline Change2▲ 73×1 topic
  32. Benthic Communities1▲ 26×2 topics
  33. Environmental Policy1▲ 15×2 topics
  34. Marine Biodiversity1▲ 26×2 topics
  35. Coleoptera1▲ 127×2 topics
  36. Ecosystem Management1▲ 26×1 topic
  37. Elderly1▲ 8.8×2 topics
  38. Emotions1▲ 43×2 topics
  39. Job Satisfaction1▲ 8.7×2 topics
  40. Phylogeny1▲ 12×2 topics

Which research topics does Chesapeake Research Consortium publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Coastal and Marine Dynamics, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies and Coastal and Marine Management.

  1. 1 Coastal and Marine Dynamics Earth-Surface Processes 1 works
  2. 2 Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics Environmental Chemistry 0 works
  3. 3 Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies Water Science and Technology 0 works
  4. 4 Coastal and Marine Management Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  5. 5 Occupational Therapy Practice and Research Occupational Therapy 0 works
  6. 6 Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research Aerospace Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  9. 9 Engineering Applied Research Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available24.4%not open75.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors10.5%domestic only89.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Chesapeake Research Consortium's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 183% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Chesapeake Research Consortium as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000060% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Chesapeake Research Consortium0.000058% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Chesapeake Research Consortium over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Edgewater

All research institutions in Edgewater

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Chesapeake Research Consortium. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.