Digital Heritage Netherlands
In research, Digital Heritage Netherlands stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,892 of 14,833 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#6,492 of 9,330 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022-now
- #18,770 of 22,385 · #15,905 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #168 of 197
- Research works
- 426 ▼ 22% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 3.2k 7.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.2% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.00× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 52% world 40%
- International
- 36% world 18%
What is Digital Heritage Netherlands known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #7,892 of 14,833 | 7.5% | 220 | |
| Social SciencesField | #6,492 of 9,330 | 7.2% | 126 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Digital Heritage Netherlands sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Digital Heritage Netherlands work in?
In 2022-now, 54% of research at Digital Heritage Netherlands is in Social Sciences, 21% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (29%), Arts and Humanities (16%), Medicine (12%). It does 2.0× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 22 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences3753.6%
- Social Sciences2029.3%
- Arts and Humanities1115.9%
- Business, Management and Accounting23.3%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.6%
- Psychology11.7%
- Decision Sciences10.7%
- Health Sciences1521.0%
- Medicine812.1%
- Health Professions68.0%
- Nursing00.4%
- Veterinary00.4%
- Physical Sciences1014.5%
- Computer Science33.9%
- Engineering23.0%
- Environmental Science22.9%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences12.0%
- Physics and Astronomy11.5%
- Materials Science10.8%
- Chemistry00.3%
- Life Sciences811.0%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 5.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 22 fields, with their numbers
- Arts and Humanities5.51×11 works
- Health Professions3.04×6 works
- Veterinary2.86×0 works
- Social Sciences2.32×20 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.31×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.22×2 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.09×0 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.05×4 works
- Neuroscience1.04×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.03×2 works
- Nursing0.82×0 works
- Decision Sciences0.77×0 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.68×0 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.66×1 works
- Medicine0.63×8 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.61×2 works
- Environmental Science0.59×2 works
- Psychology0.55×1 works
- Computer Science0.50×3 works
- Materials Science0.24×1 works
- Chemistry0.20×0 works
- Engineering0.20×2 works
- Arts and Humanities 5.5×
- Health Professions 3.0×
- Veterinary 2.9×
- Social Sciences 2.3×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 1.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.1×
- Neuroscience 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.0×
- Nursing 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.7×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Computer Science 0.5×
- Materials Science 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Digital Heritage Netherlands?
Ranked on the quality score, A. A. Nijland, G. W. de Wit and J.-P. Grignet lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Digital Heritage Netherlands.
- 1
A. A. Nijland
Netherlands · #2,881,052 worldwide 4 citations · 20 works
- 2
G. W. de Wit
Netherlands · #3,118,166 worldwide 122 citations · 13 works
- 3
J.-P. Grignet
Netherlands · #3,821,330 worldwide 205 citations · 21 works
- 4
Maaike den Draak
Netherlands · #5,148,401 worldwide 35 citations · 34 works
Which keywords describe research at Digital Heritage Netherlands?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Gender, Social History, Cultural Identity, Identity, History, Cultural Studies, Occupation and Reformation.
- Vulnerability
- Nutrition Transition
- Complex Systems
- Arctic Indigenous Peoples
- Language
- Immigration
- Digitalization
- Governance
- Religious Controversy
- Leadership
- Traditional Knowledge
- Literature
- Palliative Care
- Forced Laborers
- Reformation
- Occupation
- Globalization
- Innovation
- Cultural Identity
- Social History
- Gender
- Identity
- History
- Sustainable Development
- Cultural Studies
- Public Health
- Big Data
- Nazi Propaganda
- Sexuality
- Theology
- Cultural Heritage
- Calvinism
- Bildung
- Chronic Diseases
- Healthcare Utilization
- Intercultural Competence
- Science
- Autorschaft
- Literaturkritik
- Social Innovation
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Gender4▲ 11×7 topics
- Social History4▲ 65×3 topics
- Identity3▲ 6.2×9 topics
- Cultural Identity3▲ 8.6×9 topics
- History3▲ 5.7×11 topics
- Innovation3▲ 3.6×8 topics
- Sustainable Development3▲ 2.4×8 topics
- Globalization2▲ 1.83×12 topics
- Cultural Studies2▲ 9.2×2 topics
- Occupation2▲ 54×2 topics
- Public Health2▲ 2.3×6 topics
- Reformation2▲ 113×2 topics
- Big Data2▲ 3.1×7 topics
- Forced Laborers2▲ 163×1 topic
- Nazi Propaganda2▲ 163×1 topic
- Palliative Care2▲ 20×2 topics
- Sexuality2▲ 42×2 topics
- Literature2▲ 4.8×6 topics
- Theology2▲ 29×2 topics
- Traditional Knowledge2▲ 62×3 topics
- Cultural Heritage2▲ 4.6×9 topics
- Leadership2▲ 5.0×6 topics
- Calvinism2▲ 96×1 topic
- Religious Controversy2▲ 96×1 topic
- Bildung1▲ 65×2 topics
- Governance1▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Chronic Diseases1▲ 7.6×2 topics
- Digitalization1▲ 8.8×3 topics
- Healthcare Utilization1▲ 23×2 topics
- Immigration1▲ 17×2 topics
- Intercultural Competence1▲ 51×2 topics
- Language1▲ 7.8×3 topics
- Science1▲ 7.5×5 topics
- Arctic Indigenous Peoples1▲ 97×1 topic
- Autorschaft1▲ 91×1 topic
- Complex Systems1▲ 16×2 topics
- Literaturkritik1▲ 91×1 topic
- Nutrition Transition1▲ 52×1 topic
- Social Innovation1▲ 11×5 topics
- Vulnerability1▲ 7.7×2 topics
Which research topics does Digital Heritage Netherlands publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: European history and politics, Reformation and Early Modern Christianity, German Literature and Culture Studies and Indigenous Studies and Ecology.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 European history and politics Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 2 Reformation and Early Modern Christianity History 2 works
- 3 German Literature and Culture Studies Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
- 4 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 1 works
- 5 Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1 works
- 6 Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
- 7 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 1 works
- 8 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 1 works
- 9 Migration, Refugees, and Integration Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 10 International Student and Expatriate Challenges Communication 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Digital Heritage Netherlands's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 22% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Digital Heritage Netherlands as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00021% in 2024.
Fractional works of Digital Heritage Netherlands over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in The Hague
- Shell (Netherlands)
- House of Representatives
- The Hague University of Applied Sciences
- Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
- Haga Hospital
- Netherlands Institute for Social Research
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
- CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Digital Heritage Netherlands. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
