Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Bristol · United Kingdom

Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom)

Research works
17
▼ 8% vs 2018-21
Citations
360
21.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.6%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
60%
world 40%
International
65%
world 18%
Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom)

Not ranked overall: Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) work in?

In all years, 46% of research at Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) is in Physical Sciences, 40% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (24%), Engineering (23%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (10%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 45.6% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 22.6% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 12.8% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 7.4% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 6.9% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 39.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 23.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 8.2% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 5.9% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 9.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 7.5% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workBusiness and International Management: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 10.0% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workHealth Informatics: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKClean EnergyProspector…17fractional works, all years
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences46%Health Sciences10%Social Sciences40%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering422.6%
    2. Environmental Science17.4%
    3. Materials Science16.9%
    4. Computer Science13.9%
    5. Energy02.1%
    6. Physics and Astronomy01.7%
    7. Chemical Engineering01.0%
    1. Social Sciences423.5%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance29.8%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting14.9%
    4. Psychology01.0%
    5. Decision Sciences00.4%
    6. Arts and Humanities00.2%
    1. Medicine14.2%
    2. Dentistry02.6%
    3. Health Professions02.2%
    4. Nursing01.0%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences14.1%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.68× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 2.92× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnvironmental Science: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.40× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksMedicineNursing: 3.31× its world share, 0 worksNursingBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.47× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.35× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 11.41× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 1.57× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 11.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance11.41×1 works
  2. Nursing3.31×0 works
  3. Computer Science2.92×1 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting2.47×0 works
  5. Decision Sciences2.35×0 works
  6. Social Sciences1.57×1 works
  7. Health Professions1.40×0 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.68×0 works
  9. Medicine0.66×0 works
  10. Environmental Science0.29×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom)?

The most cited paper from Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) is "The Economics of Career Concerns, Part I: Comparing Information Structures" (Mathias Dewatripont, Ian Jewitt, Jean Tirole, 1999), with 606 citations. Next come "Financial innovation: The bright and the dark sides" (423) and "Dietary fiber and phenolic compounds as functional ingredients: interaction and possible effect after ingestion" (292).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Economics of Career Concerns, Part I: Comparing Information Structures Mathias Dewatripont, Ian Jewitt, Jean Tirole · The Review of Economic Studies 1999 606
2 Financial innovation: The bright and the dark sides Thorsten Beck, Tao Chen, Chen Lin et al. · Journal of Banking & Finance Open access 5 Aug 2016 423
3 Dietary fiber and phenolic compounds as functional ingredients: interaction and possible effect after ingestion Ana Elena Quirós-Sauceda, H. Palafox-Carlos, Sonia G. Sáyago‐Ayerdi et al. · Food & Function 2014 292
4 Neighbourhoods, households and income dynamics: a semi-parametric investigation of neighbourhood effects Anne Bolster, SIMON M. BURGESS, Ron J. Johnston et al. · Journal of Economic Geography 18 Sep 2006 122
5 New Technology And Jobs: Comparative Evidence From A Two Country Study‡ David G. Blanchflower, SIMON M. BURGESS · Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1998 99
All 49 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Artificial Intelligence in Education, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth.

  1. 1 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 0 works
  2. 2 Artificial Intelligence in Education Information Systems 0 works
  3. 3 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  4. 4 Energy, Environment, Economic Growth Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  5. 5 Economic and Technological Innovation Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  6. 6 Innovation and Socioeconomic Development Business and International Management 0 works
  7. 7 Media Influence and Politics Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  8. 8 Defense, Military, and Policy Studies Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  9. 9 COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  10. 10 Global trade and economics General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available60.3%not open39.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors65.1%domestic only34.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 8% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000069% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom)0.000027% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Bristol

All research institutions in Bristol

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Clean Energy Prospector (United Kingdom). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.