Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Kingston · Canada

Clinical Evaluation Research Unit

Research works
48
▼ 33% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.1k
84.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
40.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
46%
world 40%
International
62%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Clinical Evaluation Research Unit is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Clinical Evaluation Research Unit work in?

In all years, 91% of research at Clinical Evaluation Research Unit is in Health Sciences, 4% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (60%), Nursing (24%), Health Professions (7%). It does 3.3× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 44 fractional works · 90.7% of its workMedicine: 29 fractional works · 60.1% of its workPhysiology: 8 fractional works · 17.4% of its workSurgery: 4 fractional works · 8.7% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 3 fractional works · 6.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 3 fractional works · 6.2% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 5.2% of its workEpidemiology: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workGeriatrics and Gerontology: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workNephrology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNursing: 12 fractional works · 23.9% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 12 fractional works · 23.9% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 6.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEndocrine and Autonomic Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKClinicalEvaluation…48fractional works, all years
Life Sciences4%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences91%Social Sciences3%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2960.1%
    2. Nursing1223.9%
    3. Health Professions36.7%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.3%
    2. Neuroscience00.8%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.5%
    4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    1. Psychology12.2%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.5%
    3. Social Sciences00.4%
    4. Decision Sciences00.1%
    1. Engineering00.9%
    2. Mathematics00.8%
    3. Chemistry00.1%
    4. Computer Science00.1%
    5. Materials Science00.1%
    6. Environmental Science00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.11× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.93× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Engineering: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringMathematics: 2.27× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 1.18× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.62× its world share, 3 worksMedicineNursing: 58.13× its world share, 2 worksNursingDecision Sciences: 1.00× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 0.88× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 58.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 11 fields, with their numbers
  1. Nursing58.13×2 works
  2. Medicine2.62×3 works
  3. Mathematics2.27×0 works
  4. Health Professions1.18×0 works
  5. Decision Sciences1.00×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.93×0 works
  7. Psychology0.88×0 works
  8. Immunology and Microbiology0.30×0 works
  9. Engineering0.22×0 works
  10. Social Sciences0.21×0 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.11×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Clinical Evaluation Research Unit?

The most cited paper from Clinical Evaluation Research Unit is "Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel" (Rebecca L. Sudore, Hillary D. Lum, John J. You et al., 2017), with 1,763 citations. Next come "The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study" (983) and "Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool" (878).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel Rebecca L. Sudore, Hillary D. Lum, John J. You et al. · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Open access 5 Jan 2017 1,763
2 The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study Cathy Alberda, Leah M Gramlich, N. F. Jones et al. · Intensive Care Medicine Jul 2009 983
3 Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool Daren Keith Heyland, Rupinder Dhaliwal, Xuran Jiang et al. · Critical Care Open access 15 Nov 2011 878
4 Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool Adam Rahman, Rana M. Hasan, Ravi Agarwala et al. · Clinical Nutrition 27 Jan 2015 537
5 Failure to Engage Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Families in Advance Care Planning Daren Keith Heyland · JAMA Internal Medicine Apr 2013 509
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Clinical Evaluation Research Unit?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Critical Care, Inflammation, Aging, Enteral Nutrition, Nutrition Support Therapy, Prognosis, Muscle Mass and Cancer Cachexia.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Critical Care12▲ 112×5 topics
  2. Inflammation10▲ 9.0×12 topics
  3. Aging10▲ 38×5 topics
  4. Enteral Nutrition9▲ 531×1 topic
  5. Nutrition Support Therapy9▲ 531×1 topic
  6. Prognosis8▲ 53×3 topics
  7. Muscle Mass8▲ 197×2 topics
  8. Cancer Cachexia8▲ 272×1 topic
  9. Sarcopenia8▲ 272×1 topic
  10. Elderly Patients4▲ 59×3 topics
  11. Intensive Care Unit3▲ 69×3 topics
  12. Rehabilitation3▲ 17×4 topics
  13. Epidemiology3▲ 1.56×16 topics
  14. Enhanced Recovery3▲ 156×1 topic
  15. Ethical Considerations3▲ 19×3 topics
  16. Perioperative Care3▲ 52×2 topics
  17. Surgical Care3▲ 160×1 topic
  18. Sepsis3▲ 35×5 topics
  19. End-of-Life3▲ 66×2 topics
  20. Palliative Care3▲ 33×2 topics
  21. Health Care Costs2▲ 67×2 topics
  22. Advance Care Planning2▲ 88×1 topic
  23. Family Perspectives2▲ 88×1 topic
  24. Heart Failure2▲ 9.9×6 topics
  25. Delirium2▲ 106×1 topic
  26. Mechanically Ventilated Patients2▲ 106×1 topic
  27. Treatment2▲ 3.2×6 topics
  28. Patient-Centered Care2▲ 63×2 topics
  29. Resuscitation2▲ 31×4 topics
  30. Osteoporosis2▲ 41×2 topics
  31. Elderly2▲ 14×2 topics
  32. Hyponatremia2▲ 106×1 topic
  33. Vasopressin2▲ 40×1 topic
  34. Family Needs1▲ 99×1 topic
  35. Family Presence1▲ 99×1 topic
  36. Healthcare-Associated Infections1▲ 22×3 topics
  37. Nosocomial Infections1▲ 55×2 topics
  38. Frailty1▲ 87×1 topic
  39. Geriatric Assessment1▲ 53×1 topic
  40. ICU1▲ 90×1 topic

Which research topics does Clinical Evaluation Research Unit publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Health in Aging, Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research and Vitamin K Research Studies.

  1. 1 Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology Nutrition and Dietetics 1 works
  2. 2 Nutrition and Health in Aging Physiology 1 works
  3. 3 Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research Nutrition and Dietetics 0 works
  4. 4 Vitamin K Research Studies Nutrition and Dietetics 0 works
  5. 5 Hip and Femur Fractures Surgery 0 works
  6. 6 Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 0 works
  7. 7 Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Surgery 0 works
  8. 8 Wound Healing and Treatments Rehabilitation 0 works
  9. 9 Higher Education Learning Practices Education 0 works
  10. 10 Engineering Education and Curriculum Development Media Technology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available46.5%not open53.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors62.2%domestic only37.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Clinical Evaluation Research Unit's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 33% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Clinical Evaluation Research Unit as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000012% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Clinical Evaluation Research Unit0.0000060% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Clinical Evaluation Research Unit over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Kingston

All research institutions in Kingston

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Clinical Evaluation Research Unit. Posts are plain text and can be reported.